机器人辅助肾部分切除术的围手术期和功能性结果:印度肾部分切除术数据库研究小组的描述性分析。

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Indian Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.4103/iju.iju_443_23
Sudhir Rawal, Arvind Ganpule, Gurpremjit Singh, Nikita Shrivastava, T A Kishore, Deepak Dubey, Ravimohan S Mavuduru, Anant Kumar, Gagan Gautam, Ginil Kumar Pooleri, Mohan Keshavamurthy, Narasimhan Ragavan, Hemang Baxi, Sanjai Kumar Addla, S Krishnappa Raghunath, Akhil Dahiya, Divya Gupta, Gopal Sharma
{"title":"机器人辅助肾部分切除术的围手术期和功能性结果:印度肾部分切除术数据库研究小组的描述性分析。","authors":"Sudhir Rawal, Arvind Ganpule, Gurpremjit Singh, Nikita Shrivastava, T A Kishore, Deepak Dubey, Ravimohan S Mavuduru, Anant Kumar, Gagan Gautam, Ginil Kumar Pooleri, Mohan Keshavamurthy, Narasimhan Ragavan, Hemang Baxi, Sanjai Kumar Addla, S Krishnappa Raghunath, Akhil Dahiya, Divya Gupta, Gopal Sharma","doi":"10.4103/iju.iju_443_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is an unmet need for high-quality data for Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in the Indian population. Indian study group on partial nephrectomy (ISGPN) is a consortium of Indian centers contributing to the partial nephrectomy (PN) database. The current study is a descriptive analysis of perioperative and functional outcomes following RAPN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this study, the retrospective ISGPN database was reviewed, which included patients who underwent RAPN for renal masses at 14 centers across India from September 2010 to September 2022. Demographic, clinical, radiological, perioperative, and functional data were collected and analyzed. Ethics approval was obtained from each of the participating centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 782 patients were included, and 69.7% were male. The median age was 53 years (interquartile range [IQR 44-62]), median operative time was 180 min (IQR 133-240), median estimated blood loss was 100 mL (IQR 50-200), mean warm ischemia time was 22.7 min and positive surgical margin rates were 2.5%. The complication rate was 16.2%, and most of them were of minor grade. Trifecta and pentafecta outcomes were attained in 61.4% and 60% of patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the largest Indian multi-centric study using the Indian Robotic PN Collaborative database to evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted PN, and has proven its safety and efficacy in the management of renal masses.</p>","PeriodicalId":47352,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11078450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative and functional outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Descriptive analysis of Indian study group on partial nephrectomy database.\",\"authors\":\"Sudhir Rawal, Arvind Ganpule, Gurpremjit Singh, Nikita Shrivastava, T A Kishore, Deepak Dubey, Ravimohan S Mavuduru, Anant Kumar, Gagan Gautam, Ginil Kumar Pooleri, Mohan Keshavamurthy, Narasimhan Ragavan, Hemang Baxi, Sanjai Kumar Addla, S Krishnappa Raghunath, Akhil Dahiya, Divya Gupta, Gopal Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/iju.iju_443_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is an unmet need for high-quality data for Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in the Indian population. Indian study group on partial nephrectomy (ISGPN) is a consortium of Indian centers contributing to the partial nephrectomy (PN) database. The current study is a descriptive analysis of perioperative and functional outcomes following RAPN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this study, the retrospective ISGPN database was reviewed, which included patients who underwent RAPN for renal masses at 14 centers across India from September 2010 to September 2022. Demographic, clinical, radiological, perioperative, and functional data were collected and analyzed. Ethics approval was obtained from each of the participating centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 782 patients were included, and 69.7% were male. The median age was 53 years (interquartile range [IQR 44-62]), median operative time was 180 min (IQR 133-240), median estimated blood loss was 100 mL (IQR 50-200), mean warm ischemia time was 22.7 min and positive surgical margin rates were 2.5%. The complication rate was 16.2%, and most of them were of minor grade. Trifecta and pentafecta outcomes were attained in 61.4% and 60% of patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the largest Indian multi-centric study using the Indian Robotic PN Collaborative database to evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted PN, and has proven its safety and efficacy in the management of renal masses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11078450/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_443_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.iju_443_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:印度人口对机器人辅助肾部分切除术(RAPN)高质量数据的需求尚未得到满足。印度肾部分切除术研究小组(ISGPN)是一个印度中心联盟,为肾部分切除术(PN)数据库做出了贡献。本研究是对 RAPN 术后围手术期和功能结果的描述性分析:本研究回顾了 ISGPN 的回顾性数据库,其中包括 2010 年 9 月至 2022 年 9 月期间在印度 14 个中心因肾脏肿块接受 RAPN 手术的患者。研究人员收集并分析了人口统计学、临床、放射学、围手术期和功能数据。每个参与研究的中心都获得了伦理批准:本研究共纳入 782 名患者,其中 69.7% 为男性。中位年龄为 53 岁(四分位距[IQR 44-62]),中位手术时间为 180 分钟(IQR 133-240),中位估计失血量为 100 毫升(IQR 50-200),平均热缺血时间为 22.7 分钟,手术切缘阳性率为 2.5%。并发症发生率为 16.2%,大部分为轻微并发症。分别有 61.4% 和 60% 的患者获得了三全和五全的结果:这是印度最大的多中心研究,使用了印度机器人PN协作数据库来评估机器人辅助PN的效果,证明了其在肾肿块治疗中的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perioperative and functional outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Descriptive analysis of Indian study group on partial nephrectomy database.

Introduction: There is an unmet need for high-quality data for Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in the Indian population. Indian study group on partial nephrectomy (ISGPN) is a consortium of Indian centers contributing to the partial nephrectomy (PN) database. The current study is a descriptive analysis of perioperative and functional outcomes following RAPN.

Methods: For this study, the retrospective ISGPN database was reviewed, which included patients who underwent RAPN for renal masses at 14 centers across India from September 2010 to September 2022. Demographic, clinical, radiological, perioperative, and functional data were collected and analyzed. Ethics approval was obtained from each of the participating centers.

Results: In this study, 782 patients were included, and 69.7% were male. The median age was 53 years (interquartile range [IQR 44-62]), median operative time was 180 min (IQR 133-240), median estimated blood loss was 100 mL (IQR 50-200), mean warm ischemia time was 22.7 min and positive surgical margin rates were 2.5%. The complication rate was 16.2%, and most of them were of minor grade. Trifecta and pentafecta outcomes were attained in 61.4% and 60% of patients, respectively.

Conclusions: This is the largest Indian multi-centric study using the Indian Robotic PN Collaborative database to evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted PN, and has proven its safety and efficacy in the management of renal masses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Urology
Indian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Urology-IJU (ISSN 0970-1591) is official publication of the Urological Society of India. The journal is published Quarterly. Bibliographic listings: The journal is indexed with Abstracts on Hygiene and Communicable Diseases, CAB Abstracts, Caspur, DOAJ, EBSCO Publishing’s Electronic Databases, Excerpta Medica / EMBASE, Expanded Academic ASAP, Genamics JournalSeek, Global Health, Google Scholar, Health & Wellness Research Center, Health Reference Center Academic, Hinari, Index Copernicus, IndMed, OpenJGate, PubMed, Pubmed Central, Scimago Journal Ranking, SCOLOAR, SCOPUS, SIIC databases, SNEMB, Tropical Diseases Bulletin, Ulrich’s International Periodical Directory
期刊最新文献
The prognostic role of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in upper tract urothelial carcinoma Combination therapy for advanced urothelial cancer: LEAP-011 trial Re: Vasudeva P, Kumar V, Yadav S, Prasad V, Kumar N, Kumar S, et al. Urodynamic assessment of detrusor function in the very acute phase of traumatic spinal cord injury: A prospective cohort study. Indian J Urol 2024;40:31-6 The cost-effectiveness of reusable flexible ureteroscopes: An institutional audit Round Up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1