塞库单抗治疗成人扁平苔藓患者:随机、安慰剂对照、概念验证 PRELUDE 研究的疗效和安全性结果。

IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY British Journal of Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1093/bjd/ljae181
Thierry Passeron, Maximilian Reinhardt, Benjamin Ehst, Jonathan Weiss, Jason Sluzevich, Michael Sticherling, Pascal Reygagne, Johannes Wohlrab, Michael Hertl, Nasim Fazel, Elisa Muscianisi, Heng Fan, Isabelle Hampele, Nicolò Compagno
{"title":"塞库单抗治疗成人扁平苔藓患者:随机、安慰剂对照、概念验证 PRELUDE 研究的疗效和安全性结果。","authors":"Thierry Passeron, Maximilian Reinhardt, Benjamin Ehst, Jonathan Weiss, Jason Sluzevich, Michael Sticherling, Pascal Reygagne, Johannes Wohlrab, Michael Hertl, Nasim Fazel, Elisa Muscianisi, Heng Fan, Isabelle Hampele, Nicolò Compagno","doi":"10.1093/bjd/ljae181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with lichen planus (LP) refractory to available therapies often experience a high disease burden, representing a population with a clear unmet need for new treatments.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab 300 mg over 32 weeks in adult patients with biopsy-proven cutaneous LP (CLP), mucosal LP (MLP) or lichen planopilaris (LPP) that is inadequately controlled by topical corticosteroids.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PRELUDE was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase II proof-of-concept study that enrolled patients with CLP, MLP or LPP. Eligible patients were randomized to either secukinumab 300 mg every 4 weeks for 32 weeks (SECQ4W) or placebo for 16 weeks followed by secukinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (SECQ2W) for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was achievement of the newly designed Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score ≤ 2 at week 16.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 111 patients were randomized (n = 37 each) to CLP, MLP and LPP cohorts. As the proof-of-concept criteria were not met for any of the three cohorts, the primary objective was not met. A numerically higher proportion of patients achieved IGA ≤ 2 response at week 16 with SECQ4W vs. placebo in the MLP {37.5% [95% credibility interval (Crl) 20.3-57.2] vs. 23.1% (95% Crl 6.5-49.2)} and LPP cohorts [37.5% (95% Crl 20.2-57.3) vs. 30.8% (95% Crl 10.8-57.6)]. In the LPP cohort, a sustained response for IGA ≤ 2 from week 16 to week 32 was achieved with SECQ4W (week 16, 37.5%; week 32, 45.8%), and a substantial improvement was observed in IGA ≤ 2 response in patients from this cohort who switched from placebo (week 16, 30.8%) to SECQ2W after week 16 (week 32, 63.6%). The safety profile was consistent with the known profile of secukinumab and showed no new or unexpected signals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRELUDE is the first randomized controlled basket trial evaluating interleukin (IL)-17A inhibition with secukinumab across three subtypes of LP. Secukinumab was well tolerated and safe, showing different response rates across the three subtypes, with numerical IGA improvements in MLP and LPP, and no response in CLP. The study raises the question of a differential role of IL-17A across LP subtypes. The novel IGA score showed significant correlation with both patient- and physician-reported outcome measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":9238,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"680-690"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secukinumab in adult patients with lichen planus: efficacy and safety results from the randomized placebo-controlled proof-of-concept PRELUDE study.\",\"authors\":\"Thierry Passeron, Maximilian Reinhardt, Benjamin Ehst, Jonathan Weiss, Jason Sluzevich, Michael Sticherling, Pascal Reygagne, Johannes Wohlrab, Michael Hertl, Nasim Fazel, Elisa Muscianisi, Heng Fan, Isabelle Hampele, Nicolò Compagno\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjd/ljae181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with lichen planus (LP) refractory to available therapies often experience a high disease burden, representing a population with a clear unmet need for new treatments.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab 300 mg over 32 weeks in adult patients with biopsy-proven cutaneous LP (CLP), mucosal LP (MLP) or lichen planopilaris (LPP) that is inadequately controlled by topical corticosteroids.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PRELUDE was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase II proof-of-concept study that enrolled patients with CLP, MLP or LPP. Eligible patients were randomized to either secukinumab 300 mg every 4 weeks for 32 weeks (SECQ4W) or placebo for 16 weeks followed by secukinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (SECQ2W) for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was achievement of the newly designed Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score ≤ 2 at week 16.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 111 patients were randomized (n = 37 each) to CLP, MLP and LPP cohorts. As the proof-of-concept criteria were not met for any of the three cohorts, the primary objective was not met. A numerically higher proportion of patients achieved IGA ≤ 2 response at week 16 with SECQ4W vs. placebo in the MLP {37.5% [95% credibility interval (Crl) 20.3-57.2] vs. 23.1% (95% Crl 6.5-49.2)} and LPP cohorts [37.5% (95% Crl 20.2-57.3) vs. 30.8% (95% Crl 10.8-57.6)]. In the LPP cohort, a sustained response for IGA ≤ 2 from week 16 to week 32 was achieved with SECQ4W (week 16, 37.5%; week 32, 45.8%), and a substantial improvement was observed in IGA ≤ 2 response in patients from this cohort who switched from placebo (week 16, 30.8%) to SECQ2W after week 16 (week 32, 63.6%). The safety profile was consistent with the known profile of secukinumab and showed no new or unexpected signals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRELUDE is the first randomized controlled basket trial evaluating interleukin (IL)-17A inhibition with secukinumab across three subtypes of LP. Secukinumab was well tolerated and safe, showing different response rates across the three subtypes, with numerical IGA improvements in MLP and LPP, and no response in CLP. The study raises the question of a differential role of IL-17A across LP subtypes. The novel IGA score showed significant correlation with both patient- and physician-reported outcome measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Dermatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"680-690\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae181\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae181","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对现有疗法难治的扁平苔藓(LP)患者往往承受着沉重的疾病负担;这类患者对新疗法的需求显然尚未得到满足:目的:评估secukinumab 300毫克、持续32周对经活检证实患有皮肤扁平苔藓(CLP)、粘膜扁平苔藓(MLP)或扁平苔藓(LPP)、外用皮质类固醇激素控制不佳的成年患者的疗效和安全性:PRELUDE是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的2期概念验证研究,招募了CLP、MLP或LPP患者。符合条件的患者被随机分配到secukinumab 300 mg,每4周一次,共32周(SECQ4W),或安慰剂16周,然后secukinumab 300 mg,每2周一次(SECQ2W),共16周。主要终点是在第16周时达到新设计的研究者总体评估(IGA)评分≤2分:共有 111 名患者被随机分配到 CLP、MLP 和 LPP 组别(各 37 人)。由于三个组别均未达到概念验证标准,因此未达到主要目标。在MLP队列(37.5% [95% 可信区间(Crl):20.3-57.2] vs. 23.1% [95% Crl:6.5-49.2])和LPP队列(37.5% [95% Crl:20.2-57.3] vs. 30.8% [95% Crl:10.8-57.6])中,SECQ4W与安慰剂相比,在第16周达到IGA≤2反应的患者比例更高。在LPP队列中,SECQ4W在第16周至第32周期间实现了IGA≤2的持续应答(第16周:37.5%;第32周:45.8%),在第16周后从安慰剂(第16周:30.8%)转为SECQ2W的该队列患者中观察到IGA≤2应答的大幅改善(第32周:63.6%)。安全性与secukinumab的已知特性一致,没有出现新的或意想不到的信号:PRELUDE是首个评估secukinumab对3种亚型LP的白细胞介素-17A抑制作用的随机对照篮子试验。赛库单抗耐受性良好且安全,在3种亚型中显示出不同的反应率,MLP和LPP的IGA数值有所改善,而CLP则无反应。该研究提出了白细胞介素-17A在不同LP亚型中的不同作用的问题。新的IGA评分与患者和医生报告的结果测量结果显示出明显的相关性:NCT04300296.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Secukinumab in adult patients with lichen planus: efficacy and safety results from the randomized placebo-controlled proof-of-concept PRELUDE study.

Background: Patients with lichen planus (LP) refractory to available therapies often experience a high disease burden, representing a population with a clear unmet need for new treatments.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab 300 mg over 32 weeks in adult patients with biopsy-proven cutaneous LP (CLP), mucosal LP (MLP) or lichen planopilaris (LPP) that is inadequately controlled by topical corticosteroids.

Methods: PRELUDE was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase II proof-of-concept study that enrolled patients with CLP, MLP or LPP. Eligible patients were randomized to either secukinumab 300 mg every 4 weeks for 32 weeks (SECQ4W) or placebo for 16 weeks followed by secukinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (SECQ2W) for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was achievement of the newly designed Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score ≤ 2 at week 16.

Results: Overall, 111 patients were randomized (n = 37 each) to CLP, MLP and LPP cohorts. As the proof-of-concept criteria were not met for any of the three cohorts, the primary objective was not met. A numerically higher proportion of patients achieved IGA ≤ 2 response at week 16 with SECQ4W vs. placebo in the MLP {37.5% [95% credibility interval (Crl) 20.3-57.2] vs. 23.1% (95% Crl 6.5-49.2)} and LPP cohorts [37.5% (95% Crl 20.2-57.3) vs. 30.8% (95% Crl 10.8-57.6)]. In the LPP cohort, a sustained response for IGA ≤ 2 from week 16 to week 32 was achieved with SECQ4W (week 16, 37.5%; week 32, 45.8%), and a substantial improvement was observed in IGA ≤ 2 response in patients from this cohort who switched from placebo (week 16, 30.8%) to SECQ2W after week 16 (week 32, 63.6%). The safety profile was consistent with the known profile of secukinumab and showed no new or unexpected signals.

Conclusions: PRELUDE is the first randomized controlled basket trial evaluating interleukin (IL)-17A inhibition with secukinumab across three subtypes of LP. Secukinumab was well tolerated and safe, showing different response rates across the three subtypes, with numerical IGA improvements in MLP and LPP, and no response in CLP. The study raises the question of a differential role of IL-17A across LP subtypes. The novel IGA score showed significant correlation with both patient- and physician-reported outcome measurements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Dermatology
British Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Dermatology (BJD) is committed to publishing the highest quality dermatological research. Through its publications, the journal seeks to advance the understanding, management, and treatment of skin diseases, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Drug Survival and Safety of Biosimilars Compared with Originator Adalimumab for Psoriasis: A Multinational Cohort Study. R(+) Propranolol decreases lipid accumulation in haemangioma-derived stem cells. Tailored Bioengineering and Nanomedicine Strategies for Sex-Specific Healing of Chronic Wounds. Personalized sun protection equation: Dermatology + Psychology = XPAND. Cytokeratin 17 expression is commonly observed in keratinocytic skin tumours and controls tissue homeostasis impacting human papillomavirus protein expression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1