[延深聚焦眼内透镜植入术的效果]。

Q3 Medicine Vestnik oftalmologii Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.17116/oftalma202414002140
K B Pershin, N F Pashinova, A Yu Tsygankov, E A Antonov, I V Kosova, E A Korneeva
{"title":"[延深聚焦眼内透镜植入术的效果]。","authors":"K B Pershin, N F Pashinova, A Yu Tsygankov, E A Antonov, I V Kosova, E A Korneeva","doi":"10.17116/oftalma202414002140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) are the latest IOL designs. In recent years, several models of EDOF IOLs have become available in Russia, two of which (Tecnis Symfony and Acrysof IQ Vivity) are implanted in our clinic. Comparative studies devoted to the results of implantation of the new EDOF IOLs are rare in the available literature.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This article compares the outcomes of implantation of two EDOF IOLs in patients with presbyopia and/or cataract.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The prospective study included 60 patients (81 eyes) after implantation of EDOF IOL Tecnis Symfony (32 patients, 45 eyes; group 1) or EDOF IOL AcrySof IQ Vivity (28 patients, 36 eyes; group 2). The mean follow-up period was 3.9±1.3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups showed a significant (<i>p</i><0.05) increase in uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA), intermediate visual acuity (UCIVA), and distance visual acuity (UCDVA) at the maximum follow-up time compared to preoperative values. In group 1, the best corrected near visual acuity (BCNVA) increased from 0.61±0.10 to 0.82±0.16 at the maximum follow-up time, and in group 2 - from 0.58±0.08 to 0.67±0.12 (<i>p</i>>0.05). Both groups showed a significant increase in best corrected intermediate and distance visual acuity (BCIVA and BCDVA) at the maximum follow-up time. The increase in the indicator compared to the preoperative period was not significant in both groups (<i>p</i>>0.05). The frequency of side optical phenomena was low in both groups. No significant differences were found between the groups (<i>p</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents a comparative analysis of the results of implantation of two different EDOF IOLs. Both lenses were comparable in most of the studied parameters, including providing good distance and intermediate vision, functional near vision, as well as a low frequency of side optical phenomena. In all cases the patients were satisfied with the results of the surgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":23529,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik oftalmologii","volume":"140 2","pages":"40-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Outcomes of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses implantation].\",\"authors\":\"K B Pershin, N F Pashinova, A Yu Tsygankov, E A Antonov, I V Kosova, E A Korneeva\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/oftalma202414002140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) are the latest IOL designs. In recent years, several models of EDOF IOLs have become available in Russia, two of which (Tecnis Symfony and Acrysof IQ Vivity) are implanted in our clinic. Comparative studies devoted to the results of implantation of the new EDOF IOLs are rare in the available literature.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This article compares the outcomes of implantation of two EDOF IOLs in patients with presbyopia and/or cataract.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The prospective study included 60 patients (81 eyes) after implantation of EDOF IOL Tecnis Symfony (32 patients, 45 eyes; group 1) or EDOF IOL AcrySof IQ Vivity (28 patients, 36 eyes; group 2). The mean follow-up period was 3.9±1.3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups showed a significant (<i>p</i><0.05) increase in uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA), intermediate visual acuity (UCIVA), and distance visual acuity (UCDVA) at the maximum follow-up time compared to preoperative values. In group 1, the best corrected near visual acuity (BCNVA) increased from 0.61±0.10 to 0.82±0.16 at the maximum follow-up time, and in group 2 - from 0.58±0.08 to 0.67±0.12 (<i>p</i>>0.05). Both groups showed a significant increase in best corrected intermediate and distance visual acuity (BCIVA and BCDVA) at the maximum follow-up time. The increase in the indicator compared to the preoperative period was not significant in both groups (<i>p</i>>0.05). The frequency of side optical phenomena was low in both groups. No significant differences were found between the groups (<i>p</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents a comparative analysis of the results of implantation of two different EDOF IOLs. Both lenses were comparable in most of the studied parameters, including providing good distance and intermediate vision, functional near vision, as well as a low frequency of side optical phenomena. In all cases the patients were satisfied with the results of the surgical intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik oftalmologii\",\"volume\":\"140 2\",\"pages\":\"40-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik oftalmologii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202414002140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik oftalmologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202414002140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

延伸焦深(EDOF)眼内人工晶体(IOL)是最新的人工晶体设计。近年来,俄罗斯出现了多种型号的 EDOF 人工晶体,本诊所植入了其中两种(Tecnis Symfony 和 Acrysof IQ Vivity)。目的:本文对老花眼和/或白内障患者植入两种 EDOF 人工晶体的效果进行了比较:这项前瞻性研究纳入了 60 名患者(81 只眼),他们都植入了 EDOF IOL Tecnis Symfony(32 名患者,45 只眼;第 1 组)或 EDOF IOL AcrySof IQ Vivity(28 名患者,36 只眼;第 2 组)。平均随访时间为 3.9±1.3 个月:结果:所有组的最佳视力均有显著提高(pp>0.05)。在最长随访时间内,两组患者的最佳矫正中远距离视力(BCIVA 和 BCDVA)均有明显提高。与术前相比,两组患者的指标均无明显增加(P>0.05)。两组患者出现侧光现象的频率都很低。结论:本研究对两种不同的 EDOF 人工晶体的植入结果进行了比较分析。这两种人工晶体在大多数研究参数上都具有可比性,包括提供良好的远视力和中视力、功能性近视力以及较低的侧光现象发生率。在所有病例中,患者都对手术效果表示满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Outcomes of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses implantation].

Extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) are the latest IOL designs. In recent years, several models of EDOF IOLs have become available in Russia, two of which (Tecnis Symfony and Acrysof IQ Vivity) are implanted in our clinic. Comparative studies devoted to the results of implantation of the new EDOF IOLs are rare in the available literature.

Purpose: This article compares the outcomes of implantation of two EDOF IOLs in patients with presbyopia and/or cataract.

Material and methods: The prospective study included 60 patients (81 eyes) after implantation of EDOF IOL Tecnis Symfony (32 patients, 45 eyes; group 1) or EDOF IOL AcrySof IQ Vivity (28 patients, 36 eyes; group 2). The mean follow-up period was 3.9±1.3 months.

Results: All groups showed a significant (p<0.05) increase in uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA), intermediate visual acuity (UCIVA), and distance visual acuity (UCDVA) at the maximum follow-up time compared to preoperative values. In group 1, the best corrected near visual acuity (BCNVA) increased from 0.61±0.10 to 0.82±0.16 at the maximum follow-up time, and in group 2 - from 0.58±0.08 to 0.67±0.12 (p>0.05). Both groups showed a significant increase in best corrected intermediate and distance visual acuity (BCIVA and BCDVA) at the maximum follow-up time. The increase in the indicator compared to the preoperative period was not significant in both groups (p>0.05). The frequency of side optical phenomena was low in both groups. No significant differences were found between the groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion: This study presents a comparative analysis of the results of implantation of two different EDOF IOLs. Both lenses were comparable in most of the studied parameters, including providing good distance and intermediate vision, functional near vision, as well as a low frequency of side optical phenomena. In all cases the patients were satisfied with the results of the surgical intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vestnik oftalmologii
Vestnik oftalmologii Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The journal publishes materials on the diagnosis and treatment of eye diseases, hygiene of vision, prevention of ophthalmic affections, history of Russian ophthalmology, organization of ophthalmological aid to the population, as well as the problems of special equipment. Original scientific articles and surveys on urgent problems of theory and practice of Russian and foreign ophthalmology are published. The journal contains book reviews on ophthalmology, information on the activities of ophthalmologists" scientific societies, chronicle of congresses and conferences.The journal is intended for ophthalmologists and scientific workers dealing with clinical problems of diseases of the eye and physiology of vision.
期刊最新文献
[Structural and functional features of the eye in Marfan syndrome. Report 2. Changes in the anatomical complex of the lens]. [Subfamily of betaherpesviruses as a cause of epithelial and stromal keratitis]. [Terson syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia (case report)]. [The association between myopia and glaucoma]. [The effect of pleoptic treatment on the stability of visual fixation in children and adolescents with amblyopia of various degrees].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1