探究社交媒体对家长疫苗决策的影响:一项网络研究。

Q2 Medicine Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy Pub Date : 2024-05-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25151355241249607
Susan E Smith, Nina Sivertsen, Lauren Lines, Anita De Bellis
{"title":"探究社交媒体对家长疫苗决策的影响:一项网络研究。","authors":"Susan E Smith, Nina Sivertsen, Lauren Lines, Anita De Bellis","doi":"10.1177/25151355241249607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immunization is one of the most significant health initiatives of recent times. Despite this, vaccine hesitancy is increasing and was listed as one of the top 10 threats to global health by the World Health Organization in 2019. A major factor associated with vaccine hesitancy is thought to be the viral spread of misinformation by a small but active anti-vaccination movement.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to explore the influences of social media on vaccine decision-making in parents.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is part of a larger body of research that explored vaccine decision-making in parents. Other methods included were an online survey and semi-structured interviews. This study investigated the influence of cyberculture on parents in an online environment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study employed netnography, a form of qualitative inquiry with its roots in ethnography as methodology and a purpose-designed Facebook page as the means of exploring a purpose-designed online community with a particular focus on the culture, belief systems and influences present. Both manual and computer-assisted thematic analyses were used to analyse the data obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three key themes were identified in this study. These included vaccine safety concerns, the emotional debate and COVID-19-specific issues. The results indicated the presence of strong anti-vaccination sentiment combined with an 'infodemic' of conspiracy theories, misinformation and vitriol with the potential to negatively impact parents seeking immunization information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the popularity and accessibility of social media and the ready access to misinformation present online, it is evident that parental vaccine decision-making may be impacted adversely. Therefore, it is important that healthcare professionals are aware of this and provide adequate and timely education prior to parents seeking information on social media.</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":"12 ","pages":"25151355241249607"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11080448/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring social media influences on vaccine decision-making in parents: a netnography.\",\"authors\":\"Susan E Smith, Nina Sivertsen, Lauren Lines, Anita De Bellis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25151355241249607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immunization is one of the most significant health initiatives of recent times. Despite this, vaccine hesitancy is increasing and was listed as one of the top 10 threats to global health by the World Health Organization in 2019. A major factor associated with vaccine hesitancy is thought to be the viral spread of misinformation by a small but active anti-vaccination movement.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to explore the influences of social media on vaccine decision-making in parents.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is part of a larger body of research that explored vaccine decision-making in parents. Other methods included were an online survey and semi-structured interviews. This study investigated the influence of cyberculture on parents in an online environment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study employed netnography, a form of qualitative inquiry with its roots in ethnography as methodology and a purpose-designed Facebook page as the means of exploring a purpose-designed online community with a particular focus on the culture, belief systems and influences present. Both manual and computer-assisted thematic analyses were used to analyse the data obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three key themes were identified in this study. These included vaccine safety concerns, the emotional debate and COVID-19-specific issues. The results indicated the presence of strong anti-vaccination sentiment combined with an 'infodemic' of conspiracy theories, misinformation and vitriol with the potential to negatively impact parents seeking immunization information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the popularity and accessibility of social media and the ready access to misinformation present online, it is evident that parental vaccine decision-making may be impacted adversely. Therefore, it is important that healthcare professionals are aware of this and provide adequate and timely education prior to parents seeking information on social media.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"25151355241249607\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11080448/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355241249607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355241249607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:免疫接种是近代最重要的卫生举措之一。尽管如此,疫苗接种犹豫却在不断增加,并被世界卫生组织列为 2019 年全球健康十大威胁之一。与疫苗接种犹豫有关的一个主要因素被认为是小规模但活跃的反疫苗接种运动对错误信息的病毒式传播:本研究旨在探讨社交媒体对家长疫苗决策的影响:本研究是探索家长疫苗决策的大型研究的一部分。其他方法包括在线调查和半结构化访谈。本研究调查了网络文化在网络环境中对家长的影响:本研究采用了一种源于人种学的定性调查形式--网络志(netnography)作为研究方法,并以一个专门设计的 Facebook 页面为手段,对一个专门设计的网络社区进行探索,尤其关注其文化、信仰体系和影响因素。研究采用人工和计算机辅助主题分析方法对所获得的数据进行分析:本研究确定了三个关键主题。这些主题包括疫苗安全问题、情感辩论和 COVID-19 具体问题。结果表明,强烈的反疫苗接种情绪与阴谋论、错误信息和谩骂的 "信息流行 "相结合,可能会对寻求免疫信息的家长产生负面影响:鉴于社交媒体的普及性和可访问性,以及随时可在网上获取的错误信息,家长的疫苗接种决策显然可能会受到负面影响。因此,医疗保健专业人员必须意识到这一点,并在家长通过社交媒体寻求信息之前提供充分、及时的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring social media influences on vaccine decision-making in parents: a netnography.

Background: Immunization is one of the most significant health initiatives of recent times. Despite this, vaccine hesitancy is increasing and was listed as one of the top 10 threats to global health by the World Health Organization in 2019. A major factor associated with vaccine hesitancy is thought to be the viral spread of misinformation by a small but active anti-vaccination movement.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore the influences of social media on vaccine decision-making in parents.

Design: This study is part of a larger body of research that explored vaccine decision-making in parents. Other methods included were an online survey and semi-structured interviews. This study investigated the influence of cyberculture on parents in an online environment.

Method: This study employed netnography, a form of qualitative inquiry with its roots in ethnography as methodology and a purpose-designed Facebook page as the means of exploring a purpose-designed online community with a particular focus on the culture, belief systems and influences present. Both manual and computer-assisted thematic analyses were used to analyse the data obtained.

Results: Three key themes were identified in this study. These included vaccine safety concerns, the emotional debate and COVID-19-specific issues. The results indicated the presence of strong anti-vaccination sentiment combined with an 'infodemic' of conspiracy theories, misinformation and vitriol with the potential to negatively impact parents seeking immunization information.

Conclusion: Given the popularity and accessibility of social media and the ready access to misinformation present online, it is evident that parental vaccine decision-making may be impacted adversely. Therefore, it is important that healthcare professionals are aware of this and provide adequate and timely education prior to parents seeking information on social media.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy
Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pediatric asthma and COVID-19 vaccination: unveiling patterns of hesitancy and acceptance. Mapping changes in the utilization of childhood immunization over 5 years in a south Indian tertiary care hospital. COVID-19 vaccination in children aged 5-11: a systematic review of parental barriers and facilitators in Western countries. Predictors of Tdap vaccine acceptance in pregnancy before and after delivery. Vaccine skepticism and vaccine development stages; inoculation from "cowpox" lesion to the current mRNA vaccine of COVID-19: review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1