主动脉疾病家族史对复杂主动脉瘤血管内动脉瘤修补术疗效的影响

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.05.011
Titia A L Sulzer, Thomas Mesnard, Andres Schanzer, Carlos H Timaran, Darren B Schneider, Mark A Farber, Adam W Beck, Ying Huang, Gustavo S Oderich
{"title":"主动脉疾病家族史对复杂主动脉瘤血管内动脉瘤修补术疗效的影响","authors":"Titia A L Sulzer, Thomas Mesnard, Andres Schanzer, Carlos H Timaran, Darren B Schneider, Mark A Farber, Adam W Beck, Ying Huang, Gustavo S Oderich","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The clinical significance of family history (FH) of aortic disease on the outcomes of fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (FB-EVAR) has not been well described. This study aimed to assess how FH of aortic disease affects outcomes following FB-EVAR for complex aortic aneurysms (CAAs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of consecutive patients enrolled in 10 ongoing, prospective, non-randomised, physician sponsored, investigational device exemption studies to evaluate FB-EVAR (2005 - 2022) in the United States Aortic Research Consortium database. Patients were stratified by presence or absence of FH of any aortic disease in any relative. Patients with confirmed genetically triggered aortic diseases were excluded. Primary outcomes were 30 day major adverse events (MAEs) and late survival. Secondary outcomes included late secondary interventions and aneurysm sac enlargement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 2 901 patients underwent FB-EVAR. A total of 2 355 patients (81.2%) were included in the final analysis: 427 (18.1%) with and 1 928 (81.9%) without a FH of aortic disease. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and aneurysm extent were similar between the groups. Patients with a FH of aortic disease more frequently had prior open abdominal aortic repair, but less frequently had prior endovascular aneurysm repair (p < .050). There were no statistically significant differences in 30 day mortality (4% vs. 2%; p = .12) and MAEs (12% vs. 12%; p = .89) for patients with or without a FH of aortic disease. Three year survival estimates were 71% (95% confidence interval [CI] 67 - 78%) and 71% (95% CI 68 - 74%), respectively (p = .74). Freedom from secondary intervention and aneurysm sac enlargement were also not statistically significantly different between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A FH of aortic disease had no impact on 30 day or midterm outcomes of FB-EVAR of CAAs. In the absence of an identified genetically triggered aortic disease, treatment selection for CAAs should be based on clinical risk and patient anatomy rather than FH of aortic disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"712-718"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Family History of Aortic Disease on Outcomes of Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aneurysm Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms.\",\"authors\":\"Titia A L Sulzer, Thomas Mesnard, Andres Schanzer, Carlos H Timaran, Darren B Schneider, Mark A Farber, Adam W Beck, Ying Huang, Gustavo S Oderich\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.05.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The clinical significance of family history (FH) of aortic disease on the outcomes of fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (FB-EVAR) has not been well described. This study aimed to assess how FH of aortic disease affects outcomes following FB-EVAR for complex aortic aneurysms (CAAs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of consecutive patients enrolled in 10 ongoing, prospective, non-randomised, physician sponsored, investigational device exemption studies to evaluate FB-EVAR (2005 - 2022) in the United States Aortic Research Consortium database. Patients were stratified by presence or absence of FH of any aortic disease in any relative. Patients with confirmed genetically triggered aortic diseases were excluded. Primary outcomes were 30 day major adverse events (MAEs) and late survival. Secondary outcomes included late secondary interventions and aneurysm sac enlargement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 2 901 patients underwent FB-EVAR. A total of 2 355 patients (81.2%) were included in the final analysis: 427 (18.1%) with and 1 928 (81.9%) without a FH of aortic disease. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and aneurysm extent were similar between the groups. Patients with a FH of aortic disease more frequently had prior open abdominal aortic repair, but less frequently had prior endovascular aneurysm repair (p < .050). There were no statistically significant differences in 30 day mortality (4% vs. 2%; p = .12) and MAEs (12% vs. 12%; p = .89) for patients with or without a FH of aortic disease. Three year survival estimates were 71% (95% confidence interval [CI] 67 - 78%) and 71% (95% CI 68 - 74%), respectively (p = .74). Freedom from secondary intervention and aneurysm sac enlargement were also not statistically significantly different between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A FH of aortic disease had no impact on 30 day or midterm outcomes of FB-EVAR of CAAs. In the absence of an identified genetically triggered aortic disease, treatment selection for CAAs should be based on clinical risk and patient anatomy rather than FH of aortic disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"712-718\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.05.011\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.05.011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:主动脉疾病家族史(FH)对栅栏式/分支式血管内动脉瘤修补术(FB-EVAR)疗效的临床意义尚未得到很好的描述。本研究旨在评估主动脉疾病家族史对复杂主动脉瘤(CAA)FB-EVAR术后疗效的影响:本研究回顾性分析了美国主动脉研究联盟数据库中 10 项正在进行的、前瞻性的、非随机的、由医生发起的、旨在评估 FB-EVAR 的研究(2005 - 2022 年)中连续入组患者的临床数据。根据患者任何亲属是否患有任何主动脉疾病的 FH 对患者进行分层。已证实患有遗传性主动脉疾病的患者被排除在外。主要结果为30天主要不良事件(MAE)和后期存活率。次要结果包括后期二次干预和动脉瘤囊扩大:研究期间,2 901 名患者接受了 FB-EVAR。共有 2 355 名患者(81.2%)纳入最终分析:427 名(18.1%)患有主动脉疾病,1 928 名(81.9%)未患有 FH。两组患者的人口统计学特征、临床特征和动脉瘤范围相似。患有主动脉疾病的 FH 患者更多曾进行过开放式腹主动脉修复术,但较少进行过血管内动脉瘤修复术(P < 050)。主动脉疾病 FH 患者与非 FH 患者的 30 天死亡率(4% vs. 2%; p = .12)和 MAEs(12% vs. 12%; p = .89)差异无统计学意义。三年生存率分别为 71%(95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.67 - 0.78%)和 71%(95% 置信区间 0.68 - 0.74%)(P = .74)。各组之间的二次干预自由度和动脉瘤囊增大也没有显著的统计学差异:结论:主动脉疾病家族史对CAA FB-EVAR的30天和中期预后没有影响。结论:主动脉疾病家族史对 CAA 的 30 天和中期预后没有影响。在没有确定的遗传性主动脉疾病的情况下,CAA 的治疗选择应基于临床风险和患者解剖结构,而不是主动脉疾病家族史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Family History of Aortic Disease on Outcomes of Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aneurysm Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms.

Objective: The clinical significance of family history (FH) of aortic disease on the outcomes of fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (FB-EVAR) has not been well described. This study aimed to assess how FH of aortic disease affects outcomes following FB-EVAR for complex aortic aneurysms (CAAs).

Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of consecutive patients enrolled in 10 ongoing, prospective, non-randomised, physician sponsored, investigational device exemption studies to evaluate FB-EVAR (2005 - 2022) in the United States Aortic Research Consortium database. Patients were stratified by presence or absence of FH of any aortic disease in any relative. Patients with confirmed genetically triggered aortic diseases were excluded. Primary outcomes were 30 day major adverse events (MAEs) and late survival. Secondary outcomes included late secondary interventions and aneurysm sac enlargement.

Results: During the study period, 2 901 patients underwent FB-EVAR. A total of 2 355 patients (81.2%) were included in the final analysis: 427 (18.1%) with and 1 928 (81.9%) without a FH of aortic disease. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and aneurysm extent were similar between the groups. Patients with a FH of aortic disease more frequently had prior open abdominal aortic repair, but less frequently had prior endovascular aneurysm repair (p < .050). There were no statistically significant differences in 30 day mortality (4% vs. 2%; p = .12) and MAEs (12% vs. 12%; p = .89) for patients with or without a FH of aortic disease. Three year survival estimates were 71% (95% confidence interval [CI] 67 - 78%) and 71% (95% CI 68 - 74%), respectively (p = .74). Freedom from secondary intervention and aneurysm sac enlargement were also not statistically significantly different between groups.

Conclusion: A FH of aortic disease had no impact on 30 day or midterm outcomes of FB-EVAR of CAAs. In the absence of an identified genetically triggered aortic disease, treatment selection for CAAs should be based on clinical risk and patient anatomy rather than FH of aortic disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
471
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles. Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.
期刊最新文献
European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2025 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Trauma. Availability of Great Saphenous Vein for Infrainguinal Bypass. Open Surgery for Carotid Aneurysm: Age and Comorbidities Are Not Strict Contraindications. Recurrent Popliteal Vein Aneurysm. Elevated High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Risk of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Prospective Population Based Study in The Norwegian HUNT Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1