治疗的适当性:无症状颈动脉狭窄,包括经颈动脉血管重建术

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Seminars in Vascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2024.03.002
{"title":"治疗的适当性:无症状颈动脉狭窄,包括经颈动脉血管重建术","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Carotid artery stenosis is one of the most common diagnoses treated by vascular specialists in the United States. The optimal management of carotid stenosis remains controversial, however, with notable variation surrounding diagnostic imaging modalities, longitudinal surveillance, medical therapies, and procedural interventions. Data from high-quality </span>randomized controlled trials<span><span><span> and observational studies form the foundation for current management paradigms and societal guidelines that inform clinical practice. Presently, a diagnosis of carotid disease<span> is most often established with duplex ultrasound and supplemental cross-sectional imaging using computed tomography<span><span> or magnetic resonance angiography as needed to provide additional anatomic information. All patients with documented occlusive disease should receive goal-directed medical therapy with </span>antiplatelet agents and a lipid-reduction strategy, most commonly with a statin. Those with severe carotid stenosis and an acceptable life expectancy may be considered for </span></span></span>carotid artery<span> revascularization. The proceduralist should optimally consider a shared decision-making approach in which the tradeoffs of revascularization can be carefully considered with the patient to optimize informed therapeutic decision making. In current practice, three distinct procedure options exist to treat carotid artery stenosis, including </span></span>carotid endarterectomy<span>, transfemoral carotid artery stenting, and transcarotid artery revascularization. It should be noted that each procedure, although often used interchangeably in most clinical settings, carry technical nuances and outcome disparities. In this review, each of these topics are explored and various approaches are outlined surrounding the appropriate use of treatments for patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":51153,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Vascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appropriateness of care: Asymptomatic carotid stenosis including transcarotid artery revascularization\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2024.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Carotid artery stenosis is one of the most common diagnoses treated by vascular specialists in the United States. The optimal management of carotid stenosis remains controversial, however, with notable variation surrounding diagnostic imaging modalities, longitudinal surveillance, medical therapies, and procedural interventions. Data from high-quality </span>randomized controlled trials<span><span><span> and observational studies form the foundation for current management paradigms and societal guidelines that inform clinical practice. Presently, a diagnosis of carotid disease<span> is most often established with duplex ultrasound and supplemental cross-sectional imaging using computed tomography<span><span> or magnetic resonance angiography as needed to provide additional anatomic information. All patients with documented occlusive disease should receive goal-directed medical therapy with </span>antiplatelet agents and a lipid-reduction strategy, most commonly with a statin. Those with severe carotid stenosis and an acceptable life expectancy may be considered for </span></span></span>carotid artery<span> revascularization. The proceduralist should optimally consider a shared decision-making approach in which the tradeoffs of revascularization can be carefully considered with the patient to optimize informed therapeutic decision making. In current practice, three distinct procedure options exist to treat carotid artery stenosis, including </span></span>carotid endarterectomy<span>, transfemoral carotid artery stenting, and transcarotid artery revascularization. It should be noted that each procedure, although often used interchangeably in most clinical settings, carry technical nuances and outcome disparities. In this review, each of these topics are explored and various approaches are outlined surrounding the appropriate use of treatments for patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895796724000152\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895796724000152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颈动脉狭窄是美国血管专科医生最常见的诊断之一。然而,颈动脉狭窄的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议,围绕影像诊断模式、纵向监测、药物疗法和手术干预等方面存在显著差异。来自高质量随机对照试验和观察性研究的数据构成了当前管理模式和社会指南的基础,为临床实践提供了依据。目前,颈动脉疾病的诊断通常是通过双相超声波检查和必要时使用计算机断层扫描或磁共振血管造影术进行横断面补充成像,以提供更多解剖信息。所有有记录的闭塞性疾病患者都应接受目标明确的药物治疗,包括抗血小板药物和降脂策略,最常见的是他汀类药物。对于颈动脉严重狭窄且预期寿命尚可的患者,可考虑进行颈动脉血运重建。手术医师应充分考虑共同决策方法,与患者一起仔细考虑血管重建的利弊,以优化知情治疗决策。目前,治疗颈动脉狭窄有三种不同的手术方案,包括颈动脉内膜剥脱术、经口颈动脉支架植入术和经颈动脉血运重建术。需要注意的是,尽管在大多数临床环境中,每种手术都可以互换使用,但它们在技术上存在细微差别,治疗效果也不尽相同。在这篇综述中,我们将逐一探讨这些主题,并概述围绕无症状颈动脉狭窄患者适当使用治疗方法的各种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Appropriateness of care: Asymptomatic carotid stenosis including transcarotid artery revascularization

Carotid artery stenosis is one of the most common diagnoses treated by vascular specialists in the United States. The optimal management of carotid stenosis remains controversial, however, with notable variation surrounding diagnostic imaging modalities, longitudinal surveillance, medical therapies, and procedural interventions. Data from high-quality randomized controlled trials and observational studies form the foundation for current management paradigms and societal guidelines that inform clinical practice. Presently, a diagnosis of carotid disease is most often established with duplex ultrasound and supplemental cross-sectional imaging using computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography as needed to provide additional anatomic information. All patients with documented occlusive disease should receive goal-directed medical therapy with antiplatelet agents and a lipid-reduction strategy, most commonly with a statin. Those with severe carotid stenosis and an acceptable life expectancy may be considered for carotid artery revascularization. The proceduralist should optimally consider a shared decision-making approach in which the tradeoffs of revascularization can be carefully considered with the patient to optimize informed therapeutic decision making. In current practice, three distinct procedure options exist to treat carotid artery stenosis, including carotid endarterectomy, transfemoral carotid artery stenting, and transcarotid artery revascularization. It should be noted that each procedure, although often used interchangeably in most clinical settings, carry technical nuances and outcome disparities. In this review, each of these topics are explored and various approaches are outlined surrounding the appropriate use of treatments for patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Vascular Surgery examines the latest thinking on a particular clinical problem and features new diagnostic and operative techniques. The journal allows practitioners to expand their capabilities and to keep pace with the most rapidly evolving areas of surgery.
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive review of virtual assistants in vascular surgery Large language models and artificial intelligence chatbots in vascular surgery Extended and augmented reality in vascular surgery: Opportunities and challenges Digital twin and artificial intelligence technologies for predictive planning of endovascular procedures 3‐Dimensional printing in vascular disease: From manufacturer to clinical use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1