为初级保健提供者设计关于社会健康整合和社会风险知情护理的在线继续医学教育。

Q2 Social Sciences The Permanente journal Pub Date : 2024-06-14 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.7812/TPP/23.113
Meagan C Brown, Andrea R Paolino, Katheen A Barnes, Dea Papajorgji-Taylor, Loel S Solomon, Cara C Lewis, Elizabeth Bojkov, Katie F Coleman
{"title":"为初级保健提供者设计关于社会健康整合和社会风险知情护理的在线继续医学教育。","authors":"Meagan C Brown, Andrea R Paolino, Katheen A Barnes, Dea Papajorgji-Taylor, Loel S Solomon, Cara C Lewis, Elizabeth Bojkov, Katie F Coleman","doi":"10.7812/TPP/23.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adapting clinical care decisions for patient-reported social risks is essential to social health integration and patient-centered care. Most research in this area focuses on awareness and assistance (social-needs-targeted care), such as screening and referral to food, financial, and other resources. Limited evidence for adjustment strategies (social risk-informed care) or adapting care for social risks made it difficult for Kaiser Permanente to implement new initiatives. This article describes a codesign process to build a novel, adjustment-focused continuing medical education course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors codeveloped the online continuing medical education course with patients and clinicians using user-centered design. Transcripts from codesign activities were coded and analyzed by thematic analysis to identify major themes, including perceptions of social risk-informed care and barriers to care adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Practical hurdles for implementing social risk-informed care emerged, including clinicians' concerns about the ethics of adjustment as substandard care, particularly without robust assistance activities. However, patients expressed a desire for their care to be adapted to their social circumstances, to allow for more realistic care plans.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Implementation barriers identified from the codesign were addressed through an interactive, case-study approach. Existing evidence on contextualized care and shared decision making informed a general framework for primary care providers to engage in awareness and adjustment activities, paired with 3 interactive case studies based on real-world, clinician-supplied scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The authors recommend that multiple stakeholder perspectives be incorporated during the development of social health integration initiatives, particularly adjustment. Education complemented by active, nuanced, flexible implementation strategies may be necessary for the successful uptake of care-delivery-based social health integration activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"26-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Codesigning Online Continuing Medical Education on Social Health Integration and Social Risk-Informed Care for Primary Care Providers.\",\"authors\":\"Meagan C Brown, Andrea R Paolino, Katheen A Barnes, Dea Papajorgji-Taylor, Loel S Solomon, Cara C Lewis, Elizabeth Bojkov, Katie F Coleman\",\"doi\":\"10.7812/TPP/23.113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adapting clinical care decisions for patient-reported social risks is essential to social health integration and patient-centered care. Most research in this area focuses on awareness and assistance (social-needs-targeted care), such as screening and referral to food, financial, and other resources. Limited evidence for adjustment strategies (social risk-informed care) or adapting care for social risks made it difficult for Kaiser Permanente to implement new initiatives. This article describes a codesign process to build a novel, adjustment-focused continuing medical education course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors codeveloped the online continuing medical education course with patients and clinicians using user-centered design. Transcripts from codesign activities were coded and analyzed by thematic analysis to identify major themes, including perceptions of social risk-informed care and barriers to care adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Practical hurdles for implementing social risk-informed care emerged, including clinicians' concerns about the ethics of adjustment as substandard care, particularly without robust assistance activities. However, patients expressed a desire for their care to be adapted to their social circumstances, to allow for more realistic care plans.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Implementation barriers identified from the codesign were addressed through an interactive, case-study approach. Existing evidence on contextualized care and shared decision making informed a general framework for primary care providers to engage in awareness and adjustment activities, paired with 3 interactive case studies based on real-world, clinician-supplied scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The authors recommend that multiple stakeholder perspectives be incorporated during the development of social health integration initiatives, particularly adjustment. Education complemented by active, nuanced, flexible implementation strategies may be necessary for the successful uptake of care-delivery-based social health integration activities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Permanente journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"26-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232908/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Permanente journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/23.113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanente journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/23.113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:根据患者报告的社会风险调整临床护理决策对于社会健康整合和以患者为中心的护理至关重要。该领域的大多数研究都集中在认识和援助(针对社会需求的护理)方面,如筛查和转介食物、财务和其他资源。调整策略(社会风险知情护理)或针对社会风险调整护理的证据有限,这使得 Kaiser Permanente 难以实施新举措。本文介绍了一个共同设计过程,以建立一个新颖的、以调整为重点的继续医学教育课程:作者采用以用户为中心的设计方法,与患者和临床医生共同开发了在线继续医学教育课程。通过主题分析法对共同设计活动的记录进行编码和分析,以确定主要的主题,包括对社会风险知情护理的看法和护理调整的障碍:结果:实施社会风险知情护理的实际障碍显现出来,包括临床医生担心调整护理的道德标准不达标,尤其是在没有强有力的援助活动的情况下。然而,患者表示希望护理能适应他们的社会环境,以便制定更切合实际的护理计划:讨论:通过互动、案例研究的方法解决了共同设计中发现的实施障碍。关于情景化护理和共同决策的现有证据为初级保健提供者参与认识和调整活动提供了一个总体框架,同时还根据临床医生提供的真实情景进行了 3 个互动案例研究:作者建议,在制定社会健康一体化倡议时,应纳入多方利益相关者的观点,尤其是调整观点。教育与积极、细致、灵活的实施策略相辅相成,可能是成功开展以医疗服务为基础的社会健康整合活动的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Codesigning Online Continuing Medical Education on Social Health Integration and Social Risk-Informed Care for Primary Care Providers.

Introduction: Adapting clinical care decisions for patient-reported social risks is essential to social health integration and patient-centered care. Most research in this area focuses on awareness and assistance (social-needs-targeted care), such as screening and referral to food, financial, and other resources. Limited evidence for adjustment strategies (social risk-informed care) or adapting care for social risks made it difficult for Kaiser Permanente to implement new initiatives. This article describes a codesign process to build a novel, adjustment-focused continuing medical education course.

Methods: The authors codeveloped the online continuing medical education course with patients and clinicians using user-centered design. Transcripts from codesign activities were coded and analyzed by thematic analysis to identify major themes, including perceptions of social risk-informed care and barriers to care adjustment.

Results: Practical hurdles for implementing social risk-informed care emerged, including clinicians' concerns about the ethics of adjustment as substandard care, particularly without robust assistance activities. However, patients expressed a desire for their care to be adapted to their social circumstances, to allow for more realistic care plans.

Discussion: Implementation barriers identified from the codesign were addressed through an interactive, case-study approach. Existing evidence on contextualized care and shared decision making informed a general framework for primary care providers to engage in awareness and adjustment activities, paired with 3 interactive case studies based on real-world, clinician-supplied scenarios.

Conclusion: The authors recommend that multiple stakeholder perspectives be incorporated during the development of social health integration initiatives, particularly adjustment. Education complemented by active, nuanced, flexible implementation strategies may be necessary for the successful uptake of care-delivery-based social health integration activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Permanente journal
The Permanente journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
期刊最新文献
Survey of Orthopedic Surgeons' Perceptions of Adopting an Initiative With Cemented Hip Hemiarthroplasties for Fractures. Impact of the Graphic Memoir My Degeneration: A Journey Through Parkinson's on Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Mixed Methods Study. A Comparison of In-Person and Telemedicine Triage in Otolaryngology. Delusional Parasitosis in a Patient With a History of COVID-19 and Substance Use Disorder. Erratum to Vitamin D Deficiency-Associated Neuropathic Pain Examined in a Chronic Pain Management Program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1