劳动力市场的兴趣差距:人们的职业兴趣与国家工作需求的比较

IF 3.7 2区 心理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Business and Psychology Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1007/s10869-024-09945-8
Kevin A. Hoff, Kenneth E. Granillo-Velasquez, Alexis Hanna, Michael L. Morris, Frederick L. Oswald, James Rounds
{"title":"劳动力市场的兴趣差距:人们的职业兴趣与国家工作需求的比较","authors":"Kevin A. Hoff, Kenneth E. Granillo-Velasquez, Alexis Hanna, Michael L. Morris, Frederick L. Oswald, James Rounds","doi":"10.1007/s10869-024-09945-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Vocational interest assessments are widely used to determine which jobs might be a good fit for people. However, showing a good fit to particular jobs does not necessarily mean that those jobs are available. In this respect, little is known about the alignment between people’s vocational interests and national labor demands. The current study used a national dataset comprising 1.21 million United States residents to investigate this issue empirically. Results revealed three major findings. First, around two-thirds of people were most interested in people-oriented jobs (i.e., artistic, social, or enterprising interests), with the remaining one-third being most interested in things-oriented jobs (i.e., realistic, investigative, or conventional interests). Second, the distribution of people’s interests did not align with U.S. job demands in 2014, 2019, and 2029 (projections), revealing large gaps between interest supply and demand. Notably, the most popular interest among people (artistic) was the least demanded among jobs, whereas the least popular interest among people (conventional) was highly demanded among jobs. Third, interest gaps were generally larger at lower education levels, indicating that higher education can provide more opportunities to achieve interest fit at work. We integrate these findings to discuss implications for individuals, organizations, and career guidance practitioners aimed at better coordinating people’s interests with available jobs to promote individual career success and national workforce readiness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Psychology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interest Gaps in the Labor Market: Comparing People’s Vocational Interests with National Job Demands\",\"authors\":\"Kevin A. Hoff, Kenneth E. Granillo-Velasquez, Alexis Hanna, Michael L. Morris, Frederick L. Oswald, James Rounds\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10869-024-09945-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Vocational interest assessments are widely used to determine which jobs might be a good fit for people. However, showing a good fit to particular jobs does not necessarily mean that those jobs are available. In this respect, little is known about the alignment between people’s vocational interests and national labor demands. The current study used a national dataset comprising 1.21 million United States residents to investigate this issue empirically. Results revealed three major findings. First, around two-thirds of people were most interested in people-oriented jobs (i.e., artistic, social, or enterprising interests), with the remaining one-third being most interested in things-oriented jobs (i.e., realistic, investigative, or conventional interests). Second, the distribution of people’s interests did not align with U.S. job demands in 2014, 2019, and 2029 (projections), revealing large gaps between interest supply and demand. Notably, the most popular interest among people (artistic) was the least demanded among jobs, whereas the least popular interest among people (conventional) was highly demanded among jobs. Third, interest gaps were generally larger at lower education levels, indicating that higher education can provide more opportunities to achieve interest fit at work. We integrate these findings to discuss implications for individuals, organizations, and career guidance practitioners aimed at better coordinating people’s interests with available jobs to promote individual career success and national workforce readiness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business and Psychology\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business and Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09945-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09945-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

职业兴趣评估被广泛用于确定哪些工作可能适合人们。然而,显示出与特定工作的良好契合并不一定意味着这些工作是可用的。在这方面,人们对职业兴趣与国家劳动力需求之间的一致性知之甚少。本研究使用了一个由 121 万美国居民组成的全国数据集,对这一问题进行了实证调查。结果显示了三大发现。首先,约三分之二的人对以人为本的工作(即艺术、社交或进取兴趣)最感兴趣,其余三分之一的人对以事为本的工作(即现实、调查或传统兴趣)最感兴趣。其次,人们的兴趣分布与 2014 年、2019 年和 2029 年美国的工作需求(预测值)不一致,显示出兴趣供需之间的巨大差距。值得注意的是,最受人们欢迎的兴趣(艺术)在工作岗位中的需求量最小,而最不受人们欢迎的兴趣(传统)在工作岗位中的需求量却很大。第三,教育程度越低,兴趣差距越大,这表明高等教育可以提供更多的机会来实现工作中的兴趣匹配。我们综合这些发现,讨论了对个人、组织和职业指导从业者的启示,旨在更好地协调人们的兴趣与现有工作,促进个人职业成功和国家劳动力准备就绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interest Gaps in the Labor Market: Comparing People’s Vocational Interests with National Job Demands

Vocational interest assessments are widely used to determine which jobs might be a good fit for people. However, showing a good fit to particular jobs does not necessarily mean that those jobs are available. In this respect, little is known about the alignment between people’s vocational interests and national labor demands. The current study used a national dataset comprising 1.21 million United States residents to investigate this issue empirically. Results revealed three major findings. First, around two-thirds of people were most interested in people-oriented jobs (i.e., artistic, social, or enterprising interests), with the remaining one-third being most interested in things-oriented jobs (i.e., realistic, investigative, or conventional interests). Second, the distribution of people’s interests did not align with U.S. job demands in 2014, 2019, and 2029 (projections), revealing large gaps between interest supply and demand. Notably, the most popular interest among people (artistic) was the least demanded among jobs, whereas the least popular interest among people (conventional) was highly demanded among jobs. Third, interest gaps were generally larger at lower education levels, indicating that higher education can provide more opportunities to achieve interest fit at work. We integrate these findings to discuss implications for individuals, organizations, and career guidance practitioners aimed at better coordinating people’s interests with available jobs to promote individual career success and national workforce readiness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business and Psychology (JBP) is an international outlet publishing high quality research designed to advance organizational science and practice. Since its inception in 1986, the journal has published impactful scholarship in Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Organizational Behavior, Human Resources Management, Work Psychology, Occupational Psychology, and Vocational Psychology. Typical subject matters include Team processes and effectiveness Customer service and satisfaction Employee recruitment, selection, and promotion Employee engagement and withdrawal Organizational culture and climate Training, development and coaching Mentoring and socialization Performance management, appraisal and feedback Workplace diversity Leadership Workplace health, stress, and safety Employee attitudes and satisfaction Careers and retirement Organizational communication Technology and work Employee motivation and job design Organizational change and development Employee citizenship and deviance Organizational effectiveness Work-nonwork/work-family Rigorous quantitative, qualitative, field-based, and lab-based empirical studies are welcome. Interdisciplinary scholarship is valued and encouraged. Submitted manuscripts should be well-grounded conceptually and make meaningful contributions to scientific understandingsand/or the advancement of science-based practice. The Journal of Business and Psychology is - A high quality/impactful outlet for organizational science research - A journal dedicated to bridging the science/practice divide - A journal striving to create interdisciplinary connections For details on submitting manuscripts, please read the author guidelines found in the far right menu.
期刊最新文献
Servant Leadership and Cooperation: The Moderating Role of Leader Group Prototypicality Here’s Looking at You: Does Eye Contact in Video Interviews Affect How Applicants are Perceived and Evaluated? Parent–Adolescent Transmission of Emotional Exhaustion: Testing a Social-Cognitive Spillover and Crossover Model The More Contextualized, the More Valid: Effects of Contextualization Strategies on Forced-choice Measurement The Relationship Between Team Diversity and Team Performance: Reconciling Promise and Reality Through a Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Registered Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1