正畸口内扫描仪中的近红外成像技术用于早期牙髓间龋检测。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.03.013
{"title":"正畸口内扫描仪中的近红外成像技术用于早期牙髓间龋检测。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.03.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span><span>Intraoral scanners commonly used in </span>orthodontic offices now offer near-infrared imaging (NIRI) technology, advertised as a screening tool to identify interproximal caries. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of NIRI detection of interproximal carious lesions in a common intraoral scanner (iTero Element 5D; Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) with and without bitewing radiograph complement, compared with a </span>microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) reference standard.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Extracted human posterior teeth<span> (premolars and molars) were selected for early (noncavitated) interproximal carious lesions (n = 39) and sound control surfaces (n = 47). The teeth were scanned via micro-CT for evaluation by 2 blinded evaluators using consensus scoring. The teeth were mounted to simulate anatomic interproximal contacts and underwent a NIRI scan using iTero Element 5D and bitewing radiographs. Two trained, calibrated examiners independently evaluated (1) near-infrared images alone with clinical photograph, (2) bitewing radiograph alone with clinical photograph, and (3) near-infrared images with bitewing radiograph and clinical photograph in combination, after at least a 10-day washout period between each evaluation.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Interrater reliability was highest for NIRI alone (k = 0.533) compared with bitewing radiograph alone (k = 0.176) or in combination (k = 0.256). NIRI alone showed high specificity (0.83-0.96) and moderate sensitivity (0.42-0.63) compared with a micro-CT reference standard. Dentin lesions were significantly more reliably detected than enamel lesions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>After rigorous training and calibration, NIRI can be used with moderate reliability, high specificity, and moderate sensitivity to detect noncavitated interproximal carious lesions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Near-infrared imaging in orthodontic intraoral scanners for early interproximal caries detection\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.03.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span><span>Intraoral scanners commonly used in </span>orthodontic offices now offer near-infrared imaging (NIRI) technology, advertised as a screening tool to identify interproximal caries. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of NIRI detection of interproximal carious lesions in a common intraoral scanner (iTero Element 5D; Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) with and without bitewing radiograph complement, compared with a </span>microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) reference standard.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Extracted human posterior teeth<span> (premolars and molars) were selected for early (noncavitated) interproximal carious lesions (n = 39) and sound control surfaces (n = 47). The teeth were scanned via micro-CT for evaluation by 2 blinded evaluators using consensus scoring. The teeth were mounted to simulate anatomic interproximal contacts and underwent a NIRI scan using iTero Element 5D and bitewing radiographs. Two trained, calibrated examiners independently evaluated (1) near-infrared images alone with clinical photograph, (2) bitewing radiograph alone with clinical photograph, and (3) near-infrared images with bitewing radiograph and clinical photograph in combination, after at least a 10-day washout period between each evaluation.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Interrater reliability was highest for NIRI alone (k = 0.533) compared with bitewing radiograph alone (k = 0.176) or in combination (k = 0.256). NIRI alone showed high specificity (0.83-0.96) and moderate sensitivity (0.42-0.63) compared with a micro-CT reference standard. Dentin lesions were significantly more reliably detected than enamel lesions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>After rigorous training and calibration, NIRI can be used with moderate reliability, high specificity, and moderate sensitivity to detect noncavitated interproximal carious lesions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540624001367\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540624001367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:正畸诊室常用的口内扫描仪现在提供了近红外成像(NIRI)技术,该技术被宣传为一种筛查工具,可用于识别根尖间龋。本研究旨在评估近红外成像技术与微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)参考标准相比,在有和没有咬翼X光片补充的情况下,使用普通口内扫描仪(iTero Element 5D; Align Technology, San Jose, Calif)检测近端龋病的可靠性和有效性:拔出的人类后牙(前臼齿和臼齿)被选作早期(非龋坏)近心面间龋坏(39 个)和健全控制面(47 个)。通过显微 CT 扫描牙齿,由两名盲人评估员采用共识评分法进行评估。安装牙齿以模拟解剖性近侧接触,并使用 iTero Element 5D 和咬翼X光片进行近红外成像扫描。两名训练有素、经过校准的检查员分别独立评估(1)单独的近红外图像和临床照片;(2)单独的咬翼X光片和临床照片;(3)近红外图像、咬翼X光片和临床照片,每次评估之间至少间隔 10 天:单独使用近红外成像(k = 0.533)与单独使用咬翼X光片(k = 0.176)或组合使用近红外成像(k = 0.256)相比,相互之间的可靠性最高。与显微 CT 参考标准相比,单独使用近红外成像的特异性较高(0.83-0.96),灵敏度适中(0.42-0.63)。牙本质病变的检测可靠性明显高于釉质病变:经过严格的培训和校准后,近红外成像可以以中等的可靠性、高特异性和中等灵敏度检测非凹陷性近侧龋病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Near-infrared imaging in orthodontic intraoral scanners for early interproximal caries detection

Introduction

Intraoral scanners commonly used in orthodontic offices now offer near-infrared imaging (NIRI) technology, advertised as a screening tool to identify interproximal caries. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of NIRI detection of interproximal carious lesions in a common intraoral scanner (iTero Element 5D; Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) with and without bitewing radiograph complement, compared with a microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) reference standard.

Methods

Extracted human posterior teeth (premolars and molars) were selected for early (noncavitated) interproximal carious lesions (n = 39) and sound control surfaces (n = 47). The teeth were scanned via micro-CT for evaluation by 2 blinded evaluators using consensus scoring. The teeth were mounted to simulate anatomic interproximal contacts and underwent a NIRI scan using iTero Element 5D and bitewing radiographs. Two trained, calibrated examiners independently evaluated (1) near-infrared images alone with clinical photograph, (2) bitewing radiograph alone with clinical photograph, and (3) near-infrared images with bitewing radiograph and clinical photograph in combination, after at least a 10-day washout period between each evaluation.

Results

Interrater reliability was highest for NIRI alone (k = 0.533) compared with bitewing radiograph alone (k = 0.176) or in combination (k = 0.256). NIRI alone showed high specificity (0.83-0.96) and moderate sensitivity (0.42-0.63) compared with a micro-CT reference standard. Dentin lesions were significantly more reliably detected than enamel lesions.

Conclusions

After rigorous training and calibration, NIRI can be used with moderate reliability, high specificity, and moderate sensitivity to detect noncavitated interproximal carious lesions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
432
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.
期刊最新文献
Mesiodistal tip expression of mandibular anterior teeth in patients with mandibular incisor extraction treated with Invisalign aligners. Directly printed aligner therapy: A 12-month evaluation of application and effectiveness. The periodontal ligament-periosteum sandwich hypothesis: A thought experiment on fenestrations and dehiscences. Comparison of microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on different orthodontic aligners. Evaluating anchorage and torque control in adolescent patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion among 3 appliances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1