机器人根治性前列腺切除术后 3 个月实现无尿--可能吗?

Tiago Santos MSc, RN, Mário Varandas RN, Daniela Dias MSc, RN, Inês Sousa MSc
{"title":"机器人根治性前列腺切除术后 3 个月实现无尿--可能吗?","authors":"Tiago Santos MSc, RN,&nbsp;Mário Varandas RN,&nbsp;Daniela Dias MSc, RN,&nbsp;Inês Sousa MSc","doi":"10.1111/ijun.12396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Urinary incontinence (UI) remains a significant concern after radical prostatectomy. As a part of a nursing follow-up, we evaluate quality-of-life (QoL) which includes UI recovery. Patients proposed to Retzius-sparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) have a bundle of appointments starting pre-operatively and continuing after surgery 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. In these, we started a urinary rehabilitation programme (URP) performing Kegel Exercises, adaptative and behavioural strategies. The objective is to evaluate timeline until urinary continence recovery after RS-RARP, since this is one of the most asked question by our patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Between July 2017 and April 2020 we conducted a prospective observational single-centre study with a total of 208 patients submitted to RS-RARP. We applied the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) questionnaire pre and postoperatively at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, and studied UI by evaluating pad count measured in the 3rd question. The inclusion criteria are: patients that did not have adjuvant or salvage treatments during the follow up; have all pre- and post-operative evaluations; who were continent pre-operatively; and started the URP. A total of 72 patients were included. We have considered the criteria of no pad use for continence recovery. Every patient provided written informed consent for study inclusion, approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (Approval 07.07.2017).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Preliminary analysis of enrolled patients reveals that 57 (79,16%) recovered continence during the 12 months period. By 3-month mark, we observed that 42 (73,68%) patients were continent; 7 (12,28%) recovered continence at 6-month mark; 4 (7,02%) recovered continence at 9-month mark and 4 (7,02%) recovered continence 1 year after surgery. We further analysed the total number of pads used daily by the 15 patients (20,83%) that had UI at 12-month mark: 13 patients (86,67%) reported using 1 pad a day and 2 patients (13,33% or 2,77% of all studied population) reported using 3 or more pads a day.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The preliminary results demonstrate a gradual improvement in UI over the first year, with a significant number of patients recovering at 3-month mark. These positive results are most probably consequences of both the surgical approach and the URP. Is required a sub-group analysis to further delineate factors impacting continence recovery, aiding in postoperative rehabilitation care plans that will impact positive outcome on QoL associated with a fast UI recovery. For the latter, digital tools to conduct patient reported outcomes are necessary to ascertain the extent of impact in QoL. Furthermore, we need to rethink remote strategies to improve patient compliance as a significant number of them were excluded for not attending on-site nursing appointments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50281,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A 3-month mark to urinary continence, after robotic radical prostatectomy—Is it possible?\",\"authors\":\"Tiago Santos MSc, RN,&nbsp;Mário Varandas RN,&nbsp;Daniela Dias MSc, RN,&nbsp;Inês Sousa MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijun.12396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Urinary incontinence (UI) remains a significant concern after radical prostatectomy. As a part of a nursing follow-up, we evaluate quality-of-life (QoL) which includes UI recovery. Patients proposed to Retzius-sparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) have a bundle of appointments starting pre-operatively and continuing after surgery 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. In these, we started a urinary rehabilitation programme (URP) performing Kegel Exercises, adaptative and behavioural strategies. The objective is to evaluate timeline until urinary continence recovery after RS-RARP, since this is one of the most asked question by our patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Between July 2017 and April 2020 we conducted a prospective observational single-centre study with a total of 208 patients submitted to RS-RARP. We applied the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) questionnaire pre and postoperatively at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, and studied UI by evaluating pad count measured in the 3rd question. The inclusion criteria are: patients that did not have adjuvant or salvage treatments during the follow up; have all pre- and post-operative evaluations; who were continent pre-operatively; and started the URP. A total of 72 patients were included. We have considered the criteria of no pad use for continence recovery. Every patient provided written informed consent for study inclusion, approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (Approval 07.07.2017).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Preliminary analysis of enrolled patients reveals that 57 (79,16%) recovered continence during the 12 months period. By 3-month mark, we observed that 42 (73,68%) patients were continent; 7 (12,28%) recovered continence at 6-month mark; 4 (7,02%) recovered continence at 9-month mark and 4 (7,02%) recovered continence 1 year after surgery. We further analysed the total number of pads used daily by the 15 patients (20,83%) that had UI at 12-month mark: 13 patients (86,67%) reported using 1 pad a day and 2 patients (13,33% or 2,77% of all studied population) reported using 3 or more pads a day.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The preliminary results demonstrate a gradual improvement in UI over the first year, with a significant number of patients recovering at 3-month mark. These positive results are most probably consequences of both the surgical approach and the URP. Is required a sub-group analysis to further delineate factors impacting continence recovery, aiding in postoperative rehabilitation care plans that will impact positive outcome on QoL associated with a fast UI recovery. For the latter, digital tools to conduct patient reported outcomes are necessary to ascertain the extent of impact in QoL. Furthermore, we need to rethink remote strategies to improve patient compliance as a significant number of them were excluded for not attending on-site nursing appointments.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Urological Nursing\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Urological Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.12396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.12396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言和目的 尿失禁(UI)仍然是根治性前列腺切除术后的一个重要问题。作为护理随访的一部分,我们对包括尿失禁恢复在内的生活质量(QoL)进行了评估。拟接受Retzius-sparing机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RS-RARP)的患者在术前和术后1周、1个月、3个月、6个月、9个月和12个月都要接受一系列的检查。其中,我们开始实施泌尿系统康复计划(URP),包括凯格尔运动、适应性策略和行为策略。目的是评估RS-RARP术后尿失禁恢复的时间表,因为这是我们的患者问得最多的问题之一。 材料和方法 2017 年 7 月至 2020 年 4 月期间,我们开展了一项前瞻性观察性单中心研究,共有 208 名患者接受了 RS-RARP 治疗。我们在术前和术后 3、6、9 和 12 个月采用了前列腺癌指数综合 26(EPIC-26)问卷,并通过评估第 3 个问题中测量的尿垫数量来研究尿意。纳入标准为:随访期间未接受辅助或挽救治疗的患者;术前和术后接受过所有评估;术前接受过大陆疗法;并开始接受尿潴留治疗。共纳入 72 例患者。我们将不使用尿垫作为尿失禁恢复的标准。每位患者都提供了书面知情同意书,并获得了机构伦理委员会的批准(批准日期:2017 年 7 月 7 日)。 结果 对入选患者的初步分析显示,57 名患者(79.16%)在 12 个月内恢复了大小便失禁。我们观察到,42 名患者(73.68%)在术后 3 个月恢复了排尿;7 名患者(12.28%)在术后 6 个月恢复了排尿;4 名患者(7.02%)在术后 9 个月恢复了排尿;4 名患者(7.02%)在术后 1 年恢复了排尿。我们进一步分析了 15 名(20.83%)在术后 12 个月出现尿失禁的患者每天使用的尿垫总数:13名患者(86.67%)表示每天使用 1 个尿垫,2 名患者(13.33%,占所有研究对象的 2.77%)表示每天使用 3 个或更多尿垫。 结论 初步结果表明,在第一年里,尿失禁情况逐渐得到了改善,相当多的患者在 3 个月后得到了康复。这些积极的结果很可能是手术方法和 URP 的结果。需要进行亚组分析,以进一步确定影响尿失禁恢复的因素,帮助制定术后康复护理计划,这将对与尿失禁快速恢复相关的生活质量产生积极影响。就后者而言,有必要使用数字工具进行患者报告结果,以确定对 QoL 的影响程度。此外,我们还需要重新考虑远程策略,以提高患者的依从性,因为有相当一部分患者因未参加现场护理预约而被排除在外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A 3-month mark to urinary continence, after robotic radical prostatectomy—Is it possible?

Introduction and Objectives

Urinary incontinence (UI) remains a significant concern after radical prostatectomy. As a part of a nursing follow-up, we evaluate quality-of-life (QoL) which includes UI recovery. Patients proposed to Retzius-sparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) have a bundle of appointments starting pre-operatively and continuing after surgery 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. In these, we started a urinary rehabilitation programme (URP) performing Kegel Exercises, adaptative and behavioural strategies. The objective is to evaluate timeline until urinary continence recovery after RS-RARP, since this is one of the most asked question by our patients.

Materials and Methods

Between July 2017 and April 2020 we conducted a prospective observational single-centre study with a total of 208 patients submitted to RS-RARP. We applied the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) questionnaire pre and postoperatively at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, and studied UI by evaluating pad count measured in the 3rd question. The inclusion criteria are: patients that did not have adjuvant or salvage treatments during the follow up; have all pre- and post-operative evaluations; who were continent pre-operatively; and started the URP. A total of 72 patients were included. We have considered the criteria of no pad use for continence recovery. Every patient provided written informed consent for study inclusion, approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (Approval 07.07.2017).

Results

Preliminary analysis of enrolled patients reveals that 57 (79,16%) recovered continence during the 12 months period. By 3-month mark, we observed that 42 (73,68%) patients were continent; 7 (12,28%) recovered continence at 6-month mark; 4 (7,02%) recovered continence at 9-month mark and 4 (7,02%) recovered continence 1 year after surgery. We further analysed the total number of pads used daily by the 15 patients (20,83%) that had UI at 12-month mark: 13 patients (86,67%) reported using 1 pad a day and 2 patients (13,33% or 2,77% of all studied population) reported using 3 or more pads a day.

Conclusion

The preliminary results demonstrate a gradual improvement in UI over the first year, with a significant number of patients recovering at 3-month mark. These positive results are most probably consequences of both the surgical approach and the URP. Is required a sub-group analysis to further delineate factors impacting continence recovery, aiding in postoperative rehabilitation care plans that will impact positive outcome on QoL associated with a fast UI recovery. For the latter, digital tools to conduct patient reported outcomes are necessary to ascertain the extent of impact in QoL. Furthermore, we need to rethink remote strategies to improve patient compliance as a significant number of them were excluded for not attending on-site nursing appointments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urological Nursing is an international peer-reviewed Journal for all nurses, non-specialist and specialist, who care for individuals with urological disorders. It is relevant for nurses working in a variety of settings: inpatient care, outpatient care, ambulatory care, community care, operating departments and specialist clinics. The Journal covers the whole spectrum of urological nursing skills and knowledge. It supports the publication of local issues of relevance to a wider international community to disseminate good practice. The International Journal of Urological Nursing is clinically focused, evidence-based and welcomes contributions in the following clinical and non-clinical areas: -General Urology- Continence care- Oncology- Andrology- Stoma care- Paediatric urology- Men’s health- Uro-gynaecology- Reconstructive surgery- Clinical audit- Clinical governance- Nurse-led services- Reflective analysis- Education- Management- Research- Leadership The Journal welcomes original research papers, practice development papers and literature reviews. It also invites shorter papers such as case reports, critical commentary, reflective analysis and reports of audit, as well as contributions to regular sections such as the media reviews section. The International Journal of Urological Nursing supports the development of academic writing within the specialty and particularly welcomes papers from young researchers or practitioners who are seeking to build a publication profile.
期刊最新文献
The effects of continuous care utilizing rational emotive therapy on prostate cancer patients Knowledge and practices of nurses working in urology clinics on fluid–electrolyte monitoring and management Postoperative nursing in robot-assisted urologic surgery: Are there any platform-based differences? Adherence and uncertainty during rehabilitation for urinary incontinence: Validation of a scale Assessing the reliability and usefulness of ChatGPT responses on intermittent catheterization queries: A critical analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1