雨水截留池的优化控制策略

IF 3.7 2区 计算机科学 Q2 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS Nonlinear Analysis-Hybrid Systems Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1016/j.nahs.2024.101504
Martijn A. Goorden , Kim G. Larsen , Jesper E. Nielsen , Thomas D. Nielsen , Weizhu Qian , Michael R. Rasmussen , Jiří Srba , Guohan Zhao
{"title":"雨水截留池的优化控制策略","authors":"Martijn A. Goorden ,&nbsp;Kim G. Larsen ,&nbsp;Jesper E. Nielsen ,&nbsp;Thomas D. Nielsen ,&nbsp;Weizhu Qian ,&nbsp;Michael R. Rasmussen ,&nbsp;Jiří Srba ,&nbsp;Guohan Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.nahs.2024.101504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Stormwater detention ponds are essential stormwater management solutions that regulate the urban catchment discharge towards streams. Their purposes are to reduce the hydraulic load to avoid stream erosion, as well as to minimize the degradation of the natural waterbody by direct discharge of pollutants. Currently, static controllers are widely implemented for detention pond outflow regulation in engineering practice, i.e., the outflow discharge is capped at a fixed value. Such a passive discharge setting fails to exploit the full potential of the overall water system, hence further improvements are needed. We apply formal methods to synthesize (i.e., derive automatically) optimal active controllers. We model the stormwater detention pond, including the urban catchment area and the rain forecasts with its uncertainty, as hybrid Markov decision processes. Subsequently, we use the tool <span>Uppaal</span> <span>Stratego</span> to synthesize using Q-learning a control strategy maximizing the retention time for pollutant sedimentation (optimality) while also minimizing the duration of emergency overflow in the detention pond (safety). These strategies are synthesized for both an off-line and on-line settings. Simulation results for an existing pond show that <span>Uppaal</span> <span>Stratego</span> can learn optimal strategies that significantly reduce emergency overflows. For off-line controllers, a scenario with low rain periods shows a 26% improvement of pollutant sedimentation with respect to static control, and a scenario with high rain periods shows a reduction of overflow probability of 10%–19% for static control to lower than 5%, while pollutant sedimentation has only declined by 7% compared to static-control. For on-line controllers, one scenario with heavy rain shows a 95% overflow duration reduction and a 29% pollutant sedimentation improvement compared to static control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49011,"journal":{"name":"Nonlinear Analysis-Hybrid Systems","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 101504"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751570X24000414/pdfft?md5=200e71aa2ed9483ffd9ff6f45ee3a527&pid=1-s2.0-S1751570X24000414-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal control strategies for stormwater detention ponds\",\"authors\":\"Martijn A. Goorden ,&nbsp;Kim G. Larsen ,&nbsp;Jesper E. Nielsen ,&nbsp;Thomas D. Nielsen ,&nbsp;Weizhu Qian ,&nbsp;Michael R. Rasmussen ,&nbsp;Jiří Srba ,&nbsp;Guohan Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nahs.2024.101504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Stormwater detention ponds are essential stormwater management solutions that regulate the urban catchment discharge towards streams. Their purposes are to reduce the hydraulic load to avoid stream erosion, as well as to minimize the degradation of the natural waterbody by direct discharge of pollutants. Currently, static controllers are widely implemented for detention pond outflow regulation in engineering practice, i.e., the outflow discharge is capped at a fixed value. Such a passive discharge setting fails to exploit the full potential of the overall water system, hence further improvements are needed. We apply formal methods to synthesize (i.e., derive automatically) optimal active controllers. We model the stormwater detention pond, including the urban catchment area and the rain forecasts with its uncertainty, as hybrid Markov decision processes. Subsequently, we use the tool <span>Uppaal</span> <span>Stratego</span> to synthesize using Q-learning a control strategy maximizing the retention time for pollutant sedimentation (optimality) while also minimizing the duration of emergency overflow in the detention pond (safety). These strategies are synthesized for both an off-line and on-line settings. Simulation results for an existing pond show that <span>Uppaal</span> <span>Stratego</span> can learn optimal strategies that significantly reduce emergency overflows. For off-line controllers, a scenario with low rain periods shows a 26% improvement of pollutant sedimentation with respect to static control, and a scenario with high rain periods shows a reduction of overflow probability of 10%–19% for static control to lower than 5%, while pollutant sedimentation has only declined by 7% compared to static-control. For on-line controllers, one scenario with heavy rain shows a 95% overflow duration reduction and a 29% pollutant sedimentation improvement compared to static control.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nonlinear Analysis-Hybrid Systems\",\"volume\":\"53 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751570X24000414/pdfft?md5=200e71aa2ed9483ffd9ff6f45ee3a527&pid=1-s2.0-S1751570X24000414-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nonlinear Analysis-Hybrid Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751570X24000414\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonlinear Analysis-Hybrid Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751570X24000414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

雨水滞留池是重要的雨水管理解决方案,可调节城市集水区向溪流的排放。其目的是减少水力负荷,避免溪流侵蚀,以及尽量减少污染物直接排放对自然水体造成的恶化。目前,工程实践中广泛采用静态控制器来调节滞留池的流出量,即把流出量限制在一个固定值上。这种被动的排放设置无法充分发挥整个水系统的潜力,因此需要进一步改进。我们采用正规方法合成(即自动推导)最佳主动控制器。我们将雨水滞留池(包括城市集水区和不确定的雨量预测)建模为混合马尔可夫决策过程。随后,我们使用 Uppaal Stratego 工具,通过 Q-learning 综合出一种控制策略,既能最大限度地延长污染物沉积的滞留时间(最优性),又能最大限度地缩短滞留池紧急溢流的持续时间(安全性)。这些策略是在离线和在线设置下合成的。对一个现有池塘的模拟结果表明,Uppaal Stratego 可以学习到显著减少紧急溢流的最优策略。对于离线控制器,在雨量较少的情况下,污染物沉积量比静态控制提高了 26%;在雨量较大的情况下,溢流概率从静态控制的 10%-19%降至 5%以下,而污染物沉积量与静态控制相比仅下降了 7%。就在线控制器而言,与静态控制相比,暴雨情况下的溢流持续时间缩短了 95%,污染物沉积量减少了 29%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimal control strategies for stormwater detention ponds

Stormwater detention ponds are essential stormwater management solutions that regulate the urban catchment discharge towards streams. Their purposes are to reduce the hydraulic load to avoid stream erosion, as well as to minimize the degradation of the natural waterbody by direct discharge of pollutants. Currently, static controllers are widely implemented for detention pond outflow regulation in engineering practice, i.e., the outflow discharge is capped at a fixed value. Such a passive discharge setting fails to exploit the full potential of the overall water system, hence further improvements are needed. We apply formal methods to synthesize (i.e., derive automatically) optimal active controllers. We model the stormwater detention pond, including the urban catchment area and the rain forecasts with its uncertainty, as hybrid Markov decision processes. Subsequently, we use the tool Uppaal Stratego to synthesize using Q-learning a control strategy maximizing the retention time for pollutant sedimentation (optimality) while also minimizing the duration of emergency overflow in the detention pond (safety). These strategies are synthesized for both an off-line and on-line settings. Simulation results for an existing pond show that Uppaal Stratego can learn optimal strategies that significantly reduce emergency overflows. For off-line controllers, a scenario with low rain periods shows a 26% improvement of pollutant sedimentation with respect to static control, and a scenario with high rain periods shows a reduction of overflow probability of 10%–19% for static control to lower than 5%, while pollutant sedimentation has only declined by 7% compared to static-control. For on-line controllers, one scenario with heavy rain shows a 95% overflow duration reduction and a 29% pollutant sedimentation improvement compared to static control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nonlinear Analysis-Hybrid Systems
Nonlinear Analysis-Hybrid Systems AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS-MATHEMATICS, APPLIED
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems welcomes all important research and expository papers in any discipline. Papers that are principally concerned with the theory of hybrid systems should contain significant results indicating relevant applications. Papers that emphasize applications should consist of important real world models and illuminating techniques. Papers that interrelate various aspects of hybrid systems will be most welcome.
期刊最新文献
Adaptive hybrid global attitude tracking controller Efficient strategy synthesis for switched stochastic systems with distributional uncertainty Sustainable solution for hybrid differential game with regime shifts and random duration Asymptotic synchronization in coupled Boolean and probabilistic Boolean networks with delays Asynchronous intermittent sampled-data control for delayed complex dynamical networks with Lévy noise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1