前列腺癌患者女性伴侣性健康评估调查的开发与验证。

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY European urology oncology Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.022
Stacy Loeb, Natasha Gupta, Daniela Wittmann, Christian J Nelson, John P Mulhall, Carolyn A Salter, Nataliya Byrne, Tatiana Sanchez Nolasco, Laura Zebib, Leigh Garrett, Elizabeth Schofield
{"title":"前列腺癌患者女性伴侣性健康评估调查的开发与验证。","authors":"Stacy Loeb, Natasha Gupta, Daniela Wittmann, Christian J Nelson, John P Mulhall, Carolyn A Salter, Nataliya Byrne, Tatiana Sanchez Nolasco, Laura Zebib, Leigh Garrett, Elizabeth Schofield","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and treatment can have a significant negative impact on sexual health, affecting patients and their partners; however, the impact on partners is insufficiently addressed in current practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We describe the development and validation of an instrument to measure sexual health in female partners of patients with PCa.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Questions assessing sexual health were developed through a literature review, two qualitative studies, and an expert consensus process. Candidate survey items were tested through cognitive interviews and used to iteratively refine the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The final questionnaire was tested in a validation study among 200 female partners.</p><p><strong>Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: </strong>We performed an exploratory factor analysis, followed by an analysis for internal validity, test-retest reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity.</p><p><strong>Results and limitations: </strong>An initial set of 32 items was developed and refined through cognitive interviews. The resulting 27-item questionnaire was tested among 200 female partners of patients with PCa from across the USA. The exploratory factor analysis eliminated eight items and revealed seven key factors: (1) distress/satisfaction, (2) loss of connection as a couple, (3) active communication, (4) discomfort with communication, (5) frustration with sexual counseling, (6) expansion of sexual repertoire, and (7) nonpenetrative sexual activity. The overall scale demonstrated strong internal consistency (ordinal alpha 0.94) and test-retest reliability (0.89). Strengths of the study include development and evaluation of the first questionnaire to evaluate sexual quality of life among female partners of patients with PCa. However, additional work is needed to assess sexual health and quality of life among male and nonbinary partners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed a new instrument, the Sexual Concerns In Partners of Patients with Prostate cancer (SCIPPP-F), and found it to be valid in a diverse sample of female partners across the USA.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>Our new instrument can be used to characterize sexual health among female partners of patients with prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of a Survey to Assess Sexual Health in Female Partners of Patients with Prostate Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Stacy Loeb, Natasha Gupta, Daniela Wittmann, Christian J Nelson, John P Mulhall, Carolyn A Salter, Nataliya Byrne, Tatiana Sanchez Nolasco, Laura Zebib, Leigh Garrett, Elizabeth Schofield\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and treatment can have a significant negative impact on sexual health, affecting patients and their partners; however, the impact on partners is insufficiently addressed in current practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We describe the development and validation of an instrument to measure sexual health in female partners of patients with PCa.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Questions assessing sexual health were developed through a literature review, two qualitative studies, and an expert consensus process. Candidate survey items were tested through cognitive interviews and used to iteratively refine the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The final questionnaire was tested in a validation study among 200 female partners.</p><p><strong>Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: </strong>We performed an exploratory factor analysis, followed by an analysis for internal validity, test-retest reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity.</p><p><strong>Results and limitations: </strong>An initial set of 32 items was developed and refined through cognitive interviews. The resulting 27-item questionnaire was tested among 200 female partners of patients with PCa from across the USA. The exploratory factor analysis eliminated eight items and revealed seven key factors: (1) distress/satisfaction, (2) loss of connection as a couple, (3) active communication, (4) discomfort with communication, (5) frustration with sexual counseling, (6) expansion of sexual repertoire, and (7) nonpenetrative sexual activity. The overall scale demonstrated strong internal consistency (ordinal alpha 0.94) and test-retest reliability (0.89). Strengths of the study include development and evaluation of the first questionnaire to evaluate sexual quality of life among female partners of patients with PCa. However, additional work is needed to assess sexual health and quality of life among male and nonbinary partners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed a new instrument, the Sexual Concerns In Partners of Patients with Prostate cancer (SCIPPP-F), and found it to be valid in a diverse sample of female partners across the USA.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>Our new instrument can be used to characterize sexual health among female partners of patients with prostate cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.022\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前列腺癌(PCa)的诊断和治疗会对患者及其伴侣的性健康产生严重的负面影响;然而,在目前的实践中,对伴侣的影响还没有得到充分解决:我们介绍了一种用于测量 PCa 患者女性伴侣性健康的工具的开发和验证情况:通过文献综述、两项定性研究和专家共识程序,开发了评估性健康的问题。候选调查项目通过认知访谈进行测试,并用于反复完善问卷:最终问卷在 200 名女性伴侣中进行了验证研究:我们进行了探索性因素分析,然后分析了内部有效性、测试-再测试可靠性、收敛有效性和区分有效性:通过认知访谈,我们开发并完善了最初的 32 个项目。在全美 200 名 PCa 患者的女性伴侣中测试了最终形成的 27 个项目的问卷。探索性因子分析剔除了 8 个项目,发现了 7 个关键因子:(1) 痛苦/满意;(2) 失去夫妻间的联系;(3) 积极沟通;(4) 沟通不适;(5) 性咨询的挫折感;(6) 性活动范围的扩大;(7) 非开放性的性活动。整个量表显示出很强的内部一致性(序数α 0.94)和测试再测可靠性(0.89)。该研究的优点包括开发和评估了第一份评估 PCa 患者女性伴侣性生活质量的问卷。然而,还需要做更多的工作来评估男性和非二元性伴侣的性健康和生活质量:我们开发了一种新的工具--前列腺癌患者伴侣性关注(SCIPPP-F),并发现它在美国各地不同的女性伴侣样本中是有效的。患者总结:我们的新工具可用于描述前列腺癌患者女性伴侣的性健康特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and Validation of a Survey to Assess Sexual Health in Female Partners of Patients with Prostate Cancer.

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and treatment can have a significant negative impact on sexual health, affecting patients and their partners; however, the impact on partners is insufficiently addressed in current practice.

Objective: We describe the development and validation of an instrument to measure sexual health in female partners of patients with PCa.

Design, setting, and participants: Questions assessing sexual health were developed through a literature review, two qualitative studies, and an expert consensus process. Candidate survey items were tested through cognitive interviews and used to iteratively refine the questionnaire.

Intervention: The final questionnaire was tested in a validation study among 200 female partners.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We performed an exploratory factor analysis, followed by an analysis for internal validity, test-retest reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity.

Results and limitations: An initial set of 32 items was developed and refined through cognitive interviews. The resulting 27-item questionnaire was tested among 200 female partners of patients with PCa from across the USA. The exploratory factor analysis eliminated eight items and revealed seven key factors: (1) distress/satisfaction, (2) loss of connection as a couple, (3) active communication, (4) discomfort with communication, (5) frustration with sexual counseling, (6) expansion of sexual repertoire, and (7) nonpenetrative sexual activity. The overall scale demonstrated strong internal consistency (ordinal alpha 0.94) and test-retest reliability (0.89). Strengths of the study include development and evaluation of the first questionnaire to evaluate sexual quality of life among female partners of patients with PCa. However, additional work is needed to assess sexual health and quality of life among male and nonbinary partners.

Conclusions: We developed a new instrument, the Sexual Concerns In Partners of Patients with Prostate cancer (SCIPPP-F), and found it to be valid in a diverse sample of female partners across the USA.

Patient summary: Our new instrument can be used to characterize sexual health among female partners of patients with prostate cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
期刊最新文献
Anatomic Factors Associated with Complications After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Repeat Prostate Cancer Screening using Blood-based Risk Prediction or Prostate-specific Antigen in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies : A Secondary Analysis of the STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial. A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning Models for the Automatic Detection, Localization, and Characterization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Colibactin Exerts Androgen-dependent and -independent Effects on Prostate Cancer. Combined Fixed-duration Systemic Treatment and Metastasis-directed Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1