微创肺叶切除术的新功能阈值

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006343
Stijn Vanstraelen, Kay See Tan, Joe Dycoco, Prasad S Adusumilli, Manjit S Bains, Matthew J Bott, Robert J Downey, Katherine D Gray, James Huang, James M Isbell, Daniela Molena, Bernard J Park, Valerie W Rusch, Smita Sihag, David R Jones, Gaetano Rocco
{"title":"微创肺叶切除术的新功能阈值","authors":"Stijn Vanstraelen, Kay See Tan, Joe Dycoco, Prasad S Adusumilli, Manjit S Bains, Matthew J Bott, Robert J Downey, Katherine D Gray, James Huang, James M Isbell, Daniela Molena, Bernard J Park, Valerie W Rusch, Smita Sihag, David R Jones, Gaetano Rocco","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the performance of a lower predicted postoperative (ppo) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) or diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO) threshold to predict cardiopulmonary complications after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) lobectomy.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Although MIS is associated with better postoperative outcomes than open surgery, MIS uses risk-assessment algorithms developed for open surgery. Moreover, several different definitions of cardiopulmonary complications are used for assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent MIS lobectomy for clinical stage I to II lung cancer from 2018 to 2022 at our institution were considered. The performance of a ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO threshold of <45% was compared against that of the current guideline threshold of <60%. Three different definitions of cardiopulmonary complications were compared: Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS), and Berry and colleagues' study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 946 patients, the ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO threshold of <45% was associated with a higher proportion correctly classified [79% (95% CI, 76%-81%) vs 65% (95% CI, 62%-68%); P <0.001]. The complication with the biggest difference in incidence between ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO of 45% to 60% and >60% was prolonged air leak [33 (13%) vs 34 (6%); P <0.001]. The predicted probability curves for cardiopulmonary complications were higher for the STS definition than for the ESTS or Berry definitions across ppoFEV 1 and ppoDLCO values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO threshold of <45% more accurately classified patients for cardiopulmonary complications after MIS lobectomy, emphasizing the need for updated risk-assessment guidelines for MIS lobectomy to optimize additional cardiopulmonary function evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1029-1037"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Functional Threshold for Minimally Invasive Lobectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Stijn Vanstraelen, Kay See Tan, Joe Dycoco, Prasad S Adusumilli, Manjit S Bains, Matthew J Bott, Robert J Downey, Katherine D Gray, James Huang, James M Isbell, Daniela Molena, Bernard J Park, Valerie W Rusch, Smita Sihag, David R Jones, Gaetano Rocco\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the performance of a lower predicted postoperative (ppo) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) or diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO) threshold to predict cardiopulmonary complications after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) lobectomy.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Although MIS is associated with better postoperative outcomes than open surgery, MIS uses risk-assessment algorithms developed for open surgery. Moreover, several different definitions of cardiopulmonary complications are used for assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent MIS lobectomy for clinical stage I to II lung cancer from 2018 to 2022 at our institution were considered. The performance of a ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO threshold of <45% was compared against that of the current guideline threshold of <60%. Three different definitions of cardiopulmonary complications were compared: Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS), and Berry and colleagues' study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 946 patients, the ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO threshold of <45% was associated with a higher proportion correctly classified [79% (95% CI, 76%-81%) vs 65% (95% CI, 62%-68%); P <0.001]. The complication with the biggest difference in incidence between ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO of 45% to 60% and >60% was prolonged air leak [33 (13%) vs 34 (6%); P <0.001]. The predicted probability curves for cardiopulmonary complications were higher for the STS definition than for the ESTS or Berry definitions across ppoFEV 1 and ppoDLCO values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO threshold of <45% more accurately classified patients for cardiopulmonary complications after MIS lobectomy, emphasizing the need for updated risk-assessment guidelines for MIS lobectomy to optimize additional cardiopulmonary function evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1029-1037\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006343\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006343","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估术后预测值(ppo)较低的1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)或一氧化碳肺弥散容量(DLCO)(ppoFEV1/ppoDLCO)阈值在预测微创手术(MIS)肺叶切除术后心肺并发症方面的性能:尽管微创手术的术后效果优于开放手术,但微创手术使用的是为开放手术开发的风险评估算法。此外,在评估心肺并发症时还使用了几种不同的定义:考虑2018年至2022年在我院接受MIS肺叶切除术的所有临床I-II期肺癌患者。结果:在946例患者中,ppoFEV1/ppoDLCO阈值的表现为ppoFEV1/ppoDLCO:在 946 例患者中,ppoFEV1/ppoDLCO 阈值为 60% 的患者漏气时间延长(33 [13%] vs. 34 [6%];PConclusions:pppoFEV1/ppoDLCO阈值的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A New Functional Threshold for Minimally Invasive Lobectomy.

Objective: To assess the performance of a lower predicted postoperative (ppo) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) or diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO) threshold to predict cardiopulmonary complications after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) lobectomy.

Background: Although MIS is associated with better postoperative outcomes than open surgery, MIS uses risk-assessment algorithms developed for open surgery. Moreover, several different definitions of cardiopulmonary complications are used for assessment.

Methods: All patients who underwent MIS lobectomy for clinical stage I to II lung cancer from 2018 to 2022 at our institution were considered. The performance of a ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO threshold of <45% was compared against that of the current guideline threshold of <60%. Three different definitions of cardiopulmonary complications were compared: Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS), and Berry and colleagues' study.

Results: In 946 patients, the ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO threshold of <45% was associated with a higher proportion correctly classified [79% (95% CI, 76%-81%) vs 65% (95% CI, 62%-68%); P <0.001]. The complication with the biggest difference in incidence between ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO of 45% to 60% and >60% was prolonged air leak [33 (13%) vs 34 (6%); P <0.001]. The predicted probability curves for cardiopulmonary complications were higher for the STS definition than for the ESTS or Berry definitions across ppoFEV 1 and ppoDLCO values.

Conclusions: The ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO threshold of <45% more accurately classified patients for cardiopulmonary complications after MIS lobectomy, emphasizing the need for updated risk-assessment guidelines for MIS lobectomy to optimize additional cardiopulmonary function evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
期刊最新文献
The Association Between Pediatric Readiness and Mortality for Injured Children Treated at US Trauma Centers. The Role of Adjuvant Therapy in Duodenal Adenocarcinoma and Intestinal Subtype Ampullary Carcinoma After Curative Resection. Association of Prophylactic Antibiotics With Early Infectious Complications in Children With Cancer Undergoing Central Venous Access Device Placement. Cure Probabilities After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of 2554 Patients. Pancreatic Cancer: An Exocrine Tumor With Endocrine Characteristics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1