对美国肾移植过程中造成性别差异的社会心理因素和性别因素的系统性研究

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Transplantation Reviews Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1016/j.trre.2024.100858
Shelby A. Smout , Emily M. Yang , Dinushika Mohottige , Camilla W. Nonterah
{"title":"对美国肾移植过程中造成性别差异的社会心理因素和性别因素的系统性研究","authors":"Shelby A. Smout ,&nbsp;Emily M. Yang ,&nbsp;Dinushika Mohottige ,&nbsp;Camilla W. Nonterah","doi":"10.1016/j.trre.2024.100858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Persistent findings suggest women and patients identified as “female” are less likely to receive a kidney transplant. Furthermore, the limited research on transplantation among transgender and gender diverse people suggests this population is susceptible to many of the same psychosocial and systemic barriers.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This review sought to 1) highlight terminology used to elucidate gender disparities, 2) identify barriers present along the steps to transplantation, and 3) summarize contributors to gender disparities across the steps to transplantation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review of gender and sex disparities in the steps towards kidney transplantation was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines across four social science and public health databases from 2005 to 23.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search yielded 1696 initial results, 33 of which met inclusion criteria. A majority of studies followed a retrospective cohort design (<em>n</em> = 22, 66.7%), inconsistently used gender and sex related terminology (<em>n</em> = 21, 63.6%), and reported significant findings for gender and sex disparities within the steps towards transplantation (<em>n</em> = 28, 84.8%). Gender disparities among the earlier steps were characterized by patient-provider communication and perception of medical suitability whereas disparities in the later steps were characterized by differential outcomes based on older age, an above average BMI, and Black racial identity. Findings for transgender patients pointed to issues computing eGFR and the need for culturally tailored care.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Providers should be encouraged to critically examine the diagnostic criteria used to determine transplant eligibility and adopt practices that can be culturally tailored to meet the needs of patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48973,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reviews","volume":"38 3","pages":"Article 100858"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of psychosocial and sex-based contributors to gender disparities in the United States across the steps towards kidney transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Shelby A. Smout ,&nbsp;Emily M. Yang ,&nbsp;Dinushika Mohottige ,&nbsp;Camilla W. Nonterah\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trre.2024.100858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Persistent findings suggest women and patients identified as “female” are less likely to receive a kidney transplant. Furthermore, the limited research on transplantation among transgender and gender diverse people suggests this population is susceptible to many of the same psychosocial and systemic barriers.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This review sought to 1) highlight terminology used to elucidate gender disparities, 2) identify barriers present along the steps to transplantation, and 3) summarize contributors to gender disparities across the steps to transplantation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review of gender and sex disparities in the steps towards kidney transplantation was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines across four social science and public health databases from 2005 to 23.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search yielded 1696 initial results, 33 of which met inclusion criteria. A majority of studies followed a retrospective cohort design (<em>n</em> = 22, 66.7%), inconsistently used gender and sex related terminology (<em>n</em> = 21, 63.6%), and reported significant findings for gender and sex disparities within the steps towards transplantation (<em>n</em> = 28, 84.8%). Gender disparities among the earlier steps were characterized by patient-provider communication and perception of medical suitability whereas disparities in the later steps were characterized by differential outcomes based on older age, an above average BMI, and Black racial identity. Findings for transgender patients pointed to issues computing eGFR and the need for culturally tailored care.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Providers should be encouraged to critically examine the diagnostic criteria used to determine transplant eligibility and adopt practices that can be culturally tailored to meet the needs of patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation Reviews\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100858\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X24000417\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X24000417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言 持续的研究结果表明,女性和被认定为 "女性 "的患者接受肾移植的可能性较低。本综述旨在:1)强调用于阐明性别差异的术语;2)识别移植步骤中存在的障碍;3)总结造成移植步骤中性别差异的因素。方法根据PRISMA指南,在2005年至23年间的四个社会科学和公共卫生数据库中对肾移植步骤中的性别和性别差异进行了系统性回顾。大多数研究采用回顾性队列设计(22 项,66.7%),使用的性别相关术语不一致(21 项,63.6%),并报告了移植步骤中性别差异的重大发现(28 项,84.8%)。早期步骤中的性别差异主要体现在患者与医护人员的沟通以及对医疗适宜性的认知上,而后期步骤中的性别差异则体现在基于年龄偏大、体重指数高于平均水平以及黑人种族身份的不同结果上。变性患者的研究结果表明了计算 eGFR 的问题以及文化定制护理的必要性。讨论 应鼓励医疗服务提供者严格审查用于确定移植资格的诊断标准,并采用可根据文化定制的方法来满足患者的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review of psychosocial and sex-based contributors to gender disparities in the United States across the steps towards kidney transplantation

Introduction

Persistent findings suggest women and patients identified as “female” are less likely to receive a kidney transplant. Furthermore, the limited research on transplantation among transgender and gender diverse people suggests this population is susceptible to many of the same psychosocial and systemic barriers.

Objective

This review sought to 1) highlight terminology used to elucidate gender disparities, 2) identify barriers present along the steps to transplantation, and 3) summarize contributors to gender disparities across the steps to transplantation.

Methods

A systematic review of gender and sex disparities in the steps towards kidney transplantation was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines across four social science and public health databases from 2005 to 23.

Results

The search yielded 1696 initial results, 33 of which met inclusion criteria. A majority of studies followed a retrospective cohort design (n = 22, 66.7%), inconsistently used gender and sex related terminology (n = 21, 63.6%), and reported significant findings for gender and sex disparities within the steps towards transplantation (n = 28, 84.8%). Gender disparities among the earlier steps were characterized by patient-provider communication and perception of medical suitability whereas disparities in the later steps were characterized by differential outcomes based on older age, an above average BMI, and Black racial identity. Findings for transgender patients pointed to issues computing eGFR and the need for culturally tailored care.

Discussion

Providers should be encouraged to critically examine the diagnostic criteria used to determine transplant eligibility and adopt practices that can be culturally tailored to meet the needs of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Reviews
Transplantation Reviews IMMUNOLOGY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
40
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Reviews contains state-of-the-art review articles on both clinical and experimental transplantation. The journal features invited articles by authorities in immunology, transplantation medicine and surgery.
期刊最新文献
Complement and complement regulatory protein in allogeneic and xenogeneic kidney transplantation Frailty serves as an adverse predictor for mortality in liver transplant candidates: A systematic review and meta-analysis Outcomes of kidney replacement therapies after kidney transplant failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in solid organ transplant recipients: Current therapeutic and screening strategies Factors and interventions affecting tacrolimus intrapatient variability: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1