加拿大的沼泽兰花:部分解开长期未解之谜

IF 0.9 4区 生物学 Q4 PLANT SCIENCES Kew Bulletin Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1007/s12225-024-10176-6
Richard M. Bateman, Susan J. Meades, Ian Denholm, Daniel Tyteca, Mikael Hedrén
{"title":"加拿大的沼泽兰花:部分解开长期未解之谜","authors":"Richard M. Bateman, Susan J. Meades, Ian Denholm, Daniel Tyteca, Mikael Hedrén","doi":"10.1007/s12225-024-10176-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Between 1959 and 1988, three populations of purple-flowered terrestrial orchids attributable to <i>Dactylorhiza</i> subgenus <i>Dactylorhiza</i> were discovered in Canada. The populations at Timmins, Ontario, and St John's, Newfoundland were strongly marked on both flowers and leaves, in contrast with the anthocyanin-deficient population at Tilt Cove, Newfoundland. All three populations have since experienced a wide range of taxonomic assignments; debates are also ongoing regarding their origin and most appropriate conservation status. Here, we address these questions by combining detailed in situ morphometric analyses based on 52 characters with allozyme profiles and data from nrITS, 15 plastid microsatellites and seven nuclear microsatellites. The allozyme data alone are sufficient to both confirm allopolyploidy and categorically refute past assignments of these populations to <i>D. incarnata</i>, <i>D. maculata</i>, <i>D. fuchsii</i>, <i>D. majalis</i> or <i>D. purpurella</i>. Several morphometric characters, nuclear microsatellites and nrITS all reliably distinguish each of the three study populations, whereas the two sampled subpopulations from St John's proved near-identical morphologically. In contrast, morphological variation within each of the three populations is strikingly low, particularly in characters other than those influenced by plant vigour. Similarly, compared with 14 European populations, the three Canadian populations proved genetically impoverished (two were near-invariant) and likely experienced recent, extreme genetic bottlenecks during establishment. The three populations differ substantially, both morphologically and molecularly, therefore probably representing independent immigration events. Although clearly attributable to <i>D. praetermissa</i>, all three populations deviate significantly in morphology and DNA data from comparable populations sampled across Europe, preventing identification of their precise geographic origins. Any attempt to determine their mode or origin — through natural long-distance transport, or accidental or deliberate introduction by humans – is challenged to explain why three lineages of a single European Marsh-orchid species, each in different ways atypical of that species, arrived independently in North America whereas no other European dactylorchid species has become established there.</p>","PeriodicalId":51321,"journal":{"name":"Kew Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marsh-orchids of Canada: long-standing mysteries partially solved\",\"authors\":\"Richard M. Bateman, Susan J. Meades, Ian Denholm, Daniel Tyteca, Mikael Hedrén\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12225-024-10176-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Between 1959 and 1988, three populations of purple-flowered terrestrial orchids attributable to <i>Dactylorhiza</i> subgenus <i>Dactylorhiza</i> were discovered in Canada. The populations at Timmins, Ontario, and St John's, Newfoundland were strongly marked on both flowers and leaves, in contrast with the anthocyanin-deficient population at Tilt Cove, Newfoundland. All three populations have since experienced a wide range of taxonomic assignments; debates are also ongoing regarding their origin and most appropriate conservation status. Here, we address these questions by combining detailed in situ morphometric analyses based on 52 characters with allozyme profiles and data from nrITS, 15 plastid microsatellites and seven nuclear microsatellites. The allozyme data alone are sufficient to both confirm allopolyploidy and categorically refute past assignments of these populations to <i>D. incarnata</i>, <i>D. maculata</i>, <i>D. fuchsii</i>, <i>D. majalis</i> or <i>D. purpurella</i>. Several morphometric characters, nuclear microsatellites and nrITS all reliably distinguish each of the three study populations, whereas the two sampled subpopulations from St John's proved near-identical morphologically. In contrast, morphological variation within each of the three populations is strikingly low, particularly in characters other than those influenced by plant vigour. Similarly, compared with 14 European populations, the three Canadian populations proved genetically impoverished (two were near-invariant) and likely experienced recent, extreme genetic bottlenecks during establishment. The three populations differ substantially, both morphologically and molecularly, therefore probably representing independent immigration events. Although clearly attributable to <i>D. praetermissa</i>, all three populations deviate significantly in morphology and DNA data from comparable populations sampled across Europe, preventing identification of their precise geographic origins. Any attempt to determine their mode or origin — through natural long-distance transport, or accidental or deliberate introduction by humans – is challenged to explain why three lineages of a single European Marsh-orchid species, each in different ways atypical of that species, arrived independently in North America whereas no other European dactylorchid species has become established there.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kew Bulletin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kew Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-024-10176-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kew Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-024-10176-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1959 年至 1988 年间,加拿大发现了三个紫花陆生兰属 Dactylorhiza 亚属的种群。安大略省蒂明斯和纽芬兰省圣约翰的种群在花朵和叶片上都有强烈的花青素标记,与之形成鲜明对比的是纽芬兰省蒂尔特湾的种群缺乏花青素。此后,这三个种群在分类学上经历了广泛的划分;关于它们的起源和最合适的保护地位的争论也一直在进行。在这里,我们将基于 52 个特征的详细原位形态计量分析与同工酶图谱以及 nrITS、15 个质粒微卫星和 7 个核微卫星的数据相结合,解决了这些问题。仅同工酶数据就足以确认异源多倍体,并断然驳斥过去将这些种群归入 D. incarnata、D. maculata、D. fuchsii、D. majalis 或 D. purpurella 的说法。几个形态特征、核微卫星和 nrITS 都能可靠地区分三个研究种群,而圣约翰的两个取样亚种群在形态上几乎相同。相比之下,这三个种群内部的形态差异非常小,尤其是受植物活力影响以外的特征。同样,与 14 个欧洲种群相比,三个加拿大种群的基因贫乏(其中两个种群近乎无变异),在建立过程中很可能经历了近期的极端基因瓶颈。这三个种群在形态和分子上都有很大差异,因此很可能是独立的移民事件。虽然这三个种群明显属于D. praetermissa,但它们的形态和DNA数据都与在欧洲采样的同类种群有很大差异,因此无法确定它们的确切地理起源。任何试图确定它们的起源方式(自然长途运输、意外或人类故意引入)的尝试都难以解释为什么一个欧洲沼泽兰物种的三个品系以不同的方式非典型地独立到达北美,而其他欧洲双齿兰物种却没有在北美定居。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Marsh-orchids of Canada: long-standing mysteries partially solved

Between 1959 and 1988, three populations of purple-flowered terrestrial orchids attributable to Dactylorhiza subgenus Dactylorhiza were discovered in Canada. The populations at Timmins, Ontario, and St John's, Newfoundland were strongly marked on both flowers and leaves, in contrast with the anthocyanin-deficient population at Tilt Cove, Newfoundland. All three populations have since experienced a wide range of taxonomic assignments; debates are also ongoing regarding their origin and most appropriate conservation status. Here, we address these questions by combining detailed in situ morphometric analyses based on 52 characters with allozyme profiles and data from nrITS, 15 plastid microsatellites and seven nuclear microsatellites. The allozyme data alone are sufficient to both confirm allopolyploidy and categorically refute past assignments of these populations to D. incarnata, D. maculata, D. fuchsii, D. majalis or D. purpurella. Several morphometric characters, nuclear microsatellites and nrITS all reliably distinguish each of the three study populations, whereas the two sampled subpopulations from St John's proved near-identical morphologically. In contrast, morphological variation within each of the three populations is strikingly low, particularly in characters other than those influenced by plant vigour. Similarly, compared with 14 European populations, the three Canadian populations proved genetically impoverished (two were near-invariant) and likely experienced recent, extreme genetic bottlenecks during establishment. The three populations differ substantially, both morphologically and molecularly, therefore probably representing independent immigration events. Although clearly attributable to D. praetermissa, all three populations deviate significantly in morphology and DNA data from comparable populations sampled across Europe, preventing identification of their precise geographic origins. Any attempt to determine their mode or origin — through natural long-distance transport, or accidental or deliberate introduction by humans – is challenged to explain why three lineages of a single European Marsh-orchid species, each in different ways atypical of that species, arrived independently in North America whereas no other European dactylorchid species has become established there.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kew Bulletin
Kew Bulletin PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Kew Bulletin is an international peer-reviewed journal for the taxonomy, systematics and conservation of vascular plants and fungi. Papers on conservation, evolution, palynology, cytology, anatomy, biogeography and phytochemistry are considered, where relevant to taxonomy and systematics. Review papers on topics appropriate to the journal are invited. The journal is richly illustrated with line drawings and photographs, and also features a Book Review and Notices section. Four parts (c. 640 pp) are published each year.
期刊最新文献
Securidaca aurea (Polygalaceae, Polygaleae), a new species from the Brazilian Amazon Peperomia dryadica (Piperaceae), a new karstic species from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest Afrothismia ugandensis nom. nov. (Afrothismiaceae), Critically Endangered and endemic to Budongo Central Forest Reserve, Uganda The genus Hypobathrum (Rubiaceae) in Thailand Cyclamen brulloi (Primulaceae), a new species from Sicily (Italy)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1