正念与心理资本:在为期多周的正念培训计划中从个人角度考察意向的作用

IF 3.3 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Personnel Review Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1108/pr-06-2023-0512
Ellen Choi, Nadège Levallet, Mehak Bharti
{"title":"正念与心理资本:在为期多周的正念培训计划中从个人角度考察意向的作用","authors":"Ellen Choi, Nadège Levallet, Mehak Bharti","doi":"10.1108/pr-06-2023-0512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>When evaluating the efficacy of mindfulness interventions, most studies take a linear approach to explore how an intervention impacts different outcomes for individuals, and rarely is the role of intention examined. This research takes a configural approach to consider how various elements of a participant’s training expectations and their experience in the training condition combine to predict increases in psychological capital.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Employees from hospital settings were randomized into three conditions (mindfulness training, active control (Pilates), and wait-list control group) and completed surveys at three time points (baseline, post-training and three months post-training). A qualitative comparative analysis was applied to see what combinations of motivational elements were associated with increases in psychological capital.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>We find that all three conditions can boost their psychological capital based on different configurations involving efficacy beliefs, baseline states of well-being (psychological capital and perceived stress) and changes in levels of mindfulness and perceived stress.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>Individual characteristics, like motivation, expectancy and baseline needs, are an important consideration in addition to the training condition itself when determining whether a training is efficacious.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>It is of increasing importance that organizations find ways to support employee well-being. Offering a variety of psychological and physical interventions can improve psychological capital. Applying needs assessments that clarify the desires, needs and expectations employees hold may help with intervention efficacy.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The current study offers an innovative methodology through which realist evaluation approaches can consider multiple factors to predict outcomes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48148,"journal":{"name":"Personnel Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mindfulness and psychological capital: examining the role of intention from the person perspective in a multi-week mindfulness training program\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Choi, Nadège Levallet, Mehak Bharti\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/pr-06-2023-0512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>When evaluating the efficacy of mindfulness interventions, most studies take a linear approach to explore how an intervention impacts different outcomes for individuals, and rarely is the role of intention examined. This research takes a configural approach to consider how various elements of a participant’s training expectations and their experience in the training condition combine to predict increases in psychological capital.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Employees from hospital settings were randomized into three conditions (mindfulness training, active control (Pilates), and wait-list control group) and completed surveys at three time points (baseline, post-training and three months post-training). A qualitative comparative analysis was applied to see what combinations of motivational elements were associated with increases in psychological capital.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>We find that all three conditions can boost their psychological capital based on different configurations involving efficacy beliefs, baseline states of well-being (psychological capital and perceived stress) and changes in levels of mindfulness and perceived stress.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>Individual characteristics, like motivation, expectancy and baseline needs, are an important consideration in addition to the training condition itself when determining whether a training is efficacious.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>It is of increasing importance that organizations find ways to support employee well-being. Offering a variety of psychological and physical interventions can improve psychological capital. Applying needs assessments that clarify the desires, needs and expectations employees hold may help with intervention efficacy.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The current study offers an innovative methodology through which realist evaluation approaches can consider multiple factors to predict outcomes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":48148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personnel Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personnel Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-06-2023-0512\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personnel Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-06-2023-0512","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在评估正念干预的效果时,大多数研究都采用线性方法来探讨干预如何影响个人的不同结果,而很少研究意向的作用。本研究采用了一种配置方法,以考虑参与者的培训期望和他们在培训条件下的经历等各种因素如何共同预测心理资本的增加。设计/方法/途径将医院员工随机分为三个条件组(正念培训组、积极对照组(普拉提)和等待对照组),并在三个时间点(基线、培训后和培训后三个月)完成调查。研究结果我们发现,基于功效信念、幸福基线状态(心理资本和感知压力)以及正念水平和感知压力变化的不同配置,所有三种情况都能提高心理资本。研究局限性/启示在确定一项培训是否有效时,除了培训条件本身之外,个人特征(如动机、期望和基线需求)也是一个重要的考虑因素。提供各种心理和生理干预措施可以改善心理资本。本研究提供了一种创新方法,通过这种方法,现实主义评估方法可以考虑多种因素来预测结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mindfulness and psychological capital: examining the role of intention from the person perspective in a multi-week mindfulness training program

Purpose

When evaluating the efficacy of mindfulness interventions, most studies take a linear approach to explore how an intervention impacts different outcomes for individuals, and rarely is the role of intention examined. This research takes a configural approach to consider how various elements of a participant’s training expectations and their experience in the training condition combine to predict increases in psychological capital.

Design/methodology/approach

Employees from hospital settings were randomized into three conditions (mindfulness training, active control (Pilates), and wait-list control group) and completed surveys at three time points (baseline, post-training and three months post-training). A qualitative comparative analysis was applied to see what combinations of motivational elements were associated with increases in psychological capital.

Findings

We find that all three conditions can boost their psychological capital based on different configurations involving efficacy beliefs, baseline states of well-being (psychological capital and perceived stress) and changes in levels of mindfulness and perceived stress.

Research limitations/implications

Individual characteristics, like motivation, expectancy and baseline needs, are an important consideration in addition to the training condition itself when determining whether a training is efficacious.

Practical implications

It is of increasing importance that organizations find ways to support employee well-being. Offering a variety of psychological and physical interventions can improve psychological capital. Applying needs assessments that clarify the desires, needs and expectations employees hold may help with intervention efficacy.

Originality/value

The current study offers an innovative methodology through which realist evaluation approaches can consider multiple factors to predict outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Personnel Review
Personnel Review Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Personnel Review (PR) publishes rigorous, well written articles from a range of theoretical and methodological traditions. We value articles that have high originality and that engage with contemporary challenges to human resource management theory, policy and practice development. Research that highlights innovation and emerging issues in the field, and the medium- to long-term impact of HRM policy and practice, is especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Mentoring global talent: an integrative review Fighting fear: the buffering of well-being-HRM on the effects of nurses’ fear of COVID-19 on job stress and patient care A temporal evolution of human resource management and technology research: a retrospective bibliometric analysis Effects of performance appraisal on employees’ extra-role behaviors and turnover intentions – A parallel mediation model Artificial intelligence-based virtual assistant and employee engagement: an empirical investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1