内镜超声引导下胃肠造口术治疗胃出口梗阻的不良事件--系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY United European Gastroenterology Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1002/ueg2.12576
Suprabhat Giri, Sidharth Harindranath, Babu P Mohan, Vaneet Jearth, Jijo Varghese, Marko Kozyk, Aditya Kale, Sridhar Sundaram
{"title":"内镜超声引导下胃肠造口术治疗胃出口梗阻的不良事件--系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Suprabhat Giri, Sidharth Harindranath, Babu P Mohan, Vaneet Jearth, Jijo Varghese, Marko Kozyk, Aditya Kale, Sridhar Sundaram","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.12576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The technical and clinical effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided gastroenterostomy (GE) has been reported by several meta-analyses, but few of them have addressed the adverse events (AE). The goal of the current meta-analysis was to analyze the AEs associated with various types of EUS-GE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All relevant studies reporting the AEs with EUS-GE were searched from 2000 to 31st March 2023 in MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus. The event rates were pooled using a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 studies (n = 1846) were included in the meta-analysis. The present meta-analysis reports a pooled technical success rate of 96.9% (95.9-98.0; I<sup>2</sup> = 29.3%) with a pooled clinical success rate of 90.6% (88.5-92.7; I<sup>2</sup> = 60.9%). The pooled incidence of overall AEs with EUS-GE was 13.0% (10.3-15.7; I<sup>2</sup> = 69.7%), with the commonest being maldeployment of the stent, seen in 4.6% (3.2-6.0; I<sup>2</sup> = 50.6%). The pooled incidences of serious AE and procedure-related mortality were 1.2% (0.7-1.8; I<sup>2</sup> = 1.9%) and 0.3% (0.0-0.7; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%), respectively. Subgroup analysis of studies using only the free-hand technique showed a significantly lower overall AE and maldeployment but not serious AE and other individual AEs. The pooled incidences of delayed stent migration and stent occlusion were 0.5% (0.0-1.1; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%) and 0.8% (0.2-1.3; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite a technical and clinical success rate of >90%, AEs are seen in around one-seventh of the cases of EUS-GE, maldeployment being the commonest. However, the pooled incidence of serious AE and mortality remains low, which is reassuring.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse events with endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction-A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Suprabhat Giri, Sidharth Harindranath, Babu P Mohan, Vaneet Jearth, Jijo Varghese, Marko Kozyk, Aditya Kale, Sridhar Sundaram\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ueg2.12576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The technical and clinical effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided gastroenterostomy (GE) has been reported by several meta-analyses, but few of them have addressed the adverse events (AE). The goal of the current meta-analysis was to analyze the AEs associated with various types of EUS-GE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All relevant studies reporting the AEs with EUS-GE were searched from 2000 to 31st March 2023 in MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus. The event rates were pooled using a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 studies (n = 1846) were included in the meta-analysis. The present meta-analysis reports a pooled technical success rate of 96.9% (95.9-98.0; I<sup>2</sup> = 29.3%) with a pooled clinical success rate of 90.6% (88.5-92.7; I<sup>2</sup> = 60.9%). The pooled incidence of overall AEs with EUS-GE was 13.0% (10.3-15.7; I<sup>2</sup> = 69.7%), with the commonest being maldeployment of the stent, seen in 4.6% (3.2-6.0; I<sup>2</sup> = 50.6%). The pooled incidences of serious AE and procedure-related mortality were 1.2% (0.7-1.8; I<sup>2</sup> = 1.9%) and 0.3% (0.0-0.7; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%), respectively. Subgroup analysis of studies using only the free-hand technique showed a significantly lower overall AE and maldeployment but not serious AE and other individual AEs. The pooled incidences of delayed stent migration and stent occlusion were 0.5% (0.0-1.1; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%) and 0.8% (0.2-1.3; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite a technical and clinical success rate of >90%, AEs are seen in around one-seventh of the cases of EUS-GE, maldeployment being the commonest. However, the pooled incidence of serious AE and mortality remains low, which is reassuring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"United European Gastroenterology Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497769/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"United European Gastroenterology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12576\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12576","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多项荟萃分析报告了内镜超声(EUS)引导下胃肠造口术(GE)的技术和临床有效性,但很少有荟萃分析涉及不良事件(AE)。本次荟萃分析的目的是分析与各种类型的 EUS-GE 相关的 AE:方法:从 2000 年到 2023 年 3 月 31 日,在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Scopus 中检索了所有报告 EUS-GE AEs 的相关研究。采用随机效应模型对事件发生率进行汇总:共有 36 项研究(n = 1846)被纳入荟萃分析。本荟萃分析的汇总技术成功率为 96.9% (95.9-98.0; I2 = 29.3%),汇总临床成功率为 90.6% (88.5-92.7; I2 = 60.9%)。EUS-GE 的总体 AE 总发生率为 13.0% (10.3-15.7; I2 = 69.7%),其中最常见的是支架部署不当,发生率为 4.6% (3.2-6.0; I2 = 50.6%)。严重AE和手术相关死亡率的汇总发生率分别为1.2% (0.7-1.8; I2 = 1.9%) 和0.3% (0.0-0.7; I2 = 0.0%)。对仅使用徒手技术的研究进行的分组分析表明,总体 AE 和部署不当的发生率明显较低,但严重 AE 和其他个别 AE 的发生率却不低。支架延迟移位和支架闭塞的总发生率分别为0.5% (0.0-1.1; I2 = 0.0%) 和0.8% (0.2-1.3; I2 = 0.0%):尽管EUS-GE的技术和临床成功率超过90%,但仍有约七分之一的病例出现AEs,其中最常见的是部署不当。然而,严重AE和死亡率的总发生率仍然很低,这一点令人欣慰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adverse events with endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The technical and clinical effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided gastroenterostomy (GE) has been reported by several meta-analyses, but few of them have addressed the adverse events (AE). The goal of the current meta-analysis was to analyze the AEs associated with various types of EUS-GE.

Methods: All relevant studies reporting the AEs with EUS-GE were searched from 2000 to 31st March 2023 in MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus. The event rates were pooled using a random effects model.

Results: A total of 36 studies (n = 1846) were included in the meta-analysis. The present meta-analysis reports a pooled technical success rate of 96.9% (95.9-98.0; I2 = 29.3%) with a pooled clinical success rate of 90.6% (88.5-92.7; I2 = 60.9%). The pooled incidence of overall AEs with EUS-GE was 13.0% (10.3-15.7; I2 = 69.7%), with the commonest being maldeployment of the stent, seen in 4.6% (3.2-6.0; I2 = 50.6%). The pooled incidences of serious AE and procedure-related mortality were 1.2% (0.7-1.8; I2 = 1.9%) and 0.3% (0.0-0.7; I2 = 0.0%), respectively. Subgroup analysis of studies using only the free-hand technique showed a significantly lower overall AE and maldeployment but not serious AE and other individual AEs. The pooled incidences of delayed stent migration and stent occlusion were 0.5% (0.0-1.1; I2 = 0.0%) and 0.8% (0.2-1.3; I2 = 0.0%), respectively.

Conclusion: Despite a technical and clinical success rate of >90%, AEs are seen in around one-seventh of the cases of EUS-GE, maldeployment being the commonest. However, the pooled incidence of serious AE and mortality remains low, which is reassuring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
United European Gastroenterology Journal
United European Gastroenterology Journal GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
147
期刊介绍: United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal) is the official Journal of the United European Gastroenterology (UEG), a professional non-profit organisation combining all the leading European societies concerned with digestive disease. UEG’s member societies represent over 22,000 specialists working across medicine, surgery, paediatrics, GI oncology and endoscopy, which makes UEG a unique platform for collaboration and the exchange of knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Early colorectal cancer diagnosis: A novel methylated stool DNA model enhanced the diagnostic efficiency. Fecal calprotectin: A promising readily available tool associated with outcome in patients with cirrhosis. Hearing what isn't said. Selection of individuals who may benefit from pancreatic cancer surveillance. Variation in the detection of lymphovascular invasion in T1 colorectal cancer and its impact on treatment: A nationwide Dutch study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1