论 AIOps 解决方案中监督学习的模型更新策略

IF 6.6 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1145/3664599
Yingzhe Lyu, Heng Li, Zhen Ming (Jack) Jiang, Ahmed Hassan
{"title":"论 AIOps 解决方案中监督学习的模型更新策略","authors":"Yingzhe Lyu, Heng Li, Zhen Ming (Jack) Jiang, Ahmed Hassan","doi":"10.1145/3664599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>AIOps (Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations) solutions leverage the massive data produced during the operation of large-scale systems and machine learning models to assist software engineers in their system operations. As operation data produced in the field are constantly evolving due to factors such as the changing operational environment and user base, the models in AIOps solutions need to be constantly maintained after deployment. While prior works focus on innovative modeling techniques to improve the performance of AIOps models before releasing them into the field, when and how to update AIOps models remain an under-investigated topic. In this work, we performed a case study on three large-scale public operation data: two trace datasets from the cloud computing platforms of Google and Alibaba and one disk stats dataset from the BackBlaze cloud storage data center. We empirically assessed five different types of model update strategies for supervised learning regarding their performance, updating cost, and stability. We observed that active model update strategies (e.g., periodical retraining, concept drift guided retraining, time-based model ensembles, and online learning) achieve better and more stable performance than a stationary model. Particularly, applying sophisticated model update strategies (e.g., concept drift detection, time-based ensembles, and online learning) could provide better performance, efficiency, and stability than simply retraining AIOps models periodically. In addition, we observed that, although some update strategies (e.g., time-based ensemble and online learning) can save model training time, they significantly sacrifice model testing time, which could hinder their applications in AIOps solutions where the operation data arrive at high pace and volume and where immediate inferences are required. Our findings highlight that practitioners should consider the evolution of operation data and actively maintain AIOps models over time. Our observations can also guide researchers and practitioners in investigating more efficient and effective model update strategies that fit in the context of AIOps.</p>","PeriodicalId":50933,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Model Update Strategies for Supervised Learning in AIOps Solutions\",\"authors\":\"Yingzhe Lyu, Heng Li, Zhen Ming (Jack) Jiang, Ahmed Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3664599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>AIOps (Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations) solutions leverage the massive data produced during the operation of large-scale systems and machine learning models to assist software engineers in their system operations. As operation data produced in the field are constantly evolving due to factors such as the changing operational environment and user base, the models in AIOps solutions need to be constantly maintained after deployment. While prior works focus on innovative modeling techniques to improve the performance of AIOps models before releasing them into the field, when and how to update AIOps models remain an under-investigated topic. In this work, we performed a case study on three large-scale public operation data: two trace datasets from the cloud computing platforms of Google and Alibaba and one disk stats dataset from the BackBlaze cloud storage data center. We empirically assessed five different types of model update strategies for supervised learning regarding their performance, updating cost, and stability. We observed that active model update strategies (e.g., periodical retraining, concept drift guided retraining, time-based model ensembles, and online learning) achieve better and more stable performance than a stationary model. Particularly, applying sophisticated model update strategies (e.g., concept drift detection, time-based ensembles, and online learning) could provide better performance, efficiency, and stability than simply retraining AIOps models periodically. In addition, we observed that, although some update strategies (e.g., time-based ensemble and online learning) can save model training time, they significantly sacrifice model testing time, which could hinder their applications in AIOps solutions where the operation data arrive at high pace and volume and where immediate inferences are required. Our findings highlight that practitioners should consider the evolution of operation data and actively maintain AIOps models over time. Our observations can also guide researchers and practitioners in investigating more efficient and effective model update strategies that fit in the context of AIOps.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3664599\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3664599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

AIOps (IT 运营人工智能)解决方案利用大型系统运行过程中产生的海量数据和机器学习模型来协助软件工程师进行系统运营。由于现场产生的操作数据会因操作环境和用户群的变化等因素而不断变化,因此 AIOps 解决方案中的模型在部署后需要不断维护。之前的工作主要集中在创新建模技术上,以便在将 AIOps 模型发布到现场之前提高其性能,而何时以及如何更新 AIOps 模型仍是一个未得到充分研究的课题。在这项工作中,我们对三个大规模公共运行数据进行了案例研究:两个来自谷歌和阿里巴巴云计算平台的跟踪数据集和一个来自 BackBlaze 云存储数据中心的磁盘统计数据集。我们对五种不同类型的监督学习模型更新策略的性能、更新成本和稳定性进行了实证评估。我们发现,主动模型更新策略(如周期性再训练、概念漂移引导再训练、基于时间的模型集合和在线学习)比静态模型的性能更好、更稳定。特别是,应用复杂的模型更新策略(如概念漂移检测、基于时间的模型集合和在线学习)可以提供比简单地定期重新训练 AIOps 模型更好的性能、效率和稳定性。此外,我们还注意到,虽然某些更新策略(如基于时间的集合和在线学习)可以节省模型训练时间,但它们却大大牺牲了模型测试时间,这可能会妨碍它们在操作数据到达速度快、数量大且需要立即推断的 AIOps 解决方案中的应用。我们的研究结果突出表明,从业人员应考虑运营数据的演变,并随着时间的推移积极维护 AIOps 模型。我们的观察结果还能指导研究人员和从业人员研究更高效、更有效的模型更新策略,以适应 AIOps 的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Model Update Strategies for Supervised Learning in AIOps Solutions

AIOps (Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations) solutions leverage the massive data produced during the operation of large-scale systems and machine learning models to assist software engineers in their system operations. As operation data produced in the field are constantly evolving due to factors such as the changing operational environment and user base, the models in AIOps solutions need to be constantly maintained after deployment. While prior works focus on innovative modeling techniques to improve the performance of AIOps models before releasing them into the field, when and how to update AIOps models remain an under-investigated topic. In this work, we performed a case study on three large-scale public operation data: two trace datasets from the cloud computing platforms of Google and Alibaba and one disk stats dataset from the BackBlaze cloud storage data center. We empirically assessed five different types of model update strategies for supervised learning regarding their performance, updating cost, and stability. We observed that active model update strategies (e.g., periodical retraining, concept drift guided retraining, time-based model ensembles, and online learning) achieve better and more stable performance than a stationary model. Particularly, applying sophisticated model update strategies (e.g., concept drift detection, time-based ensembles, and online learning) could provide better performance, efficiency, and stability than simply retraining AIOps models periodically. In addition, we observed that, although some update strategies (e.g., time-based ensemble and online learning) can save model training time, they significantly sacrifice model testing time, which could hinder their applications in AIOps solutions where the operation data arrive at high pace and volume and where immediate inferences are required. Our findings highlight that practitioners should consider the evolution of operation data and actively maintain AIOps models over time. Our observations can also guide researchers and practitioners in investigating more efficient and effective model update strategies that fit in the context of AIOps.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
164
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Designing and building a large, complex software system is a tremendous challenge. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) publishes papers on all aspects of that challenge: specification, design, development and maintenance. It covers tools and methodologies, languages, data structures, and algorithms. TOSEM also reports on successful efforts, noting practical lessons that can be scaled and transferred to other projects, and often looks at applications of innovative technologies. The tone is scholarly but readable; the content is worthy of study; the presentation is effective.
期刊最新文献
Effective, Platform-Independent GUI Testing via Image Embedding and Reinforcement Learning Bitmap-Based Security Monitoring for Deeply Embedded Systems Harmonising Contributions: Exploring Diversity in Software Engineering through CQA Mining on Stack Overflow An Empirical Study on the Characteristics of Database Access Bugs in Java Applications Self-planning Code Generation with Large Language Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1