丘陵地区院外心脏骤停的特征和结果:来自日本长崎医疗区的 Utstein 登记数据

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Acute Medicine & Surgery Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1002/ams2.966
Valeryia Zmushka, Goro Tajima, Keita Iyama, Koichi Hayakawa, Kazunori Yamashita, Takamitsu Inokuma, Hiroo Izumino, Takanobu Otaguro, Eri Uemura, Tomohiro Ueki, Shimon Murahashi, Shuhei Yamano, Kensuke Takahashi, Yoshihiro Aoki, Atsuko Tachikawa, Osamu Tasaki
{"title":"丘陵地区院外心脏骤停的特征和结果:来自日本长崎医疗区的 Utstein 登记数据","authors":"Valeryia Zmushka,&nbsp;Goro Tajima,&nbsp;Keita Iyama,&nbsp;Koichi Hayakawa,&nbsp;Kazunori Yamashita,&nbsp;Takamitsu Inokuma,&nbsp;Hiroo Izumino,&nbsp;Takanobu Otaguro,&nbsp;Eri Uemura,&nbsp;Tomohiro Ueki,&nbsp;Shimon Murahashi,&nbsp;Shuhei Yamano,&nbsp;Kensuke Takahashi,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Aoki,&nbsp;Atsuko Tachikawa,&nbsp;Osamu Tasaki","doi":"10.1002/ams2.966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To analyze characteristics and investigate prognostic indicators of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in a hilly area in Japan.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective population-based study was conducted using the Utstein Registry for 4280 OHCA patients in the Nagasaki Medical Region (NMR) registered over the 10-year period from 2011 to 2020. The main outcome measure was a favorable cerebral performance category (CPC 1–2). Sites at which OHCA occurred were classified into “sloped places (SPs)” (not easily accessible by emergency medical services [EMS] personnel due to slopes) and “accessible places (APs)” (EMS personnel could park an ambulance close to the site). The characteristics and prognosis based on CPC were compared between SPs and APs, and multivariable analysis was performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No significant improvement in prognosis occurred in the NMR from 2011 to 2020. Prognosis in SPs was significantly worse than that in APs. However, multivariable analysis did not identify SP as a prognostic indicator. The following factors were associated with survival and CPC 1–2: age group, witness status, first documented rhythm, bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) use, use of mechanical CPR (m-CPR) device or esophageal obturator airway (EOA), and year. Both m-CPR and EOA use were associated with a poor prognosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In a hilly area, OHCA patients in SPs had a worse prognosis than those in APs, but SPs was not significantly associated with prognosis by multivariable analysis. Interventions to increase bystander-initiated CPR and AED use could potentially improve outcomes of OHCA in the NMR.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7196,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ams2.966","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a hilly area: Utstein Registry data from the Nagasaki Medical Region, Japan\",\"authors\":\"Valeryia Zmushka,&nbsp;Goro Tajima,&nbsp;Keita Iyama,&nbsp;Koichi Hayakawa,&nbsp;Kazunori Yamashita,&nbsp;Takamitsu Inokuma,&nbsp;Hiroo Izumino,&nbsp;Takanobu Otaguro,&nbsp;Eri Uemura,&nbsp;Tomohiro Ueki,&nbsp;Shimon Murahashi,&nbsp;Shuhei Yamano,&nbsp;Kensuke Takahashi,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Aoki,&nbsp;Atsuko Tachikawa,&nbsp;Osamu Tasaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ams2.966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To analyze characteristics and investigate prognostic indicators of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in a hilly area in Japan.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective population-based study was conducted using the Utstein Registry for 4280 OHCA patients in the Nagasaki Medical Region (NMR) registered over the 10-year period from 2011 to 2020. The main outcome measure was a favorable cerebral performance category (CPC 1–2). Sites at which OHCA occurred were classified into “sloped places (SPs)” (not easily accessible by emergency medical services [EMS] personnel due to slopes) and “accessible places (APs)” (EMS personnel could park an ambulance close to the site). The characteristics and prognosis based on CPC were compared between SPs and APs, and multivariable analysis was performed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>No significant improvement in prognosis occurred in the NMR from 2011 to 2020. Prognosis in SPs was significantly worse than that in APs. However, multivariable analysis did not identify SP as a prognostic indicator. The following factors were associated with survival and CPC 1–2: age group, witness status, first documented rhythm, bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) use, use of mechanical CPR (m-CPR) device or esophageal obturator airway (EOA), and year. Both m-CPR and EOA use were associated with a poor prognosis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In a hilly area, OHCA patients in SPs had a worse prognosis than those in APs, but SPs was not significantly associated with prognosis by multivariable analysis. Interventions to increase bystander-initiated CPR and AED use could potentially improve outcomes of OHCA in the NMR.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acute Medicine & Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ams2.966\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acute Medicine & Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.966\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 分析日本丘陵地区院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的特征并研究其预后指标。 方法 使用 Utstein 登记系统对长崎医疗区(NMR)2011 年至 2020 年 10 年间登记的 4280 名院外心脏骤停患者进行了一项基于人群的回顾性研究。主要结果指标是良好脑功能分类(CPC 1-2)。发生 OHCA 的地点被分为 "斜坡地 (SP)"(由于斜坡,紧急医疗服务 [EMS] 人员不易到达)和 "可到达地 (AP)"(紧急医疗服务人员可将救护车停放在地点附近)。比较了SP和AP的特征和基于CPC的预后,并进行了多变量分析。 结果 从 2011 年到 2020 年,NMR 的预后没有明显改善。SP的预后明显差于AP。然而,多变量分析并未将 SP 确定为预后指标。以下因素与存活率和 CPC 1-2 相关:年龄组、目击者身份、首次记录的心律、旁观者启动的心肺复苏(CPR)和自动体外除颤器(AED)的使用、机械心肺复苏(m-CPR)设备或食管闭塞气道(EOA)的使用以及年份。使用机械心肺复苏器和食道闭塞气道与预后不良有关。 结论 在丘陵地区,SPs 中的 OHCA 患者的预后比 APs 中的患者差,但通过多变量分析,SPs 与预后的关系并不明显。采取干预措施,增加旁观者启动心肺复苏术和自动体外除颤器的使用,有可能改善北地中海地区 OHCA 的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characteristics and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a hilly area: Utstein Registry data from the Nagasaki Medical Region, Japan

Aim

To analyze characteristics and investigate prognostic indicators of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in a hilly area in Japan.

Methods

A retrospective population-based study was conducted using the Utstein Registry for 4280 OHCA patients in the Nagasaki Medical Region (NMR) registered over the 10-year period from 2011 to 2020. The main outcome measure was a favorable cerebral performance category (CPC 1–2). Sites at which OHCA occurred were classified into “sloped places (SPs)” (not easily accessible by emergency medical services [EMS] personnel due to slopes) and “accessible places (APs)” (EMS personnel could park an ambulance close to the site). The characteristics and prognosis based on CPC were compared between SPs and APs, and multivariable analysis was performed.

Results

No significant improvement in prognosis occurred in the NMR from 2011 to 2020. Prognosis in SPs was significantly worse than that in APs. However, multivariable analysis did not identify SP as a prognostic indicator. The following factors were associated with survival and CPC 1–2: age group, witness status, first documented rhythm, bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) use, use of mechanical CPR (m-CPR) device or esophageal obturator airway (EOA), and year. Both m-CPR and EOA use were associated with a poor prognosis.

Conclusion

In a hilly area, OHCA patients in SPs had a worse prognosis than those in APs, but SPs was not significantly associated with prognosis by multivariable analysis. Interventions to increase bystander-initiated CPR and AED use could potentially improve outcomes of OHCA in the NMR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acute Medicine & Surgery
Acute Medicine & Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of urinary culture on diagnosis and treatment strategy after empiric therapy in febrile neutropenic patients Adherence to balanced transfusion among severely injured patients: A post hoc analysis of the RESTRIC trial Increased number of dispatches in emergency medical services correlates to response time extension Successful transition from intravenous to inhalation anesthesia for respiratory management of coronavirus disease pneumonia: A case report Early do-not-attempt resuscitation orders and neurological outcomes in older out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient: A multicenter observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1