研究子宫切除术(含或不含输卵管切除术)与心血管疾病及全因、心血管或癌症死亡率的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.17843
Yuge Chen, Fengjuan Li, Lei Liang, Huiling Hua, Shizheng Liu, Zihe Yu, Qiuyu Chen, Shufeng Huang, Pei Qin
{"title":"研究子宫切除术(含或不含输卵管切除术)与心血管疾病及全因、心血管或癌症死亡率的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yuge Chen,&nbsp;Fengjuan Li,&nbsp;Lei Liang,&nbsp;Huiling Hua,&nbsp;Shizheng Liu,&nbsp;Zihe Yu,&nbsp;Qiuyu Chen,&nbsp;Shufeng Huang,&nbsp;Pei Qin","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.17843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The associations between hysterectomy and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality remains unlcear and a meta-analysis with cohort studies is lacking.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies to investigate the relationship between hysterectomy and CVD, coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, heart failure, and all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality. We further explored the effect of oophorectomy on the association between hysterectomy and these health outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Search strategy</h3>\n \n <p>PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched up to 24 July 2023.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Selection criteria</h3>\n \n <p>Cohort studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data collection and analysis</h3>\n \n <p>Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. We used <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> to assess the heterogeneity between studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main results</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis. Hysterectomy was significantly associated with an increased risk of CVD (pooled HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.09–1.13; <i>n</i> = 6; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0) and stroke (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04–1.14; <i>n</i> = 7; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 52%), but with a decreased risk of cancer mortality (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86–1.00; <i>n</i> = 4; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 81%). No significant association was observed between hysterectomy and CHD (<i>n</i> = 10; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 83%), all-cause mortality (<i>n</i> = 8; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 81%) or cardiovascular mortality (<i>n</i> = 7; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 89%). Hysterectomy with and without oophorectomy was significantly associated with CVD and stroke risk, but showed a larger effect size for hysterectomy with oophorectomy. A significantly increased risk of CHD was observed in the subgroup of hysterectomy with oophorectomy, but not for the subgroup of hysterectomy alone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Hysterectomy may increase the risk of CVD, CHD and stroke, but not all-cause, cardiovascular or cancer mortality. Hysterectomy with oophorectomy may have a higher risk of CVD, CHD and stroke than hysterectomy alone. However, the results on CHD and mortality related to hysterectomy should be interpreted cautiously because of the high level of heterogeneity and unstable subgroup analyses.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the association of hysterectomy with and without oophorectomy on cardiovascular disease and all-cause, cardiovascular or cancer mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yuge Chen,&nbsp;Fengjuan Li,&nbsp;Lei Liang,&nbsp;Huiling Hua,&nbsp;Shizheng Liu,&nbsp;Zihe Yu,&nbsp;Qiuyu Chen,&nbsp;Shufeng Huang,&nbsp;Pei Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.17843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The associations between hysterectomy and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality remains unlcear and a meta-analysis with cohort studies is lacking.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies to investigate the relationship between hysterectomy and CVD, coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, heart failure, and all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality. We further explored the effect of oophorectomy on the association between hysterectomy and these health outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Search strategy</h3>\\n \\n <p>PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched up to 24 July 2023.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Selection criteria</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cohort studies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data collection and analysis</h3>\\n \\n <p>Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. We used <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> to assess the heterogeneity between studies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Forty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis. Hysterectomy was significantly associated with an increased risk of CVD (pooled HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.09–1.13; <i>n</i> = 6; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0) and stroke (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04–1.14; <i>n</i> = 7; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 52%), but with a decreased risk of cancer mortality (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86–1.00; <i>n</i> = 4; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 81%). No significant association was observed between hysterectomy and CHD (<i>n</i> = 10; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 83%), all-cause mortality (<i>n</i> = 8; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 81%) or cardiovascular mortality (<i>n</i> = 7; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 89%). Hysterectomy with and without oophorectomy was significantly associated with CVD and stroke risk, but showed a larger effect size for hysterectomy with oophorectomy. A significantly increased risk of CHD was observed in the subgroup of hysterectomy with oophorectomy, but not for the subgroup of hysterectomy alone.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Hysterectomy may increase the risk of CVD, CHD and stroke, but not all-cause, cardiovascular or cancer mortality. Hysterectomy with oophorectomy may have a higher risk of CVD, CHD and stroke than hysterectomy alone. However, the results on CHD and mortality related to hysterectomy should be interpreted cautiously because of the high level of heterogeneity and unstable subgroup analyses.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17843\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17843","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:子宫切除术与心血管疾病(CVD)和死亡率之间的关系尚不明确,也缺乏队列研究的荟萃分析:本研究旨在对队列研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,探讨子宫切除术与心血管疾病、冠心病(CHD)、中风、心力衰竭以及全因、心血管疾病和癌症死亡率之间的关系。我们进一步探讨了输卵管切除术对子宫切除术与这些健康结果之间关系的影响:筛选标准:队列研究:数据收集与分析:使用随机效应模型对危险比(HRs)和 95% 置信区间(95% CIs)进行汇总。我们使用 I2 评估研究之间的异质性:荟萃分析纳入了 43 项研究。子宫切除术与心血管疾病(合并 HR 1.11,95% CI 1.09-1.13;n = 6;I2 = 0)和中风(HR 1.09,95% CI 1.04-1.14;n = 7;I2 = 52%)风险增加有显著相关性,但与癌症死亡风险降低(HR 0.93,95% CI 0.86-1.00;n = 4;I2 = 81%)有显著相关性。在子宫切除术与冠心病(n = 10;I2 = 83%)、全因死亡率(n = 8;I2 = 81%)或心血管死亡率(n = 7;I2 = 89%)之间未观察到明显关联。无论是否进行输卵管切除术,子宫切除术都与心血管疾病和中风风险显著相关,但进行输卵管切除术的子宫切除术的影响更大。在子宫切除并行输卵管切除术的亚组中,观察到罹患心血管疾病的风险明显增加,而在单纯子宫切除术的亚组中则没有观察到这种情况:结论:子宫切除术可能会增加心血管疾病、冠心病和中风的风险,但不会增加全因、心血管疾病或癌症的死亡率。与单纯子宫切除术相比,子宫切除术合并输卵管切除术可能会增加心血管疾病、冠心病和中风的风险。然而,由于存在高度异质性和不稳定的亚组分析,与子宫切除术相关的心血管疾病和死亡率结果应谨慎解读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining the association of hysterectomy with and without oophorectomy on cardiovascular disease and all-cause, cardiovascular or cancer mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The associations between hysterectomy and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality remains unlcear and a meta-analysis with cohort studies is lacking.

Objectives

This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies to investigate the relationship between hysterectomy and CVD, coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, heart failure, and all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality. We further explored the effect of oophorectomy on the association between hysterectomy and these health outcomes.

Search strategy

PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched up to 24 July 2023.

Selection criteria

Cohort studies.

Data collection and analysis

Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. We used I2 to assess the heterogeneity between studies.

Main results

Forty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis. Hysterectomy was significantly associated with an increased risk of CVD (pooled HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.09–1.13; n = 6; I2 = 0) and stroke (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04–1.14; n = 7; I2 = 52%), but with a decreased risk of cancer mortality (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86–1.00; n = 4; I2 = 81%). No significant association was observed between hysterectomy and CHD (n = 10; I2 = 83%), all-cause mortality (n = 8; I2 = 81%) or cardiovascular mortality (n = 7; I2 = 89%). Hysterectomy with and without oophorectomy was significantly associated with CVD and stroke risk, but showed a larger effect size for hysterectomy with oophorectomy. A significantly increased risk of CHD was observed in the subgroup of hysterectomy with oophorectomy, but not for the subgroup of hysterectomy alone.

Conclusions

Hysterectomy may increase the risk of CVD, CHD and stroke, but not all-cause, cardiovascular or cancer mortality. Hysterectomy with oophorectomy may have a higher risk of CVD, CHD and stroke than hysterectomy alone. However, the results on CHD and mortality related to hysterectomy should be interpreted cautiously because of the high level of heterogeneity and unstable subgroup analyses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Trustworthiness criteria for meta-analyses of randomized controlled studies: OBGYN journal guidelines. Recurrence of Severe Maternal Morbidity and Transfusion During Delivery Hospitalisations: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Pre-Pregnancy Chronic Conditions: Mental Health is a Burgeoning Problem. Prevention of Intrauterine Adhesions: The Way to Go. Role of Child Marriage and Adolescent Childbearing on Hysterectomy Among Married Women in India: A Cross-Sectional and Time-to-Event Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1