非甾体抗炎药:风险评估。

W H Inman
{"title":"非甾体抗炎药:风险评估。","authors":"W H Inman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prescription-event monitoring procedure developed at the University of Southampton was used to evaluate five different non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including piroxicam, in approximately 55,000 patients. The overall incidence of side effects was what would be expected. The risks of gastrointestinal haemorrhage and peptic ulceration were spread uniformly across the five drugs under study. No real difference was seen in the incidence of these conditions when patients discontinued the medication or switched to another NSAID. Overall, serious side effects were extremely rare. One provocative finding was the possibility that drugs of this class may exert a cardioprotective effect. There appeared to be a deficit of cases of myocardial infarction while the patients were taking an NSAID. Responsibility for the efficacy and safety of all drugs resides with many people and organizations: the manufacturers, national health departments, licensing departments, and physicians. The press, which has contributed to many unwarranted panics concerning drug safety, also must refrain from using power without responsibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":12056,"journal":{"name":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","volume":"8 1","pages":"71-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: assessment of risks.\",\"authors\":\"W H Inman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The prescription-event monitoring procedure developed at the University of Southampton was used to evaluate five different non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including piroxicam, in approximately 55,000 patients. The overall incidence of side effects was what would be expected. The risks of gastrointestinal haemorrhage and peptic ulceration were spread uniformly across the five drugs under study. No real difference was seen in the incidence of these conditions when patients discontinued the medication or switched to another NSAID. Overall, serious side effects were extremely rare. One provocative finding was the possibility that drugs of this class may exert a cardioprotective effect. There appeared to be a deficit of cases of myocardial infarction while the patients were taking an NSAID. Responsibility for the efficacy and safety of all drugs resides with many people and organizations: the manufacturers, national health departments, licensing departments, and physicians. The press, which has contributed to many unwarranted panics concerning drug safety, also must refrain from using power without responsibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"71-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

南安普顿大学开发的处方事件监测程序用于评估五种不同的非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs),包括吡罗昔康,约55,000名患者。副作用的总体发生率是预期的。胃肠道出血和消化性溃疡的风险在研究中的五种药物中均匀分布。当患者停止用药或改用另一种非甾体抗炎药时,这些情况的发生率没有真正的差异。总的来说,严重的副作用极为罕见。一个令人振奋的发现是,这类药物可能发挥心脏保护作用。当患者服用非甾体抗炎药时,心肌梗死的病例似乎有所减少。对所有药物的有效性和安全性负有责任的是许多人和组织:制造商、国家卫生部门、许可部门和医生。曾多次引发药品安全恐慌的媒体也必须避免不负责任地滥用权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: assessment of risks.

The prescription-event monitoring procedure developed at the University of Southampton was used to evaluate five different non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including piroxicam, in approximately 55,000 patients. The overall incidence of side effects was what would be expected. The risks of gastrointestinal haemorrhage and peptic ulceration were spread uniformly across the five drugs under study. No real difference was seen in the incidence of these conditions when patients discontinued the medication or switched to another NSAID. Overall, serious side effects were extremely rare. One provocative finding was the possibility that drugs of this class may exert a cardioprotective effect. There appeared to be a deficit of cases of myocardial infarction while the patients were taking an NSAID. Responsibility for the efficacy and safety of all drugs resides with many people and organizations: the manufacturers, national health departments, licensing departments, and physicians. The press, which has contributed to many unwarranted panics concerning drug safety, also must refrain from using power without responsibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flurbiprofen local action transcutaneous (LAT): clinical evaluation in the treatment of acute ankle sprains. NSAIDs and the gut--where are we now? Review of Arthrotec clinical data. Rheumatological audit--a general practice perspective. Arthrotec, diclofenac and ibuprofen in general practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1