Meagan C Brown, Andrea R Paolino, Katheen A Barnes, Dea Papajorgji-Taylor, Loel S Solomon, Cara C Lewis, Elizabeth Bojkov, Katie F Coleman
{"title":"为初级保健提供者设计关于社会健康整合和社会风险知情护理的在线继续医学教育。","authors":"Meagan C Brown, Andrea R Paolino, Katheen A Barnes, Dea Papajorgji-Taylor, Loel S Solomon, Cara C Lewis, Elizabeth Bojkov, Katie F Coleman","doi":"10.7812/TPP/23.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adapting clinical care decisions for patient-reported social risks is essential to social health integration and patient-centered care. Most research in this area focuses on awareness and assistance (social-needs-targeted care), such as screening and referral to food, financial, and other resources. Limited evidence for adjustment strategies (social risk-informed care) or adapting care for social risks made it difficult for Kaiser Permanente to implement new initiatives. This article describes a codesign process to build a novel, adjustment-focused continuing medical education course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors codeveloped the online continuing medical education course with patients and clinicians using user-centered design. Transcripts from codesign activities were coded and analyzed by thematic analysis to identify major themes, including perceptions of social risk-informed care and barriers to care adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Practical hurdles for implementing social risk-informed care emerged, including clinicians' concerns about the ethics of adjustment as substandard care, particularly without robust assistance activities. However, patients expressed a desire for their care to be adapted to their social circumstances, to allow for more realistic care plans.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Implementation barriers identified from the codesign were addressed through an interactive, case-study approach. Existing evidence on contextualized care and shared decision making informed a general framework for primary care providers to engage in awareness and adjustment activities, paired with 3 interactive case studies based on real-world, clinician-supplied scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The authors recommend that multiple stakeholder perspectives be incorporated during the development of social health integration initiatives, particularly adjustment. Education complemented by active, nuanced, flexible implementation strategies may be necessary for the successful uptake of care-delivery-based social health integration activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"26-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Codesigning Online Continuing Medical Education on Social Health Integration and Social Risk-Informed Care for Primary Care Providers.\",\"authors\":\"Meagan C Brown, Andrea R Paolino, Katheen A Barnes, Dea Papajorgji-Taylor, Loel S Solomon, Cara C Lewis, Elizabeth Bojkov, Katie F Coleman\",\"doi\":\"10.7812/TPP/23.113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adapting clinical care decisions for patient-reported social risks is essential to social health integration and patient-centered care. Most research in this area focuses on awareness and assistance (social-needs-targeted care), such as screening and referral to food, financial, and other resources. Limited evidence for adjustment strategies (social risk-informed care) or adapting care for social risks made it difficult for Kaiser Permanente to implement new initiatives. This article describes a codesign process to build a novel, adjustment-focused continuing medical education course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors codeveloped the online continuing medical education course with patients and clinicians using user-centered design. Transcripts from codesign activities were coded and analyzed by thematic analysis to identify major themes, including perceptions of social risk-informed care and barriers to care adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Practical hurdles for implementing social risk-informed care emerged, including clinicians' concerns about the ethics of adjustment as substandard care, particularly without robust assistance activities. However, patients expressed a desire for their care to be adapted to their social circumstances, to allow for more realistic care plans.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Implementation barriers identified from the codesign were addressed through an interactive, case-study approach. Existing evidence on contextualized care and shared decision making informed a general framework for primary care providers to engage in awareness and adjustment activities, paired with 3 interactive case studies based on real-world, clinician-supplied scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The authors recommend that multiple stakeholder perspectives be incorporated during the development of social health integration initiatives, particularly adjustment. Education complemented by active, nuanced, flexible implementation strategies may be necessary for the successful uptake of care-delivery-based social health integration activities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Permanente journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"26-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232908/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Permanente journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/23.113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanente journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/23.113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
介绍:根据患者报告的社会风险调整临床护理决策对于社会健康整合和以患者为中心的护理至关重要。该领域的大多数研究都集中在认识和援助(针对社会需求的护理)方面,如筛查和转介食物、财务和其他资源。调整策略(社会风险知情护理)或针对社会风险调整护理的证据有限,这使得 Kaiser Permanente 难以实施新举措。本文介绍了一个共同设计过程,以建立一个新颖的、以调整为重点的继续医学教育课程:作者采用以用户为中心的设计方法,与患者和临床医生共同开发了在线继续医学教育课程。通过主题分析法对共同设计活动的记录进行编码和分析,以确定主要的主题,包括对社会风险知情护理的看法和护理调整的障碍:结果:实施社会风险知情护理的实际障碍显现出来,包括临床医生担心调整护理的道德标准不达标,尤其是在没有强有力的援助活动的情况下。然而,患者表示希望护理能适应他们的社会环境,以便制定更切合实际的护理计划:讨论:通过互动、案例研究的方法解决了共同设计中发现的实施障碍。关于情景化护理和共同决策的现有证据为初级保健提供者参与认识和调整活动提供了一个总体框架,同时还根据临床医生提供的真实情景进行了 3 个互动案例研究:作者建议,在制定社会健康一体化倡议时,应纳入多方利益相关者的观点,尤其是调整观点。教育与积极、细致、灵活的实施策略相辅相成,可能是成功开展以医疗服务为基础的社会健康整合活动的必要条件。
Codesigning Online Continuing Medical Education on Social Health Integration and Social Risk-Informed Care for Primary Care Providers.
Introduction: Adapting clinical care decisions for patient-reported social risks is essential to social health integration and patient-centered care. Most research in this area focuses on awareness and assistance (social-needs-targeted care), such as screening and referral to food, financial, and other resources. Limited evidence for adjustment strategies (social risk-informed care) or adapting care for social risks made it difficult for Kaiser Permanente to implement new initiatives. This article describes a codesign process to build a novel, adjustment-focused continuing medical education course.
Methods: The authors codeveloped the online continuing medical education course with patients and clinicians using user-centered design. Transcripts from codesign activities were coded and analyzed by thematic analysis to identify major themes, including perceptions of social risk-informed care and barriers to care adjustment.
Results: Practical hurdles for implementing social risk-informed care emerged, including clinicians' concerns about the ethics of adjustment as substandard care, particularly without robust assistance activities. However, patients expressed a desire for their care to be adapted to their social circumstances, to allow for more realistic care plans.
Discussion: Implementation barriers identified from the codesign were addressed through an interactive, case-study approach. Existing evidence on contextualized care and shared decision making informed a general framework for primary care providers to engage in awareness and adjustment activities, paired with 3 interactive case studies based on real-world, clinician-supplied scenarios.
Conclusion: The authors recommend that multiple stakeholder perspectives be incorporated during the development of social health integration initiatives, particularly adjustment. Education complemented by active, nuanced, flexible implementation strategies may be necessary for the successful uptake of care-delivery-based social health integration activities.