2021 年美国创伤中心急诊科儿科准备情况:创伤中心设施的特点和改进机会。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000004387
Caroline G Melhado, Katherine Remick, Amy Miskovic, Bhavin Patel, Hilary A Hewes, Craig D Newgard, Avery B Nathens, Charles Macias, Lisa Gray, Brian K Yorkgitis, Michael W Dingeldein, Aaron R Jensen
{"title":"2021 年美国创伤中心急诊科儿科准备情况:创伤中心设施的特点和改进机会。","authors":"Caroline G Melhado, Katherine Remick, Amy Miskovic, Bhavin Patel, Hilary A Hewes, Craig D Newgard, Avery B Nathens, Charles Macias, Lisa Gray, Brian K Yorkgitis, Michael W Dingeldein, Aaron R Jensen","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency department (ED) pediatric readiness has been associated with lower mortality for injured children but has historically been suboptimal in nonpediatric trauma centers. Over the past decade, the National Pediatric Readiness Project (NPRP) has invested resources in improving ED pediatric readiness. This study aimed to quantify current trauma center pediatric readiness and identify associations with center-level characteristics to target further efforts to guide improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study cohort included all centers that responded to the 2021 NPRP national assessment and contributed data to the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) the same calendar year. Center characteristics and pediatric (0-15 years) volume from the NTDB were linked to weighted pediatric readiness scores (wPRSs) obtained from the NPRP assessment. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to determine associations between wPRS and trauma center type as well as center-level facility characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The wPRS was reported for 77% (749 of 973) of centers that contributed to the NTDB. Emergency department pediatric readiness was highest in American College of Surgeons level 1 pediatric trauma centers, but wPRS in the highest quartile was seen among all adult and pediatric trauma center types. Independent predictors of high wPRS included American College of Surgeons level 1 pediatric trauma center verification, pediatric trauma volume, and the presence of a pediatric intensive care unit. Higher-level adult trauma centers and pediatric trauma centers were more likely to have pediatric-specific physician requirements, pediatric emergency care coordinators, and pediatric quality improvement initiatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Emergency department pediatric readiness in trauma centers remains variable and is predictably lower in centers that lack inpatient resources. There is, however, no aspect of ED pediatric readiness that is constrained to high-level pediatric facilities, and a highest quartile wPRS was achieved in all types of adult centers in our study. Ongoing efforts to improve pediatric readiness for initial stabilization at nonpediatric centers are needed, particularly in centers that routinely transfer children out.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"69-77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency department pediatric readiness of United States trauma centers in 2021: Trauma center facility characteristics and opportunities for improvement.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline G Melhado, Katherine Remick, Amy Miskovic, Bhavin Patel, Hilary A Hewes, Craig D Newgard, Avery B Nathens, Charles Macias, Lisa Gray, Brian K Yorkgitis, Michael W Dingeldein, Aaron R Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TA.0000000000004387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency department (ED) pediatric readiness has been associated with lower mortality for injured children but has historically been suboptimal in nonpediatric trauma centers. Over the past decade, the National Pediatric Readiness Project (NPRP) has invested resources in improving ED pediatric readiness. This study aimed to quantify current trauma center pediatric readiness and identify associations with center-level characteristics to target further efforts to guide improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study cohort included all centers that responded to the 2021 NPRP national assessment and contributed data to the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) the same calendar year. Center characteristics and pediatric (0-15 years) volume from the NTDB were linked to weighted pediatric readiness scores (wPRSs) obtained from the NPRP assessment. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to determine associations between wPRS and trauma center type as well as center-level facility characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The wPRS was reported for 77% (749 of 973) of centers that contributed to the NTDB. Emergency department pediatric readiness was highest in American College of Surgeons level 1 pediatric trauma centers, but wPRS in the highest quartile was seen among all adult and pediatric trauma center types. Independent predictors of high wPRS included American College of Surgeons level 1 pediatric trauma center verification, pediatric trauma volume, and the presence of a pediatric intensive care unit. Higher-level adult trauma centers and pediatric trauma centers were more likely to have pediatric-specific physician requirements, pediatric emergency care coordinators, and pediatric quality improvement initiatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Emergency department pediatric readiness in trauma centers remains variable and is predictably lower in centers that lack inpatient resources. There is, however, no aspect of ED pediatric readiness that is constrained to high-level pediatric facilities, and a highest quartile wPRS was achieved in all types of adult centers in our study. Ongoing efforts to improve pediatric readiness for initial stabilization at nonpediatric centers are needed, particularly in centers that routinely transfer children out.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"69-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004387\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急诊科(ED)儿科就绪程度与受伤儿童死亡率的降低有关,但在非儿科创伤中心,儿科就绪程度历来不尽如人意。在过去的十年中,国家儿科准备项目(NPRP)投入了大量资源来提高急诊科儿科准备水平。本研究旨在量化目前创伤中心的儿科准备情况,并确定与中心层面特征的关联,从而有的放矢地进一步指导改进工作:研究队列包括所有响应 2021 年 NPRP 国家评估并在同一日历年向国家创伤数据库(NTDB)提供数据的中心。将NTDB中的中心特征和儿科(0-15岁)数量与NPRP评估中获得的加权儿科准备分数(wPRS)联系起来。使用单变量和多变量分析确定 wPRS 与创伤中心类型以及中心级设施特征之间的关联:77%(749/973)的中心向 NTDB 提供了 wPRS 报告。ACS一级儿科创伤中心(PTC)的ED儿科就绪度最高,但所有成人和儿科创伤中心类型的wPRS都处于最高四分位数。高 wPRS 的独立预测因素包括 ACS 一级儿科创伤中心验证、儿科创伤量以及是否设有 PICU。较高水平的成人创伤中心和儿科创伤中心更有可能有儿科特定的医生要求、儿科急诊护理协调员和儿科质量改进计划:结论:创伤中心的急诊室儿科准备程度仍然参差不齐,而且可以预见的是,缺乏住院资源的中心儿科准备程度较低。但是,急诊室儿科就绪程度并不局限于高级儿科机构,在我们的研究中,所有类型的成人中心都达到了 wPRS 最高四分位数。在非儿科中心,尤其是经常将儿童转出的中心,需要不断努力提高儿科初步稳定的准备程度:证据级别:流行病学,III 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emergency department pediatric readiness of United States trauma centers in 2021: Trauma center facility characteristics and opportunities for improvement.

Background: Emergency department (ED) pediatric readiness has been associated with lower mortality for injured children but has historically been suboptimal in nonpediatric trauma centers. Over the past decade, the National Pediatric Readiness Project (NPRP) has invested resources in improving ED pediatric readiness. This study aimed to quantify current trauma center pediatric readiness and identify associations with center-level characteristics to target further efforts to guide improvement.

Methods: The study cohort included all centers that responded to the 2021 NPRP national assessment and contributed data to the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) the same calendar year. Center characteristics and pediatric (0-15 years) volume from the NTDB were linked to weighted pediatric readiness scores (wPRSs) obtained from the NPRP assessment. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to determine associations between wPRS and trauma center type as well as center-level facility characteristics.

Results: The wPRS was reported for 77% (749 of 973) of centers that contributed to the NTDB. Emergency department pediatric readiness was highest in American College of Surgeons level 1 pediatric trauma centers, but wPRS in the highest quartile was seen among all adult and pediatric trauma center types. Independent predictors of high wPRS included American College of Surgeons level 1 pediatric trauma center verification, pediatric trauma volume, and the presence of a pediatric intensive care unit. Higher-level adult trauma centers and pediatric trauma centers were more likely to have pediatric-specific physician requirements, pediatric emergency care coordinators, and pediatric quality improvement initiatives.

Conclusion: Emergency department pediatric readiness in trauma centers remains variable and is predictably lower in centers that lack inpatient resources. There is, however, no aspect of ED pediatric readiness that is constrained to high-level pediatric facilities, and a highest quartile wPRS was achieved in all types of adult centers in our study. Ongoing efforts to improve pediatric readiness for initial stabilization at nonpediatric centers are needed, particularly in centers that routinely transfer children out.

Level of evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
期刊最新文献
Closer to home: Managing more than three rib fractures at level IV trauma centers. How many minutes matter: Association between time saved with air medical transport and survival in trauma patients. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta: What You Need to Know. Not all call is created equally: The impact of culture and sex on burnout related to in-house call. Predictive value of platelet function assays in traumatic brain injury patients on antiplatelet therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1