Marie Linder, Anders Ekbom, Gunnar Brobert, Kai Vogtländer, Yanina Balabanova, Cecilia Becattini, Marc Carrier, Alexander T Cohen, Craig I Coleman, Alok A Khorana, Agnes Y Y Lee, George Psaroudakis, Khaled Abdelgawwad, Marcela Rivera, Bernhard Schaefer, Diego Hernan Giunta
{"title":"利伐沙班和低分子量肝素治疗癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞症的比较:一项基于瑞典全国人口登记的研究。","authors":"Marie Linder, Anders Ekbom, Gunnar Brobert, Kai Vogtländer, Yanina Balabanova, Cecilia Becattini, Marc Carrier, Alexander T Cohen, Craig I Coleman, Alok A Khorana, Agnes Y Y Lee, George Psaroudakis, Khaled Abdelgawwad, Marcela Rivera, Bernhard Schaefer, Diego Hernan Giunta","doi":"10.1007/s11239-024-02992-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treating cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) with anticoagulation prevents recurrent venous thromboembolism (rVTE), but increases bleeding risk.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare incidence of rVTE, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality for rivaroxaban versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with CAT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a cohort study using Swedish national registers 2013-2019. Patients with CAT (venous thromboembolism within 6 months of cancer diagnosis) were included. Those with other indications or with high bleeding risk cancers were excluded (according to guidelines). Follow-up was from index-CAT until outcome, death, emigration, or end of study. Incidence rates (IR) per 1000 person-years with 95% confidence interval (CI) and propensity score overlap-weighted hazard ratios (HRs) for rivaroxaban versus LMWH were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 283 patients on rivaroxaban and 5181 on LMWH. The IR for rVTE was 68.7 (95% CI 40.0-109.9) for rivaroxaban, compared with 91.6 (95% CI 81.9-102.0) for LMWH, with adjusted HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.43-1.35). The IR for major bleeding was 23.5 (95% CI 8.6-51.1) for rivaroxaban versus 49.2 (95% CI 42.3-56.9) for LMWH, with adjusted HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.26-1.49). The IR for all-cause mortality was 146.8 (95% CI 103.9-201.5) for rivaroxaban and 565.6 (95% CI 541.8-590.2) for LMWH with adjusted HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.34-0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rivaroxaban performed similarly to LMWH for patients with CAT for rVTE and major bleeding. An all-cause mortality benefit was observed for rivaroxaban which potentially may be attributed to residual confounding.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05150938 (Registered 9 December 2021).</p>","PeriodicalId":17546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","volume":" ","pages":"973-983"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of rivaroxaban and low molecular weight heparin in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a Swedish national population-based register study.\",\"authors\":\"Marie Linder, Anders Ekbom, Gunnar Brobert, Kai Vogtländer, Yanina Balabanova, Cecilia Becattini, Marc Carrier, Alexander T Cohen, Craig I Coleman, Alok A Khorana, Agnes Y Y Lee, George Psaroudakis, Khaled Abdelgawwad, Marcela Rivera, Bernhard Schaefer, Diego Hernan Giunta\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11239-024-02992-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treating cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) with anticoagulation prevents recurrent venous thromboembolism (rVTE), but increases bleeding risk.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare incidence of rVTE, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality for rivaroxaban versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with CAT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a cohort study using Swedish national registers 2013-2019. Patients with CAT (venous thromboembolism within 6 months of cancer diagnosis) were included. Those with other indications or with high bleeding risk cancers were excluded (according to guidelines). Follow-up was from index-CAT until outcome, death, emigration, or end of study. Incidence rates (IR) per 1000 person-years with 95% confidence interval (CI) and propensity score overlap-weighted hazard ratios (HRs) for rivaroxaban versus LMWH were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 283 patients on rivaroxaban and 5181 on LMWH. The IR for rVTE was 68.7 (95% CI 40.0-109.9) for rivaroxaban, compared with 91.6 (95% CI 81.9-102.0) for LMWH, with adjusted HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.43-1.35). The IR for major bleeding was 23.5 (95% CI 8.6-51.1) for rivaroxaban versus 49.2 (95% CI 42.3-56.9) for LMWH, with adjusted HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.26-1.49). The IR for all-cause mortality was 146.8 (95% CI 103.9-201.5) for rivaroxaban and 565.6 (95% CI 541.8-590.2) for LMWH with adjusted HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.34-0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rivaroxaban performed similarly to LMWH for patients with CAT for rVTE and major bleeding. An all-cause mortality benefit was observed for rivaroxaban which potentially may be attributed to residual confounding.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05150938 (Registered 9 December 2021).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"973-983\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315776/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-024-02992-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-024-02992-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:抗凝治疗癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞症(CAT)可预防复发性静脉血栓栓塞症(rVTE),但会增加出血风险:比较利伐沙班与低分子量肝素(LMWH)在CAT患者中的rVTE、大出血和全因死亡率:我们利用瑞典 2013-2019 年国家登记册开展了一项队列研究。研究纳入了CAT(癌症诊断后6个月内发生静脉血栓栓塞)患者。有其他适应症或有高出血风险的癌症患者被排除在外(根据指南)。随访时间从指数-CAT 开始,直至结果、死亡、移民或研究结束。估算了利伐沙班与 LMWH 的每千人年发病率(IR)及 95% 置信区间(CI)和倾向评分重叠加权危险比(HR):我们纳入了283名使用利伐沙班的患者和5181名使用LMWH的患者。利伐沙班的 rVTE IR 为 68.7(95% CI 40.0-109.9),而 LMWH 为 91.6(95% CI 81.9-102.0),调整后 HR 为 0.77(95% CI 0.43-1.35)。利伐沙班的大出血IR为23.5(95% CI 8.6-51.1),而LMWH为49.2(95% CI 42.3-56.9),调整后HR为0.62(95% CI 0.26-1.49)。利伐沙班的全因死亡率IR为146.8(95% CI 103.9-201.5),LMWH为565.6(95% CI 541.8-590.2),调整后HR为0.48(95% CI 0.34-0.67):对于患有CAT的rVTE和大出血患者,利伐沙班的治疗效果与LMWH相似。结论:利伐沙班对CAT患者的rVTE和大出血治疗效果类似于LMWH,但利伐沙班有全因死亡率获益,这可能是由于残余混杂因素所致:NCT05150938(2021年12月9日注册)。
Comparison of rivaroxaban and low molecular weight heparin in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a Swedish national population-based register study.
Background: Treating cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) with anticoagulation prevents recurrent venous thromboembolism (rVTE), but increases bleeding risk.
Objectives: To compare incidence of rVTE, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality for rivaroxaban versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with CAT.
Methods: We developed a cohort study using Swedish national registers 2013-2019. Patients with CAT (venous thromboembolism within 6 months of cancer diagnosis) were included. Those with other indications or with high bleeding risk cancers were excluded (according to guidelines). Follow-up was from index-CAT until outcome, death, emigration, or end of study. Incidence rates (IR) per 1000 person-years with 95% confidence interval (CI) and propensity score overlap-weighted hazard ratios (HRs) for rivaroxaban versus LMWH were estimated.
Results: We included 283 patients on rivaroxaban and 5181 on LMWH. The IR for rVTE was 68.7 (95% CI 40.0-109.9) for rivaroxaban, compared with 91.6 (95% CI 81.9-102.0) for LMWH, with adjusted HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.43-1.35). The IR for major bleeding was 23.5 (95% CI 8.6-51.1) for rivaroxaban versus 49.2 (95% CI 42.3-56.9) for LMWH, with adjusted HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.26-1.49). The IR for all-cause mortality was 146.8 (95% CI 103.9-201.5) for rivaroxaban and 565.6 (95% CI 541.8-590.2) for LMWH with adjusted HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.34-0.67).
Conclusions: Rivaroxaban performed similarly to LMWH for patients with CAT for rVTE and major bleeding. An all-cause mortality benefit was observed for rivaroxaban which potentially may be attributed to residual confounding.
Trial registration number: NCT05150938 (Registered 9 December 2021).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis is a long-awaited resource for contemporary cardiologists, hematologists, vascular medicine specialists and clinician-scientists actively involved in treatment decisions and clinical investigation of thrombotic disorders involving the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. The principal focus of the Journal centers on the pathobiology of thrombosis and vascular disorders and the use of anticoagulants, platelet antagonists, cell-based therapies and interventions in scientific investigation, clinical-translational research and patient care.
The Journal will publish original work which emphasizes the interface between fundamental scientific principles and clinical investigation, stimulating an interdisciplinary and scholarly dialogue in thrombosis and vascular science. Published works will also define platforms for translational research, drug development, clinical trials and patient-directed applications. The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis'' integrated format will expand the reader''s knowledge base and provide important insights for both the investigation and direct clinical application of the most rapidly growing fields in medicine-thrombosis and vascular science.