关于肥胖症成人自我管理干预措施的建议:COMPAR-EU 项目。

IF 2.2 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Clinical Obesity Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1111/cob.12667
Melixa Medina-Aedo, Jessica Beltran, Claudia Valli, Carlos Canelo-Aybar, Yang Song, Marta Ballester, Jacqueline Bowman-Busato, Christos Christogiannis, Maria G. Grammatikopoulou, Oliver Groene, Monique Heijmans, Martine Hoogendorn, Sarah Louise Killeen, Katerina-Maria Kontouli, Dimitris Mavridis, Inka Miñambres, Beate Sigrid Mueller, Ena Niño de Guzman, Janneke Noordman, Carola Orrego, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez, Zuleika Saz-Parkinson, Georgios Seitidis, Rosa Suñol, Sofia Tsokani, Pablo Alonso-Coello
{"title":"关于肥胖症成人自我管理干预措施的建议:COMPAR-EU 项目。","authors":"Melixa Medina-Aedo,&nbsp;Jessica Beltran,&nbsp;Claudia Valli,&nbsp;Carlos Canelo-Aybar,&nbsp;Yang Song,&nbsp;Marta Ballester,&nbsp;Jacqueline Bowman-Busato,&nbsp;Christos Christogiannis,&nbsp;Maria G. Grammatikopoulou,&nbsp;Oliver Groene,&nbsp;Monique Heijmans,&nbsp;Martine Hoogendorn,&nbsp;Sarah Louise Killeen,&nbsp;Katerina-Maria Kontouli,&nbsp;Dimitris Mavridis,&nbsp;Inka Miñambres,&nbsp;Beate Sigrid Mueller,&nbsp;Ena Niño de Guzman,&nbsp;Janneke Noordman,&nbsp;Carola Orrego,&nbsp;Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez,&nbsp;Zuleika Saz-Parkinson,&nbsp;Georgios Seitidis,&nbsp;Rosa Suñol,&nbsp;Sofia Tsokani,&nbsp;Pablo Alonso-Coello","doi":"10.1111/cob.12667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Self-management interventions (SMIs) may improve disease management in adults living with obesity. We formulated evidence-based recommendations for SMIs within the context of the COMPAR-EU project. The multidisciplinary panel selected critical outcomes based on the COMPAR-EU core outcome set and established decision thresholds for each outcome. Recommendations were informed by systematic reviews of effects, cost-effectiveness, and a contextual assessment. To assess the certainty of the evidence and formulate the recommendations, we used the GRADE approach guidance. Overall, SMIs were deemed to have a small impact, but the absence of harmful effects and potential cumulative benefits indicated a favourable balance of effects, despite low certainty. SMIs showed variations in structure, intensity, and resource utilisation, but overall are likely to be cost-effective. Adapting SMIs to local contexts would enhance equity, acceptability, and feasibility, considering patients' values, and availability of resources and teamwork. Consequently, the panel made conditional recommendations favouring SMIs over usual care. The rigorous and explicit recommendations demonstrated the effectiveness of SMIs for adults living with obesity. However, the gaps in the literature influenced the panel to make only conditional recommendations in favour of SMIs. Further research is needed to strengthen the evidence base and improve recommendations' certainty and applicability.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Obesity","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommendations on self-management interventions for adults living with obesity: COMPAR-EU project\",\"authors\":\"Melixa Medina-Aedo,&nbsp;Jessica Beltran,&nbsp;Claudia Valli,&nbsp;Carlos Canelo-Aybar,&nbsp;Yang Song,&nbsp;Marta Ballester,&nbsp;Jacqueline Bowman-Busato,&nbsp;Christos Christogiannis,&nbsp;Maria G. Grammatikopoulou,&nbsp;Oliver Groene,&nbsp;Monique Heijmans,&nbsp;Martine Hoogendorn,&nbsp;Sarah Louise Killeen,&nbsp;Katerina-Maria Kontouli,&nbsp;Dimitris Mavridis,&nbsp;Inka Miñambres,&nbsp;Beate Sigrid Mueller,&nbsp;Ena Niño de Guzman,&nbsp;Janneke Noordman,&nbsp;Carola Orrego,&nbsp;Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez,&nbsp;Zuleika Saz-Parkinson,&nbsp;Georgios Seitidis,&nbsp;Rosa Suñol,&nbsp;Sofia Tsokani,&nbsp;Pablo Alonso-Coello\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cob.12667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Self-management interventions (SMIs) may improve disease management in adults living with obesity. We formulated evidence-based recommendations for SMIs within the context of the COMPAR-EU project. The multidisciplinary panel selected critical outcomes based on the COMPAR-EU core outcome set and established decision thresholds for each outcome. Recommendations were informed by systematic reviews of effects, cost-effectiveness, and a contextual assessment. To assess the certainty of the evidence and formulate the recommendations, we used the GRADE approach guidance. Overall, SMIs were deemed to have a small impact, but the absence of harmful effects and potential cumulative benefits indicated a favourable balance of effects, despite low certainty. SMIs showed variations in structure, intensity, and resource utilisation, but overall are likely to be cost-effective. Adapting SMIs to local contexts would enhance equity, acceptability, and feasibility, considering patients' values, and availability of resources and teamwork. Consequently, the panel made conditional recommendations favouring SMIs over usual care. The rigorous and explicit recommendations demonstrated the effectiveness of SMIs for adults living with obesity. However, the gaps in the literature influenced the panel to make only conditional recommendations in favour of SMIs. Further research is needed to strengthen the evidence base and improve recommendations' certainty and applicability.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Obesity\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Obesity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cob.12667\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cob.12667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自我管理干预(SMI)可改善肥胖症成人的疾病管理。我们在 COMPAR-EU 项目的背景下为 SMI 制定了循证建议。多学科专家小组根据 COMPAR-EU 核心结果集选择了关键结果,并为每种结果确定了决策阈值。建议参考了效果、成本效益和背景评估的系统回顾。为了评估证据的确定性并提出建议,我们使用了 GRADE 方法指南。总体而言,SMI 被认为影响较小,但尽管确定性较低,但没有有害影响和潜在的累积效益表明效果平衡是有利的。SMI在结构、强度和资源利用方面存在差异,但总体而言可能具有成本效益。考虑到患者的价值观、资源的可用性和团队合作,根据当地情况调整 SMI 可提高公平性、可接受性和可行性。因此,专家小组提出了有条件的建议,倾向于采用 SMI,而不是常规护理。这些严谨而明确的建议表明,SMI 对成年肥胖症患者是有效的。然而,由于文献资料的不足,专家组只提出了支持SMI的有条件建议。需要进一步开展研究,以加强证据基础,提高建议的确定性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recommendations on self-management interventions for adults living with obesity: COMPAR-EU project

Self-management interventions (SMIs) may improve disease management in adults living with obesity. We formulated evidence-based recommendations for SMIs within the context of the COMPAR-EU project. The multidisciplinary panel selected critical outcomes based on the COMPAR-EU core outcome set and established decision thresholds for each outcome. Recommendations were informed by systematic reviews of effects, cost-effectiveness, and a contextual assessment. To assess the certainty of the evidence and formulate the recommendations, we used the GRADE approach guidance. Overall, SMIs were deemed to have a small impact, but the absence of harmful effects and potential cumulative benefits indicated a favourable balance of effects, despite low certainty. SMIs showed variations in structure, intensity, and resource utilisation, but overall are likely to be cost-effective. Adapting SMIs to local contexts would enhance equity, acceptability, and feasibility, considering patients' values, and availability of resources and teamwork. Consequently, the panel made conditional recommendations favouring SMIs over usual care. The rigorous and explicit recommendations demonstrated the effectiveness of SMIs for adults living with obesity. However, the gaps in the literature influenced the panel to make only conditional recommendations in favour of SMIs. Further research is needed to strengthen the evidence base and improve recommendations' certainty and applicability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Obesity
Clinical Obesity ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Clinical Obesity is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality translational and clinical research papers and reviews focussing on obesity and its co-morbidities. Key areas of interest are: • Patient assessment, classification, diagnosis and prognosis • Drug treatments, clinical trials and supporting research • Bariatric surgery and follow-up issues • Surgical approaches to remove body fat • Pharmacological, dietary and behavioural approaches for weight loss • Clinical physiology • Clinically relevant epidemiology • Psychological aspects of obesity • Co-morbidities • Nursing and care of patients with obesity.
期刊最新文献
Healthcare utilization associated with obesity management in Ontario, Canada. Effect of the National Enhanced Service for weight management on the content of annual review consultations for patients living with obesity and hypertension and/or diabetes. Issue Information A cluster randomised controlled trial investigating the efficacy of family-centred obesity management program in primary care settings: A study protocol. Effect of interdisciplinary obesity care on metabolic markers and body weight in people with type 2 diabetes in a rural setting: A randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1