幸福量表:乳腺癌患者的心理测量特性。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Integrative Cancer Therapies Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/15347354241249935
M Victoria Cerezo, Lorena M Soria-Reyes, Rafael Alarcón, María J Blanca
{"title":"幸福量表:乳腺癌患者的心理测量特性。","authors":"M Victoria Cerezo, Lorena M Soria-Reyes, Rafael Alarcón, María J Blanca","doi":"10.1177/15347354241249935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Promoting well-being is a key goal of cancer care, and it needs to be assessed using appropriate instruments. Flourishing is considered part of psychological well-being and it is commonly assessed with the Flourishing Scale (FS). To our knowledge, no studies have analyzed the psychometric properties of the FS in breast cancer patients. Our aim here was to provide validity evidence for use of the FS in this context.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 217 Spanish women with breast cancer who completed the FS and other scales assessing positive psychology constructs (life satisfaction, positive affect, resilience, self-esteem, optimism) and indicators of psychological maladjustment (negative affect, depression, anxiety, and stress). The internal structure of the FS was analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We calculated the average variance extracted (AVE) to evaluate convergent validity, and both McDonald's omega and Cronbach's alpha coefficients to estimate reliability. Item analysis was performed by computing corrected item-total correlations. Validity evidence based on relationships with other variables was obtained through Pearson correlation analysis, controlling for age and cancer stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CFA supported a single-factor structure, with adequate goodness-of-fit indices (CFI = 0.997, NNFI = 0.996, RMSEA = 0.069, and SRMR = 0.047) and standardized factor loadings ranging from 0.70 to 0.87. The value of the AVE was 0.63, and the reliability coefficient obtained with both procedures was 0.91. Corrected item-total correlations ranged from .62 to .78. Correlation analysis showed direct and strong associations between the FS score and scores on positive psychology constructs (range from 0.43 to 0.74), the strongest correlations being with positive affect and life satisfaction. The FS score was inversely correlated with scores on depression, anxiety, stress, negative affect, and pessimism (range from -0.14 to -0.52), the strongest association being with stress.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The FS is a useful tool for exploring well-being in the breast cancer context, providing useful information for psychological assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13734,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Cancer Therapies","volume":"23 ","pages":"15347354241249935"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Flourishing Scale: Psychometric Properties in Breast Cancer Patients.\",\"authors\":\"M Victoria Cerezo, Lorena M Soria-Reyes, Rafael Alarcón, María J Blanca\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15347354241249935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Promoting well-being is a key goal of cancer care, and it needs to be assessed using appropriate instruments. Flourishing is considered part of psychological well-being and it is commonly assessed with the Flourishing Scale (FS). To our knowledge, no studies have analyzed the psychometric properties of the FS in breast cancer patients. Our aim here was to provide validity evidence for use of the FS in this context.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 217 Spanish women with breast cancer who completed the FS and other scales assessing positive psychology constructs (life satisfaction, positive affect, resilience, self-esteem, optimism) and indicators of psychological maladjustment (negative affect, depression, anxiety, and stress). The internal structure of the FS was analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We calculated the average variance extracted (AVE) to evaluate convergent validity, and both McDonald's omega and Cronbach's alpha coefficients to estimate reliability. Item analysis was performed by computing corrected item-total correlations. Validity evidence based on relationships with other variables was obtained through Pearson correlation analysis, controlling for age and cancer stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CFA supported a single-factor structure, with adequate goodness-of-fit indices (CFI = 0.997, NNFI = 0.996, RMSEA = 0.069, and SRMR = 0.047) and standardized factor loadings ranging from 0.70 to 0.87. The value of the AVE was 0.63, and the reliability coefficient obtained with both procedures was 0.91. Corrected item-total correlations ranged from .62 to .78. Correlation analysis showed direct and strong associations between the FS score and scores on positive psychology constructs (range from 0.43 to 0.74), the strongest correlations being with positive affect and life satisfaction. The FS score was inversely correlated with scores on depression, anxiety, stress, negative affect, and pessimism (range from -0.14 to -0.52), the strongest association being with stress.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The FS is a useful tool for exploring well-being in the breast cancer context, providing useful information for psychological assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Cancer Therapies\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"15347354241249935\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11102690/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Cancer Therapies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347354241249935\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Cancer Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347354241249935","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:促进幸福感是癌症护理的一个关键目标,需要使用适当的工具对其进行评估。幸福感被认为是心理健康的一部分,通常使用幸福感量表(FS)进行评估。据我们所知,目前还没有研究对乳腺癌患者的幸福感量表的心理测量特性进行分析。我们的目的是为在这种情况下使用幸福感量表提供有效性证据:方法:217 名患有乳腺癌的西班牙女性参加了研究,她们完成了 FS 和其他量表,这些量表评估了积极心理结构(生活满意度、积极情绪、复原力、自尊、乐观)和心理不适应指标(消极情绪、抑郁、焦虑和压力)。我们使用确证因子分析(CFA)对 FS 的内部结构进行了分析。我们计算了平均方差提取率(AVE)来评估收敛效度,并计算了麦克唐纳Ω系数和克朗巴赫α系数来估计信度。项目分析是通过计算校正后的项目-总相关性来进行的。在控制年龄和癌症分期的情况下,通过皮尔逊相关分析获得了基于与其他变量关系的有效性证据:CFA支持单因素结构,拟合优度指数适当(CFI = 0.997,NNFI = 0.996,RMSEA = 0.069,SRMR = 0.047),标准化因素负荷在0.70至0.87之间。AVE值为0.63,两种程序得出的信度系数均为0.91。校正后的项目-总相关系数为 0.62 至 0.78。相关分析表明,FS 分值与积极心理学建构得分之间存在直接且紧密的联系(范围从 0.43 到 0.74),其中与积极情感和生活满意度的相关性最强。FS得分与抑郁、焦虑、压力、负面情绪和悲观情绪的得分呈反向相关(范围从-0.14到-0.52),其中与压力的相关性最强:讨论:FS 是探索乳腺癌患者幸福感的有用工具,可为心理评估提供有用信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Flourishing Scale: Psychometric Properties in Breast Cancer Patients.

Background/objective: Promoting well-being is a key goal of cancer care, and it needs to be assessed using appropriate instruments. Flourishing is considered part of psychological well-being and it is commonly assessed with the Flourishing Scale (FS). To our knowledge, no studies have analyzed the psychometric properties of the FS in breast cancer patients. Our aim here was to provide validity evidence for use of the FS in this context.

Method: Participants were 217 Spanish women with breast cancer who completed the FS and other scales assessing positive psychology constructs (life satisfaction, positive affect, resilience, self-esteem, optimism) and indicators of psychological maladjustment (negative affect, depression, anxiety, and stress). The internal structure of the FS was analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We calculated the average variance extracted (AVE) to evaluate convergent validity, and both McDonald's omega and Cronbach's alpha coefficients to estimate reliability. Item analysis was performed by computing corrected item-total correlations. Validity evidence based on relationships with other variables was obtained through Pearson correlation analysis, controlling for age and cancer stage.

Results: The CFA supported a single-factor structure, with adequate goodness-of-fit indices (CFI = 0.997, NNFI = 0.996, RMSEA = 0.069, and SRMR = 0.047) and standardized factor loadings ranging from 0.70 to 0.87. The value of the AVE was 0.63, and the reliability coefficient obtained with both procedures was 0.91. Corrected item-total correlations ranged from .62 to .78. Correlation analysis showed direct and strong associations between the FS score and scores on positive psychology constructs (range from 0.43 to 0.74), the strongest correlations being with positive affect and life satisfaction. The FS score was inversely correlated with scores on depression, anxiety, stress, negative affect, and pessimism (range from -0.14 to -0.52), the strongest association being with stress.

Discussion: The FS is a useful tool for exploring well-being in the breast cancer context, providing useful information for psychological assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Integrative Cancer Therapies
Integrative Cancer Therapies 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ICT is the first journal to spearhead and focus on a new and growing movement in cancer treatment. The journal emphasizes scientific understanding of alternative medicine and traditional medicine therapies, and their responsible integration with conventional health care. Integrative care includes therapeutic interventions in diet, lifestyle, exercise, stress care, and nutritional supplements, as well as experimental vaccines, chrono-chemotherapy, and other advanced treatments. Contributors are leading oncologists, researchers, nurses, and health-care professionals.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of the Traditional Japanese Medicine Goshajinkigan in Preventing Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Multicenter Randomized Comparative Trial Inhibition of Myeloma Cell Function by Cannabinoid-Enriched Product Associated With Regulation of Telomere and TP53 Corrigendum to “Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Patients With Advanced-Stage Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Following the Administration of Capsule Formulation of the Standardized Extract of Atractylodes lancea (Thunb) DC” Integrative Nursing Interventions for Cancer-Related Symptoms in Oncology Inpatients: Results of a Descriptive Pilot Study Implementation of a Mindful Walking Intervention in Breast Cancer Patients After Their Primary Oncologic Treatment: Results of a Qualitative Study Within a Randomized Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1