{"title":"颞骨副神经节瘤内窥镜与显微镜切除术的成功率和安全性：一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Hen Chaushu, Fares Butrus, Yahav Oron, Ophir Handzel, Rani Abu-Eta, Nidal Muhanna, Omer J Ungar","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-08720-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Temporal bone paraganglioma (TBP) are the most common tumors of the middle ear. They pose a challenge in otologic surgery due to their extensive vascularity and intricate location within the middle ear. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of two surgical approaches, microscopic middle ear surgery (MMES) and endoscopic middle ear surgery (EMES), in the resection of TBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible studies published after 1988 were identified through systematic searches of \"PubMed\", \"Scopus\" and \"Google Scholar\". Retrospective studies and randomized/non-randomized control trials reporting on surgical approaches for TBP with a minimum of five adult patients were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 595 records were initially identified. After removing 229 duplicates, 349 articles were excluded based upon article subject, title and abstract. Following the review of full texts, 13 articles were assessed for eligibility. The pooled analysis included a total of 529 ears, with a complication rate of 7.8% for EMES and 14.2% for MMES. Subgroup differences indicated no significant variation between the two methods (p = 0.2945).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both EMES and MMES demonstrated favorable surgical outcomes with low complication rates for TBP resection. These findings suggest that EMES is a safe and effective method for TBP resection and one that is comparable to MMES. Since the risk of bleeding is significant in these tumors, a third-hand technique, endoscopic bipolar cautery or laser-assisted hemostasis should be considered. Conversion to MMES is another option when visibility is critically affected by bleeding.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Success and safety of endoscopic versus microscopic resection of temporal bone paraganglioma: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hen Chaushu, Fares Butrus, Yahav Oron, Ophir Handzel, Rani Abu-Eta, Nidal Muhanna, Omer J Ungar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-024-08720-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Temporal bone paraganglioma (TBP) are the most common tumors of the middle ear. They pose a challenge in otologic surgery due to their extensive vascularity and intricate location within the middle ear. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of two surgical approaches, microscopic middle ear surgery (MMES) and endoscopic middle ear surgery (EMES), in the resection of TBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible studies published after 1988 were identified through systematic searches of \\\"PubMed\\\", \\\"Scopus\\\" and \\\"Google Scholar\\\". Retrospective studies and randomized/non-randomized control trials reporting on surgical approaches for TBP with a minimum of five adult patients were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 595 records were initially identified. After removing 229 duplicates, 349 articles were excluded based upon article subject, title and abstract. Following the review of full texts, 13 articles were assessed for eligibility. The pooled analysis included a total of 529 ears, with a complication rate of 7.8% for EMES and 14.2% for MMES. Subgroup differences indicated no significant variation between the two methods (p = 0.2945).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both EMES and MMES demonstrated favorable surgical outcomes with low complication rates for TBP resection. These findings suggest that EMES is a safe and effective method for TBP resection and one that is comparable to MMES. Since the risk of bleeding is significant in these tumors, a third-hand technique, endoscopic bipolar cautery or laser-assisted hemostasis should be considered. Conversion to MMES is another option when visibility is critically affected by bleeding.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08720-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08720-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Success and safety of endoscopic versus microscopic resection of temporal bone paraganglioma: a meta-analysis.
Purpose: Temporal bone paraganglioma (TBP) are the most common tumors of the middle ear. They pose a challenge in otologic surgery due to their extensive vascularity and intricate location within the middle ear. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of two surgical approaches, microscopic middle ear surgery (MMES) and endoscopic middle ear surgery (EMES), in the resection of TBP.
Methods: Eligible studies published after 1988 were identified through systematic searches of "PubMed", "Scopus" and "Google Scholar". Retrospective studies and randomized/non-randomized control trials reporting on surgical approaches for TBP with a minimum of five adult patients were included.
Results: A total of 595 records were initially identified. After removing 229 duplicates, 349 articles were excluded based upon article subject, title and abstract. Following the review of full texts, 13 articles were assessed for eligibility. The pooled analysis included a total of 529 ears, with a complication rate of 7.8% for EMES and 14.2% for MMES. Subgroup differences indicated no significant variation between the two methods (p = 0.2945).
Conclusion: Both EMES and MMES demonstrated favorable surgical outcomes with low complication rates for TBP resection. These findings suggest that EMES is a safe and effective method for TBP resection and one that is comparable to MMES. Since the risk of bleeding is significant in these tumors, a third-hand technique, endoscopic bipolar cautery or laser-assisted hemostasis should be considered. Conversion to MMES is another option when visibility is critically affected by bleeding.
期刊介绍：
Official Journal of
European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board
Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery
"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level.
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
