检测临床分离的金黄色葡萄球菌的生物膜生成和抗生素敏感性模式。

IF 1.1 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY Journal of Pathogens Pub Date : 2024-05-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/2342468
Sushant Pokhrel, Namrata Sharma, Suraj Aryal, Rachita Khadka, Tika Bahadur Thapa, Pawan Pandey, Govardhan Joshi
{"title":"检测临床分离的金黄色葡萄球菌的生物膜生成和抗生素敏感性模式。","authors":"Sushant Pokhrel, Namrata Sharma, Suraj Aryal, Rachita Khadka, Tika Bahadur Thapa, Pawan Pandey, Govardhan Joshi","doi":"10.1155/2024/2342468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The increasing antibiotic resistance and the ability to form biofilms in medical devices have become the leading cause of severe infections associated with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (<i>S. aureus</i>). Since the bacteria living in biofilms can exhibit 10- to 1,000-fold increase in antibiotic resistance and implicate chronic infectious diseases, the detection of <i>S. aureus</i> ability to form biofilms is of great importance for managing, minimizing, and effectively treating infections caused by it. This study aimed to compare the tube and tissue culture methods to detect biofilm production and antibiotic susceptibility in MRSA and MSSA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The <i>S. aureus</i> isolates were identified by the examination of the colony morphology, Gram staining, and various biochemical tests. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of all isolates was performed by the modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method as recommended by CLSI guidelines. MRSA screening was performed phenotypically using a cefoxitin disc (30 <i>µ</i>g). Isolates were tested for inducible resistance using the D-test, and two phenotypic methods detected biofilm formation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 982 nonrepeated clinical specimens, <i>S. aureus</i> was isolated from 103 (10.48%). Among 103 clinical isolates of <i>S. aureus</i>, 54 (52.42%) isolates were MRSA, and 49 (47.57%) were MSSA. Among 54 MRSA isolates, the inducible MLSB phenotype was observed in 23/54 (42.59%) with a positive D-test. By TCP method, 26 (48.1%) MRSA isolates were strong biofilm producers, whereas, among all MSSA isolates, only 6 (12.2%) were strong biofilm producers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRSA showed strong biofilm production in comparison with MSSA. The TCP method is a recommended reliable method to detect the biofilm among <i>S. aureus</i> isolates, and the TM method could be useful for the screening of biofilm production in <i>S. aureus</i> in the routine clinical laboratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":16788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathogens","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of Biofilm Production and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern among Clinically Isolated <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Sushant Pokhrel, Namrata Sharma, Suraj Aryal, Rachita Khadka, Tika Bahadur Thapa, Pawan Pandey, Govardhan Joshi\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/2342468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The increasing antibiotic resistance and the ability to form biofilms in medical devices have become the leading cause of severe infections associated with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (<i>S. aureus</i>). Since the bacteria living in biofilms can exhibit 10- to 1,000-fold increase in antibiotic resistance and implicate chronic infectious diseases, the detection of <i>S. aureus</i> ability to form biofilms is of great importance for managing, minimizing, and effectively treating infections caused by it. This study aimed to compare the tube and tissue culture methods to detect biofilm production and antibiotic susceptibility in MRSA and MSSA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The <i>S. aureus</i> isolates were identified by the examination of the colony morphology, Gram staining, and various biochemical tests. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of all isolates was performed by the modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method as recommended by CLSI guidelines. MRSA screening was performed phenotypically using a cefoxitin disc (30 <i>µ</i>g). Isolates were tested for inducible resistance using the D-test, and two phenotypic methods detected biofilm formation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 982 nonrepeated clinical specimens, <i>S. aureus</i> was isolated from 103 (10.48%). Among 103 clinical isolates of <i>S. aureus</i>, 54 (52.42%) isolates were MRSA, and 49 (47.57%) were MSSA. Among 54 MRSA isolates, the inducible MLSB phenotype was observed in 23/54 (42.59%) with a positive D-test. By TCP method, 26 (48.1%) MRSA isolates were strong biofilm producers, whereas, among all MSSA isolates, only 6 (12.2%) were strong biofilm producers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRSA showed strong biofilm production in comparison with MSSA. The TCP method is a recommended reliable method to detect the biofilm among <i>S. aureus</i> isolates, and the TM method could be useful for the screening of biofilm production in <i>S. aureus</i> in the routine clinical laboratory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathogens\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090675/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathogens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2342468\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2342468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:抗生素耐药性和在医疗器械中形成生物膜的能力不断增强,已成为金黄色葡萄球菌(S. aureus)引起严重感染的主要原因。由于生活在生物膜中的细菌对抗生素的耐药性可增加 10 到 1000 倍,并会引发慢性传染病,因此检测金黄色葡萄球菌形成生物膜的能力对于管理、减少和有效治疗由其引起的感染具有重要意义。本研究旨在比较试管培养法和组织培养法检测 MRSA 和 MSSA 的生物膜生成和抗生素敏感性:通过菌落形态学检查、革兰氏染色和各种生化测试对分离出的金黄色葡萄球菌进行鉴定。根据 CLSI 指南的建议,采用改良柯比鲍尔盘扩散法对所有分离菌株进行抗菌药敏感性检测。使用头孢西丁圆片(30 微克)对 MRSA 进行表型筛选。使用 D 试验检测分离株的诱导耐药性,并使用两种表型方法检测生物膜的形成:结果:在 982 份非重复临床标本中,有 103 份(10.48%)分离出金葡菌。在 103 例临床分离的金黄色葡萄球菌中,54 例(52.42%)为 MRSA,49 例(47.57%)为 MSSA。在 54 个 MRSA 分离物中,有 23 个/54 个(42.59%)观察到可诱导的 MLSB 表型,D 测试结果呈阳性。根据 TCP 方法,26 株(48.1%)MRSA 分离物具有较强的生物膜生成能力,而在所有 MSSA 分离物中,只有 6 株(12.2%)具有较强的生物膜生成能力:结论:与 MSSA 相比,MRSA 具有较强的生物膜生成能力。结论:与 MSSA 相比,MRSA 具有较强的生物膜产生能力。TCP 法是检测金黄色葡萄球菌分离物中生物膜的可靠推荐方法,TM 法可用于常规临床实验室筛选金黄色葡萄球菌的生物膜产生情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Detection of Biofilm Production and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern among Clinically Isolated Staphylococcus aureus.

Aim: The increasing antibiotic resistance and the ability to form biofilms in medical devices have become the leading cause of severe infections associated with Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). Since the bacteria living in biofilms can exhibit 10- to 1,000-fold increase in antibiotic resistance and implicate chronic infectious diseases, the detection of S. aureus ability to form biofilms is of great importance for managing, minimizing, and effectively treating infections caused by it. This study aimed to compare the tube and tissue culture methods to detect biofilm production and antibiotic susceptibility in MRSA and MSSA.

Materials and methods: The S. aureus isolates were identified by the examination of the colony morphology, Gram staining, and various biochemical tests. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of all isolates was performed by the modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method as recommended by CLSI guidelines. MRSA screening was performed phenotypically using a cefoxitin disc (30 µg). Isolates were tested for inducible resistance using the D-test, and two phenotypic methods detected biofilm formation.

Results: Among 982 nonrepeated clinical specimens, S. aureus was isolated from 103 (10.48%). Among 103 clinical isolates of S. aureus, 54 (52.42%) isolates were MRSA, and 49 (47.57%) were MSSA. Among 54 MRSA isolates, the inducible MLSB phenotype was observed in 23/54 (42.59%) with a positive D-test. By TCP method, 26 (48.1%) MRSA isolates were strong biofilm producers, whereas, among all MSSA isolates, only 6 (12.2%) were strong biofilm producers.

Conclusion: MRSA showed strong biofilm production in comparison with MSSA. The TCP method is a recommended reliable method to detect the biofilm among S. aureus isolates, and the TM method could be useful for the screening of biofilm production in S. aureus in the routine clinical laboratory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathogens
Journal of Pathogens MICROBIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Establishment of a STING-Deficient HepG2 Cell Line through CRISPR/Cas9 System and Evaluation of Its Effects on Salmonella Replication. Fermented Polyherbal Formulation Ameliorates the Severity of Acute Multiple Antibiotics-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Infected Burn Wound in a Rat Burn Model Detection of Biofilm Production and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern among Clinically Isolated Staphylococcus aureus. Seroprevalence of Human Brucellosis among Syrian Refugees in Jordan, 2022 Determination of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Factors and Their Association with Clinical and Demographic Factors in Kenya.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1