利用排队理论优化药物调节:计算机实验。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1007/s11096-024-01722-0
W J Kruik-Kollöffel, G A W Moltman, M D Wu, A Braaksma, F Karapinar, R J Boucherie
{"title":"利用排队理论优化药物调节:计算机实验。","authors":"W J Kruik-Kollöffel, G A W Moltman, M D Wu, A Braaksma, F Karapinar, R J Boucherie","doi":"10.1007/s11096-024-01722-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication reconciliation (MedRec) in hospitals is an important tool to enhance the continuity of care, but completing MedRec is challenging.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate whether queueing theory could be used to compare various interventions to optimise the MedRec process to ultimately reduce the number of patients discharged prior to MedRec being completed. Queueing theory, the mathematical study of waiting lines or queues, has not been previously applied in hospital pharmacies but enables comparisons without interfering with the baseline workflow.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Possible interventions to enhance the MedRec process (replacing in-person conversations with telephone conversations, reallocating pharmacy technicians (PTs) or adjusting their working schedule) were compared in a computer experiment. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with an incomplete discharge MedRec. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it was possible to add a real-life post hoc intervention (PTs starting their shift later) to the theoretical interventions. Descriptive analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The queueing model showed that the number of patients with an incomplete discharge MedRec decreased from 37.2% in the original scenario to approximately 16% when the PTs started their shift 2 h earlier and 1 PT was reassigned to prepare the discharge MedRec. The number increased with the real-life post hoc intervention (PTs starting later), which matches a decrease in the computer experiment when started earlier.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using queueing theory in a computer experiment could identify the most promising theoretical intervention to decrease the percentage of patients discharged prior to MedRec being completed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimisation of medication reconciliation using queueing theory: a computer experiment.\",\"authors\":\"W J Kruik-Kollöffel, G A W Moltman, M D Wu, A Braaksma, F Karapinar, R J Boucherie\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11096-024-01722-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication reconciliation (MedRec) in hospitals is an important tool to enhance the continuity of care, but completing MedRec is challenging.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate whether queueing theory could be used to compare various interventions to optimise the MedRec process to ultimately reduce the number of patients discharged prior to MedRec being completed. Queueing theory, the mathematical study of waiting lines or queues, has not been previously applied in hospital pharmacies but enables comparisons without interfering with the baseline workflow.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Possible interventions to enhance the MedRec process (replacing in-person conversations with telephone conversations, reallocating pharmacy technicians (PTs) or adjusting their working schedule) were compared in a computer experiment. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with an incomplete discharge MedRec. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it was possible to add a real-life post hoc intervention (PTs starting their shift later) to the theoretical interventions. Descriptive analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The queueing model showed that the number of patients with an incomplete discharge MedRec decreased from 37.2% in the original scenario to approximately 16% when the PTs started their shift 2 h earlier and 1 PT was reassigned to prepare the discharge MedRec. The number increased with the real-life post hoc intervention (PTs starting later), which matches a decrease in the computer experiment when started earlier.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using queueing theory in a computer experiment could identify the most promising theoretical intervention to decrease the percentage of patients discharged prior to MedRec being completed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01722-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01722-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:本研究旨在探讨是否可以使用排队理论来比较各种干预措施,以优化用药核对流程,最终减少在用药核对完成前出院的患者人数。排队理论是对等待线或队列的数学研究,以前从未在医院药房中应用过,但可以在不干扰基线工作流程的情况下进行比较:方法:在计算机实验中比较了加强医疗记录流程的可能干预措施(用电话交谈取代面对面交谈、重新分配药房技术人员(PTs)或调整他们的工作时间表)。主要结果是出院医疗记录不完整的患者比例。由于 COVID-19 大流行,在理论干预的基础上增加了一项现实生活中的事后干预(药剂师推迟上班时间)。对结果进行了描述性分析:排队模型显示,当护理人员提前 2 小时开始轮班,并重新指派 1 名护理人员准备出院医疗记录时,出院医疗记录不完整的患者人数从最初方案的 37.2% 降至约 16%。现实生活中的事后干预(PT 开始得晚一些)使这一数字上升,这与计算机实验中提前开始时的下降相吻合:结论:在计算机实验中使用排队理论,可以找出最有希望的理论干预措施,以降低在医疗记录完成前出院病人的比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimisation of medication reconciliation using queueing theory: a computer experiment.

Background: Medication reconciliation (MedRec) in hospitals is an important tool to enhance the continuity of care, but completing MedRec is challenging.

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate whether queueing theory could be used to compare various interventions to optimise the MedRec process to ultimately reduce the number of patients discharged prior to MedRec being completed. Queueing theory, the mathematical study of waiting lines or queues, has not been previously applied in hospital pharmacies but enables comparisons without interfering with the baseline workflow.

Method: Possible interventions to enhance the MedRec process (replacing in-person conversations with telephone conversations, reallocating pharmacy technicians (PTs) or adjusting their working schedule) were compared in a computer experiment. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with an incomplete discharge MedRec. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it was possible to add a real-life post hoc intervention (PTs starting their shift later) to the theoretical interventions. Descriptive analysis was performed.

Results: The queueing model showed that the number of patients with an incomplete discharge MedRec decreased from 37.2% in the original scenario to approximately 16% when the PTs started their shift 2 h earlier and 1 PT was reassigned to prepare the discharge MedRec. The number increased with the real-life post hoc intervention (PTs starting later), which matches a decrease in the computer experiment when started earlier.

Conclusion: Using queueing theory in a computer experiment could identify the most promising theoretical intervention to decrease the percentage of patients discharged prior to MedRec being completed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the impact of baseline platelet count on linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia: a retrospective single-center observation study. Sentiment analysis in medication adherence: using ruled-based and artificial intelligence-driven algorithms to understand patient medication experiences. Translation and validation of the CLEO tool in Vietnamese to assess the significance of pharmacist interventions. Association of polypharmacy with clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization in older adults with cardiometabolic diseases: a retrospective cohort study. Correction: Development and validation of a Medication Adherence Universal Questionnaire: the MAUQ.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1