Martijn A. Goorden , Kim G. Larsen , Jesper E. Nielsen , Thomas D. Nielsen , Weizhu Qian , Michael R. Rasmussen , Jiří Srba , Guohan Zhao
{"title":"雨水截留池的优化控制策略","authors":"Martijn A. Goorden , Kim G. Larsen , Jesper E. Nielsen , Thomas D. Nielsen , Weizhu Qian , Michael R. Rasmussen , Jiří Srba , Guohan Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.nahs.2024.101504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Stormwater detention ponds are essential stormwater management solutions that regulate the urban catchment discharge towards streams. Their purposes are to reduce the hydraulic load to avoid stream erosion, as well as to minimize the degradation of the natural waterbody by direct discharge of pollutants. Currently, static controllers are widely implemented for detention pond outflow regulation in engineering practice, i.e., the outflow discharge is capped at a fixed value. Such a passive discharge setting fails to exploit the full potential of the overall water system, hence further improvements are needed. We apply formal methods to synthesize (i.e., derive automatically) optimal active controllers. We model the stormwater detention pond, including the urban catchment area and the rain forecasts with its uncertainty, as hybrid Markov decision processes. Subsequently, we use the tool <span>Uppaal</span> <span>Stratego</span> to synthesize using Q-learning a control strategy maximizing the retention time for pollutant sedimentation (optimality) while also minimizing the duration of emergency overflow in the detention pond (safety). These strategies are synthesized for both an off-line and on-line settings. Simulation results for an existing pond show that <span>Uppaal</span> <span>Stratego</span> can learn optimal strategies that significantly reduce emergency overflows. For off-line controllers, a scenario with low rain periods shows a 26% improvement of pollutant sedimentation with respect to static control, and a scenario with high rain periods shows a reduction of overflow probability of 10%–19% for static control to lower than 5%, while pollutant sedimentation has only declined by 7% compared to static-control. For on-line controllers, one scenario with heavy rain shows a 95% overflow duration reduction and a 29% pollutant sedimentation improvement compared to static control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49011,"journal":{"name":"Nonlinear Analysis-Hybrid Systems","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 101504"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751570X24000414/pdfft?md5=200e71aa2ed9483ffd9ff6f45ee3a527&pid=1-s2.0-S1751570X24000414-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal control strategies for stormwater detention ponds\",\"authors\":\"Martijn A. Goorden , Kim G. Larsen , Jesper E. Nielsen , Thomas D. Nielsen , Weizhu Qian , Michael R. Rasmussen , Jiří Srba , Guohan Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nahs.2024.101504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Stormwater detention ponds are essential stormwater management solutions that regulate the urban catchment discharge towards streams. Their purposes are to reduce the hydraulic load to avoid stream erosion, as well as to minimize the degradation of the natural waterbody by direct discharge of pollutants. Currently, static controllers are widely implemented for detention pond outflow regulation in engineering practice, i.e., the outflow discharge is capped at a fixed value. Such a passive discharge setting fails to exploit the full potential of the overall water system, hence further improvements are needed. We apply formal methods to synthesize (i.e., derive automatically) optimal active controllers. We model the stormwater detention pond, including the urban catchment area and the rain forecasts with its uncertainty, as hybrid Markov decision processes. Subsequently, we use the tool <span>Uppaal</span> <span>Stratego</span> to synthesize using Q-learning a control strategy maximizing the retention time for pollutant sedimentation (optimality) while also minimizing the duration of emergency overflow in the detention pond (safety). These strategies are synthesized for both an off-line and on-line settings. Simulation results for an existing pond show that <span>Uppaal</span> <span>Stratego</span> can learn optimal strategies that significantly reduce emergency overflows. For off-line controllers, a scenario with low rain periods shows a 26% improvement of pollutant sedimentation with respect to static control, and a scenario with high rain periods shows a reduction of overflow probability of 10%–19% for static control to lower than 5%, while pollutant sedimentation has only declined by 7% compared to static-control. For on-line controllers, one scenario with heavy rain shows a 95% overflow duration reduction and a 29% pollutant sedimentation improvement compared to static control.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nonlinear Analysis-Hybrid Systems\",\"volume\":\"53 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751570X24000414/pdfft?md5=200e71aa2ed9483ffd9ff6f45ee3a527&pid=1-s2.0-S1751570X24000414-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nonlinear Analysis-Hybrid Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751570X24000414\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonlinear Analysis-Hybrid Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751570X24000414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimal control strategies for stormwater detention ponds
Stormwater detention ponds are essential stormwater management solutions that regulate the urban catchment discharge towards streams. Their purposes are to reduce the hydraulic load to avoid stream erosion, as well as to minimize the degradation of the natural waterbody by direct discharge of pollutants. Currently, static controllers are widely implemented for detention pond outflow regulation in engineering practice, i.e., the outflow discharge is capped at a fixed value. Such a passive discharge setting fails to exploit the full potential of the overall water system, hence further improvements are needed. We apply formal methods to synthesize (i.e., derive automatically) optimal active controllers. We model the stormwater detention pond, including the urban catchment area and the rain forecasts with its uncertainty, as hybrid Markov decision processes. Subsequently, we use the tool UppaalStratego to synthesize using Q-learning a control strategy maximizing the retention time for pollutant sedimentation (optimality) while also minimizing the duration of emergency overflow in the detention pond (safety). These strategies are synthesized for both an off-line and on-line settings. Simulation results for an existing pond show that UppaalStratego can learn optimal strategies that significantly reduce emergency overflows. For off-line controllers, a scenario with low rain periods shows a 26% improvement of pollutant sedimentation with respect to static control, and a scenario with high rain periods shows a reduction of overflow probability of 10%–19% for static control to lower than 5%, while pollutant sedimentation has only declined by 7% compared to static-control. For on-line controllers, one scenario with heavy rain shows a 95% overflow duration reduction and a 29% pollutant sedimentation improvement compared to static control.
期刊介绍:
Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems welcomes all important research and expository papers in any discipline. Papers that are principally concerned with the theory of hybrid systems should contain significant results indicating relevant applications. Papers that emphasize applications should consist of important real world models and illuminating techniques. Papers that interrelate various aspects of hybrid systems will be most welcome.