{"title":"机器人根治性前列腺切除术后 3 个月实现无尿--可能吗?","authors":"Tiago Santos MSc, RN, Mário Varandas RN, Daniela Dias MSc, RN, Inês Sousa MSc","doi":"10.1111/ijun.12396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Urinary incontinence (UI) remains a significant concern after radical prostatectomy. As a part of a nursing follow-up, we evaluate quality-of-life (QoL) which includes UI recovery. Patients proposed to Retzius-sparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) have a bundle of appointments starting pre-operatively and continuing after surgery 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. In these, we started a urinary rehabilitation programme (URP) performing Kegel Exercises, adaptative and behavioural strategies. The objective is to evaluate timeline until urinary continence recovery after RS-RARP, since this is one of the most asked question by our patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Between July 2017 and April 2020 we conducted a prospective observational single-centre study with a total of 208 patients submitted to RS-RARP. We applied the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) questionnaire pre and postoperatively at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, and studied UI by evaluating pad count measured in the 3rd question. The inclusion criteria are: patients that did not have adjuvant or salvage treatments during the follow up; have all pre- and post-operative evaluations; who were continent pre-operatively; and started the URP. A total of 72 patients were included. We have considered the criteria of no pad use for continence recovery. Every patient provided written informed consent for study inclusion, approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (Approval 07.07.2017).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Preliminary analysis of enrolled patients reveals that 57 (79,16%) recovered continence during the 12 months period. By 3-month mark, we observed that 42 (73,68%) patients were continent; 7 (12,28%) recovered continence at 6-month mark; 4 (7,02%) recovered continence at 9-month mark and 4 (7,02%) recovered continence 1 year after surgery. We further analysed the total number of pads used daily by the 15 patients (20,83%) that had UI at 12-month mark: 13 patients (86,67%) reported using 1 pad a day and 2 patients (13,33% or 2,77% of all studied population) reported using 3 or more pads a day.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The preliminary results demonstrate a gradual improvement in UI over the first year, with a significant number of patients recovering at 3-month mark. These positive results are most probably consequences of both the surgical approach and the URP. Is required a sub-group analysis to further delineate factors impacting continence recovery, aiding in postoperative rehabilitation care plans that will impact positive outcome on QoL associated with a fast UI recovery. For the latter, digital tools to conduct patient reported outcomes are necessary to ascertain the extent of impact in QoL. Furthermore, we need to rethink remote strategies to improve patient compliance as a significant number of them were excluded for not attending on-site nursing appointments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50281,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A 3-month mark to urinary continence, after robotic radical prostatectomy—Is it possible?\",\"authors\":\"Tiago Santos MSc, RN, Mário Varandas RN, Daniela Dias MSc, RN, Inês Sousa MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijun.12396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Urinary incontinence (UI) remains a significant concern after radical prostatectomy. As a part of a nursing follow-up, we evaluate quality-of-life (QoL) which includes UI recovery. Patients proposed to Retzius-sparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) have a bundle of appointments starting pre-operatively and continuing after surgery 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. In these, we started a urinary rehabilitation programme (URP) performing Kegel Exercises, adaptative and behavioural strategies. The objective is to evaluate timeline until urinary continence recovery after RS-RARP, since this is one of the most asked question by our patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Between July 2017 and April 2020 we conducted a prospective observational single-centre study with a total of 208 patients submitted to RS-RARP. We applied the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) questionnaire pre and postoperatively at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, and studied UI by evaluating pad count measured in the 3rd question. The inclusion criteria are: patients that did not have adjuvant or salvage treatments during the follow up; have all pre- and post-operative evaluations; who were continent pre-operatively; and started the URP. A total of 72 patients were included. We have considered the criteria of no pad use for continence recovery. Every patient provided written informed consent for study inclusion, approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (Approval 07.07.2017).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Preliminary analysis of enrolled patients reveals that 57 (79,16%) recovered continence during the 12 months period. By 3-month mark, we observed that 42 (73,68%) patients were continent; 7 (12,28%) recovered continence at 6-month mark; 4 (7,02%) recovered continence at 9-month mark and 4 (7,02%) recovered continence 1 year after surgery. We further analysed the total number of pads used daily by the 15 patients (20,83%) that had UI at 12-month mark: 13 patients (86,67%) reported using 1 pad a day and 2 patients (13,33% or 2,77% of all studied population) reported using 3 or more pads a day.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The preliminary results demonstrate a gradual improvement in UI over the first year, with a significant number of patients recovering at 3-month mark. These positive results are most probably consequences of both the surgical approach and the URP. Is required a sub-group analysis to further delineate factors impacting continence recovery, aiding in postoperative rehabilitation care plans that will impact positive outcome on QoL associated with a fast UI recovery. For the latter, digital tools to conduct patient reported outcomes are necessary to ascertain the extent of impact in QoL. Furthermore, we need to rethink remote strategies to improve patient compliance as a significant number of them were excluded for not attending on-site nursing appointments.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Urological Nursing\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Urological Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.12396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.12396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
A 3-month mark to urinary continence, after robotic radical prostatectomy—Is it possible?
Introduction and Objectives
Urinary incontinence (UI) remains a significant concern after radical prostatectomy. As a part of a nursing follow-up, we evaluate quality-of-life (QoL) which includes UI recovery. Patients proposed to Retzius-sparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) have a bundle of appointments starting pre-operatively and continuing after surgery 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. In these, we started a urinary rehabilitation programme (URP) performing Kegel Exercises, adaptative and behavioural strategies. The objective is to evaluate timeline until urinary continence recovery after RS-RARP, since this is one of the most asked question by our patients.
Materials and Methods
Between July 2017 and April 2020 we conducted a prospective observational single-centre study with a total of 208 patients submitted to RS-RARP. We applied the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) questionnaire pre and postoperatively at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, and studied UI by evaluating pad count measured in the 3rd question. The inclusion criteria are: patients that did not have adjuvant or salvage treatments during the follow up; have all pre- and post-operative evaluations; who were continent pre-operatively; and started the URP. A total of 72 patients were included. We have considered the criteria of no pad use for continence recovery. Every patient provided written informed consent for study inclusion, approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (Approval 07.07.2017).
Results
Preliminary analysis of enrolled patients reveals that 57 (79,16%) recovered continence during the 12 months period. By 3-month mark, we observed that 42 (73,68%) patients were continent; 7 (12,28%) recovered continence at 6-month mark; 4 (7,02%) recovered continence at 9-month mark and 4 (7,02%) recovered continence 1 year after surgery. We further analysed the total number of pads used daily by the 15 patients (20,83%) that had UI at 12-month mark: 13 patients (86,67%) reported using 1 pad a day and 2 patients (13,33% or 2,77% of all studied population) reported using 3 or more pads a day.
Conclusion
The preliminary results demonstrate a gradual improvement in UI over the first year, with a significant number of patients recovering at 3-month mark. These positive results are most probably consequences of both the surgical approach and the URP. Is required a sub-group analysis to further delineate factors impacting continence recovery, aiding in postoperative rehabilitation care plans that will impact positive outcome on QoL associated with a fast UI recovery. For the latter, digital tools to conduct patient reported outcomes are necessary to ascertain the extent of impact in QoL. Furthermore, we need to rethink remote strategies to improve patient compliance as a significant number of them were excluded for not attending on-site nursing appointments.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Urological Nursing is an international peer-reviewed Journal for all nurses, non-specialist and specialist, who care for individuals with urological disorders. It is relevant for nurses working in a variety of settings: inpatient care, outpatient care, ambulatory care, community care, operating departments and specialist clinics. The Journal covers the whole spectrum of urological nursing skills and knowledge. It supports the publication of local issues of relevance to a wider international community to disseminate good practice.
The International Journal of Urological Nursing is clinically focused, evidence-based and welcomes contributions in the following clinical and non-clinical areas:
-General Urology-
Continence care-
Oncology-
Andrology-
Stoma care-
Paediatric urology-
Men’s health-
Uro-gynaecology-
Reconstructive surgery-
Clinical audit-
Clinical governance-
Nurse-led services-
Reflective analysis-
Education-
Management-
Research-
Leadership
The Journal welcomes original research papers, practice development papers and literature reviews. It also invites shorter papers such as case reports, critical commentary, reflective analysis and reports of audit, as well as contributions to regular sections such as the media reviews section. The International Journal of Urological Nursing supports the development of academic writing within the specialty and particularly welcomes papers from young researchers or practitioners who are seeking to build a publication profile.