距离和/或旅行时间对农村和偏远地区医疗服务获取的影响:范围界定审查

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2024.101819
E.P. Mseke , B. Jessup , T. Barnett
{"title":"距离和/或旅行时间对农村和偏远地区医疗服务获取的影响:范围界定审查","authors":"E.P. Mseke ,&nbsp;B. Jessup ,&nbsp;T. Barnett","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>People living in rural and remote communities often have to travel long distances to access healthcare services. However, the complex relationship between distance and/or travel time and healthcare service access remains unclear. This scoping review of the literature aimed to further understand the nuances between distance and/or travel time and rural and remote residents’ access to healthcare services in developed countries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A review of published research papers from OECD countries cited in five databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL and Scopus) between 1993 and mid-2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From a total of 1418 articles identified, 135 met study inclusion criteria. One hundred and thirteen (83.7%) studies showed evidence of distance and/or travel time decay. Distance and/or travel time decay occurred at a distance as short as 16.1 km or 30 min, and as great as 90–100 km or 60 min. Studies showed that rural and remote residents travel further and longer to access specialist rather than generalist health services.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Distance and travel time are important considerations for rural and remote residents of OECD countries when accessing healthcare services. Travel time may be a more meaningful measure than distance when assessing healthcare access decisions in non-metropolitan populations. Further well-designed research is needed to better understand under what circumstances rural and remote people will travel for healthcare services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524000653/pdfft?md5=2773096355bcd08c4ed62bad4b79a650&pid=1-s2.0-S2214140524000653-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of distance and/or travel time on healthcare service access in rural and remote areas: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"E.P. Mseke ,&nbsp;B. Jessup ,&nbsp;T. Barnett\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>People living in rural and remote communities often have to travel long distances to access healthcare services. However, the complex relationship between distance and/or travel time and healthcare service access remains unclear. This scoping review of the literature aimed to further understand the nuances between distance and/or travel time and rural and remote residents’ access to healthcare services in developed countries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A review of published research papers from OECD countries cited in five databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL and Scopus) between 1993 and mid-2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From a total of 1418 articles identified, 135 met study inclusion criteria. One hundred and thirteen (83.7%) studies showed evidence of distance and/or travel time decay. Distance and/or travel time decay occurred at a distance as short as 16.1 km or 30 min, and as great as 90–100 km or 60 min. Studies showed that rural and remote residents travel further and longer to access specialist rather than generalist health services.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Distance and travel time are important considerations for rural and remote residents of OECD countries when accessing healthcare services. Travel time may be a more meaningful measure than distance when assessing healthcare access decisions in non-metropolitan populations. Further well-designed research is needed to better understand under what circumstances rural and remote people will travel for healthcare services.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524000653/pdfft?md5=2773096355bcd08c4ed62bad4b79a650&pid=1-s2.0-S2214140524000653-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524000653\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524000653","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言生活在农村和偏远社区的人们往往需要长途跋涉才能获得医疗服务。然而,距离和/或旅行时间与医疗服务获取之间的复杂关系仍不清楚。本文献综述旨在进一步了解发达国家中距离和/或旅行时间与农村和偏远地区居民获得医疗服务之间的细微差别。方法综述 1993 年至 2023 年中期在五个数据库(PubMed、PsycINFO、Medline、CINAHL 和 Scopus)中引用的经合组织国家已发表的研究论文。有 113 项(83.7%)研究显示了距离和/或旅行时间衰减的证据。距离和/或旅行时间衰减发生在短至 16.1 千米或 30 分钟,长至 90-100 千米或 60 分钟的距离上。研究表明,农村和偏远地区居民前往专科而非全科医疗机构就医的路程更远、时间更长。在评估非大都市人口获取医疗服务的决策时,旅行时间可能是比距离更有意义的衡量标准。要更好地了解农村和偏远地区居民在什么情况下会选择旅行来获取医疗服务,还需要进一步开展设计良好的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of distance and/or travel time on healthcare service access in rural and remote areas: A scoping review

Introduction

People living in rural and remote communities often have to travel long distances to access healthcare services. However, the complex relationship between distance and/or travel time and healthcare service access remains unclear. This scoping review of the literature aimed to further understand the nuances between distance and/or travel time and rural and remote residents’ access to healthcare services in developed countries.

Methods

A review of published research papers from OECD countries cited in five databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL and Scopus) between 1993 and mid-2023.

Results

From a total of 1418 articles identified, 135 met study inclusion criteria. One hundred and thirteen (83.7%) studies showed evidence of distance and/or travel time decay. Distance and/or travel time decay occurred at a distance as short as 16.1 km or 30 min, and as great as 90–100 km or 60 min. Studies showed that rural and remote residents travel further and longer to access specialist rather than generalist health services.

Conclusions

Distance and travel time are important considerations for rural and remote residents of OECD countries when accessing healthcare services. Travel time may be a more meaningful measure than distance when assessing healthcare access decisions in non-metropolitan populations. Further well-designed research is needed to better understand under what circumstances rural and remote people will travel for healthcare services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Deciphering the character of public transport participation in subjective well-being: Evidence from Hangzhou, China Health in mobility planning: An assessment of how health is considered in Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans New challenges arise from consolidation of gender, health and transport research Incident reporting and data monitoring of sexual violence and harassment on public transport Differences between adolescents' and their parents' perceived benefits and barriers to actively commute to school: The PACO y PACA project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1