机器人经肛门微创手术(R-TAMIS):治疗早期直肠肿瘤的现有证据。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY International Journal of Colorectal Disease Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1007/s00384-024-04645-4
Niall J O'Sullivan, Hugo C Temperley, John Larkin, Jacob J McCormick, Emanuele Rausa, Paul McCormick, Alexander Heriot, Brian J Mehigan, Satish Warrier, Michael E Kelly
{"title":"机器人经肛门微创手术(R-TAMIS):治疗早期直肠肿瘤的现有证据。","authors":"Niall J O'Sullivan, Hugo C Temperley, John Larkin, Jacob J McCormick, Emanuele Rausa, Paul McCormick, Alexander Heriot, Brian J Mehigan, Satish Warrier, Michael E Kelly","doi":"10.1007/s00384-024-04645-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS) was introduced in 2012 for the excision of benign rectal polyps and low grade rectal cancer. Ergonomic improvements over traditional laparoscopic TAMIS (L-TAMIS) include increased dexterity within a small operative field, with possibility of better surgical precision. We aim to collate the existing data surrounding the use of R-TAMIS to treat rectal neoplasms from cohort studies and larger case series, providing a foundation for future, large-scale, comparative studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched as part of our review. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies or large case series (≥ 5 patients) investigating the use of R-TAMIS to resect rectal neoplasia (benign or malignant) were eligible for inclusion in our analysis. Quality assessment of included studies was performed via the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) risk of bias tool. Outcomes extracted included basic participant characteristics, operative details and histopathological/oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies on 317 participants were included in our analysis. The quality of studies was generally satisfactory. Overall complication rate from R-TAMIS was 9.7%. Clear margins (R0) were reported in 96.2% of patients. Local recurrence (benign or malignant) occurred in 2.2% of patients during the specified follow-up periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our review highlights the current evidence for R-TAMIS in the local excision of rectal lesions. While R-TAMIS appears to have complication, margin negativity and recurrence rates superior to those of published L-TAMIS series, comparative studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11082025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS): current evidence in the treatment of early rectal neoplasia.\",\"authors\":\"Niall J O'Sullivan, Hugo C Temperley, John Larkin, Jacob J McCormick, Emanuele Rausa, Paul McCormick, Alexander Heriot, Brian J Mehigan, Satish Warrier, Michael E Kelly\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00384-024-04645-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS) was introduced in 2012 for the excision of benign rectal polyps and low grade rectal cancer. Ergonomic improvements over traditional laparoscopic TAMIS (L-TAMIS) include increased dexterity within a small operative field, with possibility of better surgical precision. We aim to collate the existing data surrounding the use of R-TAMIS to treat rectal neoplasms from cohort studies and larger case series, providing a foundation for future, large-scale, comparative studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched as part of our review. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies or large case series (≥ 5 patients) investigating the use of R-TAMIS to resect rectal neoplasia (benign or malignant) were eligible for inclusion in our analysis. Quality assessment of included studies was performed via the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) risk of bias tool. Outcomes extracted included basic participant characteristics, operative details and histopathological/oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies on 317 participants were included in our analysis. The quality of studies was generally satisfactory. Overall complication rate from R-TAMIS was 9.7%. Clear margins (R0) were reported in 96.2% of patients. Local recurrence (benign or malignant) occurred in 2.2% of patients during the specified follow-up periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our review highlights the current evidence for R-TAMIS in the local excision of rectal lesions. While R-TAMIS appears to have complication, margin negativity and recurrence rates superior to those of published L-TAMIS series, comparative studies are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Colorectal Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11082025/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Colorectal Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04645-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04645-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介机器人经肛门微创手术(R-TAMIS)于 2012 年推出,用于切除良性直肠息肉和低位直肠癌。与传统的腹腔镜经肛门微创手术(L-TAMIS)相比,机器人经肛门微创手术在人体工程学方面有所改进,包括在较小的手术视野内提高了灵巧性,使手术精度更高。我们旨在整理有关使用 R-TAMIS 治疗直肠肿瘤的现有数据,这些数据来自队列研究和大型病例系列研究,为未来的大规模比较研究奠定基础:方法:作为综述的一部分,我们检索了 Medline、EMBASE 和 Web of Science。研究使用 R-TAMIS 对直肠肿瘤(良性或恶性)进行切除的随机对照试验 (RCT)、队列研究或大型病例系列(≥ 5 名患者)均符合纳入分析的条件。通过纽卡斯尔渥太华量表(NOS)偏倚风险工具对纳入研究进行质量评估。提取的结果包括参与者的基本特征、手术细节和组织病理学/肿瘤学结果:我们的分析共纳入了 18 项研究,涉及 317 名参与者。研究质量总体上令人满意。R-TAMIS的总体并发症发生率为9.7%。96.2%的患者边缘清晰(R0)。在规定的随访期内,2.2%的患者出现局部复发(良性或恶性):我们的综述强调了目前 R-TAMIS 用于直肠病变局部切除的证据。虽然 R-TAMIS 的并发症、边缘阴性率和复发率似乎优于已发表的 L-TAMIS 系列,但仍需进行比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS): current evidence in the treatment of early rectal neoplasia.

Introduction: Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS) was introduced in 2012 for the excision of benign rectal polyps and low grade rectal cancer. Ergonomic improvements over traditional laparoscopic TAMIS (L-TAMIS) include increased dexterity within a small operative field, with possibility of better surgical precision. We aim to collate the existing data surrounding the use of R-TAMIS to treat rectal neoplasms from cohort studies and larger case series, providing a foundation for future, large-scale, comparative studies.

Methods: Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched as part of our review. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies or large case series (≥ 5 patients) investigating the use of R-TAMIS to resect rectal neoplasia (benign or malignant) were eligible for inclusion in our analysis. Quality assessment of included studies was performed via the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) risk of bias tool. Outcomes extracted included basic participant characteristics, operative details and histopathological/oncological outcomes.

Results: Eighteen studies on 317 participants were included in our analysis. The quality of studies was generally satisfactory. Overall complication rate from R-TAMIS was 9.7%. Clear margins (R0) were reported in 96.2% of patients. Local recurrence (benign or malignant) occurred in 2.2% of patients during the specified follow-up periods.

Conclusion: Our review highlights the current evidence for R-TAMIS in the local excision of rectal lesions. While R-TAMIS appears to have complication, margin negativity and recurrence rates superior to those of published L-TAMIS series, comparative studies are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
期刊最新文献
Risk of metachronous colorectal cancer associated with polypectomy during endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal cancer. A multi-docking strategy for robotic LAR and deep pelvic surgery with the Hugo RAS system: experience from a tertiary referral center. Does the initial treatment of primary tumor impact prognosis after recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer? Results from a retrospective cohort analysis. Effect of powered circular stapler in colorectal anastomosis after left-sided colic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Subcutaneous infliximab in Crohn's disease patients with previous immunogenic failure of intravenous infliximab.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1