腹腔镜和内镜合作手术治疗肿瘤直径大于 5 厘米的胃肠道间质瘤的可行性。

IF 0.7 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INVESTIGATION Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2152/jmi.71.148
Yosuke Iwakawa, Masaaki Nishi, Yuma Wada, Kozo Yoshikawa, Chie Takasu, Takuya Tokunaga, Toshihiro Nakao, Hideya Kashihara, Toshiaki Yoshimoto, Takayuki Noma, Mitsuo Shimada
{"title":"腹腔镜和内镜合作手术治疗肿瘤直径大于 5 厘米的胃肠道间质瘤的可行性。","authors":"Yosuke Iwakawa, Masaaki Nishi, Yuma Wada, Kozo Yoshikawa, Chie Takasu, Takuya Tokunaga, Toshihiro Nakao, Hideya Kashihara, Toshiaki Yoshimoto, Takayuki Noma, Mitsuo Shimada","doi":"10.2152/jmi.71.148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is an effective treatment for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The utility of LECS for gastric GISTs of > 5 cm remains controversial. This study was performed to investigate the feasibility of LECS for gastric GISTs with a tumor diameter of >5 cm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 43 patients with gastric GISTs who underwent LECS or laparoscopic partial gastrectomy (Lap-Partial Gx). We compared the surgical outcomes of LECS versus Lap-Partial Gx and of LECS for a tumor diameter of > 5 versus ≤ 5 cm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the comparison of LECS versus Lap-Partial Gx, there were no significant intergroup differences in the operative time or blood loss volume. The morbidity rate was similar between the groups. No postoperative mortality occurred in either group. In the comparison of LECS for a tumor diameter of > 5 versus ≤ 5 cm, there were no significant intergroup differences in operative time, or blood loss volume. The morbidity rate was similar between the > 5-cm and ≤ 5-cm groups (0.0% vs. 4.5%, respectively ; p = 0.56). Additionally, no recurrence or death occurred during follow-up in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LECS is a feasible option for gastric GISTs with a tumor diameter of > 5 cm. J. Med. Invest. 71 : 148-153, February, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":46910,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INVESTIGATION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor with tumor diameter of >5 cm.\",\"authors\":\"Yosuke Iwakawa, Masaaki Nishi, Yuma Wada, Kozo Yoshikawa, Chie Takasu, Takuya Tokunaga, Toshihiro Nakao, Hideya Kashihara, Toshiaki Yoshimoto, Takayuki Noma, Mitsuo Shimada\",\"doi\":\"10.2152/jmi.71.148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is an effective treatment for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The utility of LECS for gastric GISTs of > 5 cm remains controversial. This study was performed to investigate the feasibility of LECS for gastric GISTs with a tumor diameter of >5 cm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 43 patients with gastric GISTs who underwent LECS or laparoscopic partial gastrectomy (Lap-Partial Gx). We compared the surgical outcomes of LECS versus Lap-Partial Gx and of LECS for a tumor diameter of > 5 versus ≤ 5 cm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the comparison of LECS versus Lap-Partial Gx, there were no significant intergroup differences in the operative time or blood loss volume. The morbidity rate was similar between the groups. No postoperative mortality occurred in either group. In the comparison of LECS for a tumor diameter of > 5 versus ≤ 5 cm, there were no significant intergroup differences in operative time, or blood loss volume. The morbidity rate was similar between the > 5-cm and ≤ 5-cm groups (0.0% vs. 4.5%, respectively ; p = 0.56). Additionally, no recurrence or death occurred during follow-up in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LECS is a feasible option for gastric GISTs with a tumor diameter of > 5 cm. J. Med. Invest. 71 : 148-153, February, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INVESTIGATION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INVESTIGATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2152/jmi.71.148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INVESTIGATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2152/jmi.71.148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹腔镜和内镜合作手术(LECS)是治疗胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)的有效方法。对于大于 5 厘米的胃胃肠道间质瘤,LECS 的实用性仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨 LECS 治疗肿瘤直径大于 5 厘米的胃 GIST 的可行性:我们分析了 43 例接受 LECS 或腹腔镜胃部分切除术(Lap-Partial Gx)的胃 GIST 患者。我们比较了LECS与腹腔镜胃部分切除术的手术效果,以及肿瘤直径大于5厘米与小于5厘米时LECS的手术效果:结果:在腹腔镜胃癌切除术与腹腔镜部分切除术的比较中,手术时间和失血量在组间无明显差异。两组的发病率相似。两组均未发生术后死亡。在肿瘤直径大于 5 厘米和小于 5 厘米的 LECS 比较中,手术时间和失血量在组间无明显差异。肿瘤直径大于 5 厘米组和小于 5 厘米组的发病率相似(分别为 0.0% 和 4.5% ;P = 0.56)。此外,两组患者在随访期间均未出现复发或死亡:结论:对于肿瘤直径大于 5 厘米的胃 GIST,LECS 是一种可行的选择。J. Med.Invest.71 : 148-153, February, 2024.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor with tumor diameter of >5 cm.

Background: Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is an effective treatment for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The utility of LECS for gastric GISTs of > 5 cm remains controversial. This study was performed to investigate the feasibility of LECS for gastric GISTs with a tumor diameter of >5 cm.

Methods: We analyzed 43 patients with gastric GISTs who underwent LECS or laparoscopic partial gastrectomy (Lap-Partial Gx). We compared the surgical outcomes of LECS versus Lap-Partial Gx and of LECS for a tumor diameter of > 5 versus ≤ 5 cm.

Results: In the comparison of LECS versus Lap-Partial Gx, there were no significant intergroup differences in the operative time or blood loss volume. The morbidity rate was similar between the groups. No postoperative mortality occurred in either group. In the comparison of LECS for a tumor diameter of > 5 versus ≤ 5 cm, there were no significant intergroup differences in operative time, or blood loss volume. The morbidity rate was similar between the > 5-cm and ≤ 5-cm groups (0.0% vs. 4.5%, respectively ; p = 0.56). Additionally, no recurrence or death occurred during follow-up in either group.

Conclusion: LECS is a feasible option for gastric GISTs with a tumor diameter of > 5 cm. J. Med. Invest. 71 : 148-153, February, 2024.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INVESTIGATION
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INVESTIGATION MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Changes in intestinal microbiota and biochemical parameters in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome induced by the prolonged addition of soluble fibers to usual drug therapy. Characterization of Outer Membrane Vesicles Produced by Vibrio vulnificus. Clarification of Psychiatric Nurses' Intentions and Analysis Contents in Observing Schizophrenia Patient. Current pharmacotherapies for advanced lung cancer with pre-existing interstitial lung disease : A literature review and future perspectives. Feasibility of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor with tumor diameter of >5 cm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1