医疗系统结构及其对治疗效果的影响:加拿大的经验。

Q3 Medicine Healthcare Management Forum Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1177/08404704241248559
Braden J Manns, Stephanie Hastings, Greg Marchildon, Tom Noseworthy
{"title":"医疗系统结构及其对治疗效果的影响:加拿大的经验。","authors":"Braden J Manns, Stephanie Hastings, Greg Marchildon, Tom Noseworthy","doi":"10.1177/08404704241248559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare delivery systems in Canada are structured using three models: individual institutions, health regions, and single provincial systems, usually with smaller geographic zones. The comparative ability of these models to improve care, outcomes, and the Quadruple Aim is largely unstudied. We reviewed Canadian studies examining outcomes of provincial healthcare delivery system restructuring. Across models, results were inconsistent, and quality of evidence was low. For all provinces, primary care sits outside healthcare delivery systems, with limited governance and integration. The single provincial model can reduce costs of non-clinical support functions like finance, human resources, and analytics. This model may also be best at reducing variations in care, improving electronic information integration that enables clinical decision support and reporting, and supporting the provincial spread and scale of innovations, but further refinements are required and existing studies have major limitations, limiting definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":39854,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Management Forum","volume":" ","pages":"340-350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health system structure and its influence on outcomes: The Canadian experience.\",\"authors\":\"Braden J Manns, Stephanie Hastings, Greg Marchildon, Tom Noseworthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08404704241248559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Healthcare delivery systems in Canada are structured using three models: individual institutions, health regions, and single provincial systems, usually with smaller geographic zones. The comparative ability of these models to improve care, outcomes, and the Quadruple Aim is largely unstudied. We reviewed Canadian studies examining outcomes of provincial healthcare delivery system restructuring. Across models, results were inconsistent, and quality of evidence was low. For all provinces, primary care sits outside healthcare delivery systems, with limited governance and integration. The single provincial model can reduce costs of non-clinical support functions like finance, human resources, and analytics. This model may also be best at reducing variations in care, improving electronic information integration that enables clinical decision support and reporting, and supporting the provincial spread and scale of innovations, but further refinements are required and existing studies have major limitations, limiting definitive conclusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Management Forum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"340-350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348631/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Management Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704241248559\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Management Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704241248559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加拿大的医疗保健服务系统结构有三种模式:单个机构、卫生区域和单一省级系统,通常有较小的地理区域。这些模式在改善医疗服务、提高疗效和实现 "四重目标 "方面的比较能力在很大程度上尚未得到研究。我们回顾了加拿大有关省级医疗保健服务系统重组结果的研究。各种模式的结果并不一致,证据质量也不高。在所有省份中,初级医疗都处于医疗服务体系之外,治理和整合程度有限。单一省级模式可以降低财务、人力资源和分析等非临床支持职能的成本。这种模式在减少护理差异、改善电子信息集成以实现临床决策支持和报告,以及支持创新在各省的推广和规模化方面可能也是最有效的,但还需要进一步完善,而且现有的研究存在很大的局限性,从而限制了最终结论的得出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health system structure and its influence on outcomes: The Canadian experience.

Healthcare delivery systems in Canada are structured using three models: individual institutions, health regions, and single provincial systems, usually with smaller geographic zones. The comparative ability of these models to improve care, outcomes, and the Quadruple Aim is largely unstudied. We reviewed Canadian studies examining outcomes of provincial healthcare delivery system restructuring. Across models, results were inconsistent, and quality of evidence was low. For all provinces, primary care sits outside healthcare delivery systems, with limited governance and integration. The single provincial model can reduce costs of non-clinical support functions like finance, human resources, and analytics. This model may also be best at reducing variations in care, improving electronic information integration that enables clinical decision support and reporting, and supporting the provincial spread and scale of innovations, but further refinements are required and existing studies have major limitations, limiting definitive conclusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Management Forum
Healthcare Management Forum Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Healthcare Management Forum is the official journal of the Canadian College of Health Service Executives. It is the only peer-reviewed journal that covers issues related to advances in health services management, theory and practice in a Canadian context. The quality of its contributors, the rigorous review process and the leading-edge topics make it truly unique!
期刊最新文献
An ecological approach to humanizing healthcare organizations for patients, healthcare providers, and communities. Integrating informal and formal care: An innovative, scalable program blueprint. From perpetual pilots to sustainable transformation: Scaling up geriatric care. Preventing health care worker burnout in primary care settings through the trauma-informed CARES leadership competency model. Considerations for emergency department virtual triage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1