巴氯芬的倒退:强调在菲尼布特戒断期使用巴氯芬的担忧。

Ryan Feldman PharmD
{"title":"巴氯芬的倒退:强调在菲尼布特戒断期使用巴氯芬的担忧。","authors":"Ryan Feldman PharmD","doi":"10.1002/jcph.2463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To the Editor:</p><p>I applaud Drs. Penzak and Bulloch for attempting to organize the sparse phenibut literature into usable clinical information.<span><sup>1</sup></span> However, some case information reported within this article requires correction. Additionally, important considerations for baclofen use in withdrawal need to be emphasized.</p><p>In the authors' discussion of baclofen use for withdrawal, they state: “This approach has been questioned, especially in patients who may be at risk of seizures. Fortunately, there were no reported seizures in any of the published cases after baclofen initiation.”</p><p>This statement is incorrect. It cites a case report, published by our author group, in which a patient has a seizure after being sent home on baclofen for phenibut withdrawal.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Later in the discussion, they do accurately describe our case report, contradicting their own statement.</p><p>Next, in the authors' discussion of pharmacotherapy for withdrawal management they comment in table 1 that baclofen “Has been used successfully alone and in combination (usually with a benzodiazepine) for the treatment of phenibut withdrawal.” However, withdrawal management entails various strategies. Some patients may taper from phenibut, while others will undergo abstinence, the two may require different treatment strategies. Those undergoing abstinence may experience more severe acute withdrawal syndromes. In our review, 100% of patients undergoing abstinence were managed inpatient and nearly all required multiple medications to stabilize symptoms.<span><sup>3</sup></span> The monotherapy use of baclofens in the published literature has only been for aiding a phenibut taper, or after the acute stabilization phase in abstinence (e.g., maintenance).<span><sup>3</sup></span> The phrasing in this table could be interpreted to suggest baclofen as a monotherapy for patients admitted to handle acute withdrawal during the initial phases of abstinence. Given the risk for severe outcomes in these patients (seizure in 9.1%, intubation in 27.7%), it is important to point out baclofen has no data to support its use as a single agent in this setting.<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>Finally, the authors discuss baclofen dosing and highlight a previously suggested dosing regimen of 8-10 mg of baclofen per 1 g of phenibut. This recommendation stems from a single case with no comparator.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Every other case report, which utilized baclofen successfully, is just as valid. The only difference is that these authors proposed a dosing strategy in their text. Despite a total lack of scientific rationale, it has unfortunately become a prevalent discussion point in other texts. This suggested dosing implies baclofen is 100 times more potent than phenibut. However, in vitro data demonstrates baclofen has a 28-fold higher affinity for the gamma amino butyric acid-B receptor than phenibut.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Many patients in this review were taking &gt;20 g of phenibut, which would require more than 200 mg per day of baclofen.<span><sup>1</sup></span> While the authors note baclofen has been used safely at very high doses for alcohol withdrawal, it is not without risk.<span><sup>6</sup></span> In our review of all reported baclofen regimens, only four patients required more than 100 mg of baclofen per day and the maximum reported dose was 130 mg.<span><sup>4</sup></span> The safety of such high doses in phenibut withdrawal is truly not known.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p><p>No funding was provided for this research.</p>","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"64 9","pages":"1181-1182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcph.2463","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Back Pedaling on Baclofen: Highlighting Concerns Surrounding Baclofen use in Phenibut Withdrawal\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Feldman PharmD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcph.2463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To the Editor:</p><p>I applaud Drs. Penzak and Bulloch for attempting to organize the sparse phenibut literature into usable clinical information.<span><sup>1</sup></span> However, some case information reported within this article requires correction. Additionally, important considerations for baclofen use in withdrawal need to be emphasized.</p><p>In the authors' discussion of baclofen use for withdrawal, they state: “This approach has been questioned, especially in patients who may be at risk of seizures. Fortunately, there were no reported seizures in any of the published cases after baclofen initiation.”</p><p>This statement is incorrect. It cites a case report, published by our author group, in which a patient has a seizure after being sent home on baclofen for phenibut withdrawal.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Later in the discussion, they do accurately describe our case report, contradicting their own statement.</p><p>Next, in the authors' discussion of pharmacotherapy for withdrawal management they comment in table 1 that baclofen “Has been used successfully alone and in combination (usually with a benzodiazepine) for the treatment of phenibut withdrawal.” However, withdrawal management entails various strategies. Some patients may taper from phenibut, while others will undergo abstinence, the two may require different treatment strategies. Those undergoing abstinence may experience more severe acute withdrawal syndromes. In our review, 100% of patients undergoing abstinence were managed inpatient and nearly all required multiple medications to stabilize symptoms.<span><sup>3</sup></span> The monotherapy use of baclofens in the published literature has only been for aiding a phenibut taper, or after the acute stabilization phase in abstinence (e.g., maintenance).<span><sup>3</sup></span> The phrasing in this table could be interpreted to suggest baclofen as a monotherapy for patients admitted to handle acute withdrawal during the initial phases of abstinence. Given the risk for severe outcomes in these patients (seizure in 9.1%, intubation in 27.7%), it is important to point out baclofen has no data to support its use as a single agent in this setting.<span><sup>3</sup></span></p><p>Finally, the authors discuss baclofen dosing and highlight a previously suggested dosing regimen of 8-10 mg of baclofen per 1 g of phenibut. This recommendation stems from a single case with no comparator.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Every other case report, which utilized baclofen successfully, is just as valid. The only difference is that these authors proposed a dosing strategy in their text. Despite a total lack of scientific rationale, it has unfortunately become a prevalent discussion point in other texts. This suggested dosing implies baclofen is 100 times more potent than phenibut. However, in vitro data demonstrates baclofen has a 28-fold higher affinity for the gamma amino butyric acid-B receptor than phenibut.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Many patients in this review were taking &gt;20 g of phenibut, which would require more than 200 mg per day of baclofen.<span><sup>1</sup></span> While the authors note baclofen has been used safely at very high doses for alcohol withdrawal, it is not without risk.<span><sup>6</sup></span> In our review of all reported baclofen regimens, only four patients required more than 100 mg of baclofen per day and the maximum reported dose was 130 mg.<span><sup>4</sup></span> The safety of such high doses in phenibut withdrawal is truly not known.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p><p>No funding was provided for this research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"64 9\",\"pages\":\"1181-1182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcph.2463\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcph.2463\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcph.2463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

致编辑:我对 Penzak 和 Bulloch 医生试图将稀少的菲尼布汀文献整理成可用的临床信息表示赞赏。此外,还需要强调在戒断期使用巴氯芬的重要注意事项。作者在讨论戒断期使用巴氯芬时指出:"这种方法受到了质疑:作者在讨论巴氯芬用于戒断时指出:"这种方法受到质疑,尤其是对可能有癫痫发作风险的患者。幸运的是,在已发表的病例中,没有一例在开始使用巴氯芬后出现癫痫发作。2 在后面的讨论中,他们确实准确地描述了我们的病例报告,这与他们自己的说法相矛盾。接下来,在作者关于戒断治疗药物疗法的讨论中,他们在表 1 中评论说,巴氯芬 "已经成功地单独或联合(通常与苯二氮卓类药物一起使用)用于治疗苯布停药"。然而,戒断治疗需要采取多种策略。一些患者可能会逐渐减少服用菲尼布汀,而另一些患者则会戒断菲尼布汀,两者可能需要不同的治疗策略。接受戒断治疗的患者可能会出现更严重的急性戒断综合征。在我们的综述中,100% 的戒断患者都接受了住院治疗,几乎所有患者都需要多种药物来稳定症状。3 已发表的文献中,巴氯芬的单药治疗仅用于协助菲尼布汀的减量,或在戒断的急性稳定阶段(如维持阶段)后使用。考虑到这些患者出现严重后果的风险(9.1% 的患者出现癫痫发作,27.7% 的患者出现插管),有必要指出巴氯芬没有数据支持在这种情况下作为单一药物使用。3 最后,作者讨论了巴氯芬的剂量,并强调了之前建议的剂量方案,即每 1 克菲尼布汀服用 8-10 毫克巴氯芬。4 其他成功使用巴氯芬的病例报告也同样有效。唯一不同的是,这些作者在文中提出了用药策略。尽管完全缺乏科学依据,但不幸的是,这已成为其他文章中的一个普遍讨论点。这种建议剂量意味着巴氯芬的药效比菲尼布特强 100 倍。然而,体外数据显示,巴氯芬对γ-氨基丁酸-B 受体的亲和力比菲尼布特高 28 倍。5 在这篇综述中,许多患者服用了 20 克菲尼布特,这就需要每天服用 200 毫克以上的巴氯芬。在我们对所有报道的巴氯芬治疗方案进行的审查中,只有四名患者每天需要超过 100 毫克的巴氯芬,而报道的最大剂量为 130 毫克。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Back Pedaling on Baclofen: Highlighting Concerns Surrounding Baclofen use in Phenibut Withdrawal

To the Editor:

I applaud Drs. Penzak and Bulloch for attempting to organize the sparse phenibut literature into usable clinical information.1 However, some case information reported within this article requires correction. Additionally, important considerations for baclofen use in withdrawal need to be emphasized.

In the authors' discussion of baclofen use for withdrawal, they state: “This approach has been questioned, especially in patients who may be at risk of seizures. Fortunately, there were no reported seizures in any of the published cases after baclofen initiation.”

This statement is incorrect. It cites a case report, published by our author group, in which a patient has a seizure after being sent home on baclofen for phenibut withdrawal.2 Later in the discussion, they do accurately describe our case report, contradicting their own statement.

Next, in the authors' discussion of pharmacotherapy for withdrawal management they comment in table 1 that baclofen “Has been used successfully alone and in combination (usually with a benzodiazepine) for the treatment of phenibut withdrawal.” However, withdrawal management entails various strategies. Some patients may taper from phenibut, while others will undergo abstinence, the two may require different treatment strategies. Those undergoing abstinence may experience more severe acute withdrawal syndromes. In our review, 100% of patients undergoing abstinence were managed inpatient and nearly all required multiple medications to stabilize symptoms.3 The monotherapy use of baclofens in the published literature has only been for aiding a phenibut taper, or after the acute stabilization phase in abstinence (e.g., maintenance).3 The phrasing in this table could be interpreted to suggest baclofen as a monotherapy for patients admitted to handle acute withdrawal during the initial phases of abstinence. Given the risk for severe outcomes in these patients (seizure in 9.1%, intubation in 27.7%), it is important to point out baclofen has no data to support its use as a single agent in this setting.3

Finally, the authors discuss baclofen dosing and highlight a previously suggested dosing regimen of 8-10 mg of baclofen per 1 g of phenibut. This recommendation stems from a single case with no comparator.4 Every other case report, which utilized baclofen successfully, is just as valid. The only difference is that these authors proposed a dosing strategy in their text. Despite a total lack of scientific rationale, it has unfortunately become a prevalent discussion point in other texts. This suggested dosing implies baclofen is 100 times more potent than phenibut. However, in vitro data demonstrates baclofen has a 28-fold higher affinity for the gamma amino butyric acid-B receptor than phenibut.5 Many patients in this review were taking >20 g of phenibut, which would require more than 200 mg per day of baclofen.1 While the authors note baclofen has been used safely at very high doses for alcohol withdrawal, it is not without risk.6 In our review of all reported baclofen regimens, only four patients required more than 100 mg of baclofen per day and the maximum reported dose was 130 mg.4 The safety of such high doses in phenibut withdrawal is truly not known.

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

No funding was provided for this research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Issue Information Issue Information Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Intravenous Candidate Biosimilar CT-P47 and Reference Tocilizumab: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 1 Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1