比较研究:阿曼和菲律宾多方教育利益相关者对残疾儿童和特殊教育目标的看法

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Comparative Education and Development Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1108/ijced-09-2023-0087
Young Ah Lee, Marian Patricia Bea Francisco, Shariffa Khalid Qais Al-Said, Muna Yousuf Abdullah Al Bulushi, Ye Wang
{"title":"比较研究:阿曼和菲律宾多方教育利益相关者对残疾儿童和特殊教育目标的看法","authors":"Young Ah Lee, Marian Patricia Bea Francisco, Shariffa Khalid Qais Al-Said, Muna Yousuf Abdullah Al Bulushi, Ye Wang","doi":"10.1108/ijced-09-2023-0087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This comparative study explored the perceptions of educational stakeholders in Oman and the Philippines concerning children with disabilities and the goals of special education. Stakeholders' perspectives can influence their professional behaviours and attitudes, which, in turn, can profoundly impact children with disabilities who already face numerous challenges. Hence, comprehending the viewpoints of these stakeholders is vital for fostering socially just education for individuals with disabilities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study employed a qualitative comparative case study approach with a horizontal comparison strategy, and both convenience and purposeful sampling techniques were used for participant selection. The study involved 53 participants from both countries, including policymakers, teacher educators, in-service teachers and student teachers from general and special education domains. Data were gathered through individual interviews and themes were subsequently discerned via data analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Despite the different cultural and historical contexts and distinct roles of stakeholders in both countries, the results indicate more parallels than disparities in their perceptions. The primary congruence underscored in this research was imperative to critically assess the language and ideology surrounding the goals of special education, such as mainstreaming and normalisation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Although numerous studies have probed the perceptions of various educational stakeholders concerning children with disabilities and educational goals, there is limited research that encompasses the perspectives of the seven distinct stakeholder groups. The consistency of language usage across both countries and among all stakeholders underscores the need for a rigorous cross-country examination involving all educational participants.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study: perceptions of multiple education stakeholders on children with disabilities and goals of special education in Oman and the Philippines\",\"authors\":\"Young Ah Lee, Marian Patricia Bea Francisco, Shariffa Khalid Qais Al-Said, Muna Yousuf Abdullah Al Bulushi, Ye Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijced-09-2023-0087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This comparative study explored the perceptions of educational stakeholders in Oman and the Philippines concerning children with disabilities and the goals of special education. Stakeholders' perspectives can influence their professional behaviours and attitudes, which, in turn, can profoundly impact children with disabilities who already face numerous challenges. Hence, comprehending the viewpoints of these stakeholders is vital for fostering socially just education for individuals with disabilities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This study employed a qualitative comparative case study approach with a horizontal comparison strategy, and both convenience and purposeful sampling techniques were used for participant selection. The study involved 53 participants from both countries, including policymakers, teacher educators, in-service teachers and student teachers from general and special education domains. Data were gathered through individual interviews and themes were subsequently discerned via data analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Despite the different cultural and historical contexts and distinct roles of stakeholders in both countries, the results indicate more parallels than disparities in their perceptions. The primary congruence underscored in this research was imperative to critically assess the language and ideology surrounding the goals of special education, such as mainstreaming and normalisation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>Although numerous studies have probed the perceptions of various educational stakeholders concerning children with disabilities and educational goals, there is limited research that encompasses the perspectives of the seven distinct stakeholder groups. The consistency of language usage across both countries and among all stakeholders underscores the need for a rigorous cross-country examination involving all educational participants.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":51967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijced-09-2023-0087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijced-09-2023-0087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本比较研究探讨了阿曼和菲律宾教育利益相关者对残疾儿童和特殊教育目标的看法。利益相关者的观点会影响他们的职业行为和态度,进而对已经面临诸多挑战的残疾儿童产生深远影响。因此,了解这些利益相关者的观点对于促进残疾人的社会公正教育至关重要。本研究采用了横向比较策略的定性比较案例研究方法,并使用了方便抽样和有目的抽样两种技术来选择参与者。研究涉及两国的 53 名参与者,包括普通教育和特殊教育领域的政策制定者、师范教育工作者、在职教师和学生教师。研究结果尽管两国的文化和历史背景不同,利益相关者的角色也各不相同,但研究结果表明,两国利益相关者的看法相似之处多于差异。本研究中强调的主要一致性对于批判性地评估围绕特殊教育目标(如主流化和正常化)的语言和意识形态至关重要。 原创性/价值虽然已有许多研究探讨了不同教育利益相关者对残疾儿童和教育目标的看法,但涵盖七个不同利益相关者群体观点的研究却十分有限。两个国家和所有利益相关者在语言使用上的一致性突出表明,有必要对所有教育参与者进行严格的跨国审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study: perceptions of multiple education stakeholders on children with disabilities and goals of special education in Oman and the Philippines

Purpose

This comparative study explored the perceptions of educational stakeholders in Oman and the Philippines concerning children with disabilities and the goals of special education. Stakeholders' perspectives can influence their professional behaviours and attitudes, which, in turn, can profoundly impact children with disabilities who already face numerous challenges. Hence, comprehending the viewpoints of these stakeholders is vital for fostering socially just education for individuals with disabilities.

Design/methodology/approach

This study employed a qualitative comparative case study approach with a horizontal comparison strategy, and both convenience and purposeful sampling techniques were used for participant selection. The study involved 53 participants from both countries, including policymakers, teacher educators, in-service teachers and student teachers from general and special education domains. Data were gathered through individual interviews and themes were subsequently discerned via data analysis.

Findings

Despite the different cultural and historical contexts and distinct roles of stakeholders in both countries, the results indicate more parallels than disparities in their perceptions. The primary congruence underscored in this research was imperative to critically assess the language and ideology surrounding the goals of special education, such as mainstreaming and normalisation.

Originality/value

Although numerous studies have probed the perceptions of various educational stakeholders concerning children with disabilities and educational goals, there is limited research that encompasses the perspectives of the seven distinct stakeholder groups. The consistency of language usage across both countries and among all stakeholders underscores the need for a rigorous cross-country examination involving all educational participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
A critical evaluation of the validity of socioeconomic measures used in PISA Envisioning quality education for sustainability transformation in teacher education: perspectives from an international dialogue on Sustainable Development Goal 4 Analysing the dropout patterns of individual children in Nepal: relationship between school dropout and grade repetition/entrance age Vedic mathematics for sustainable knowledge: a systematic literature review Education for sustainability as a way-out to nurture citizens: a reframing in policy practices of Chinese higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1