Christopher M Gill, Mark J Bullock, Andrew H Cohen
{"title":"硫胶体成像在区分夏科神经性关节病和骨髓炎方面的实用性:病例研究。","authors":"Christopher M Gill, Mark J Bullock, Andrew H Cohen","doi":"10.7547/21-235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Charcot's neuroarthropathy and osteomyelitis can have similar initial presentations. The ability to differentiate between the two pathologic conditions is essential, as each requires different treatment. We present a case of a 53-year-old woman with pain, swelling, and warmth in her left first metatarsophalangeal joint and first tarsometatarsal joint. Radiographs showed comminuted fractures at the base of the first metatarsal. Osteomyelitis was suspected by the primary team based on physical findings and a history of previous first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. A triphasic bone scan and an indium white blood cell scan were positive for osteomyelitis. The podiatric medical team was suspicious for possible Charcot's neuroarthropathy based on physical findings and uncontrolled blood glucose levels at the time of her previous arthrodesis. A sulfur colloid scan was performed and compared with an indium scan, which showed no evidence of osteomyelitis. This case demonstrates the usefulness of sulfur colloid imaging compared with an indium white blood cell scan to differentiate osteomyelitis from Charcot's neuroarthropathy. This case also highlights the importance of using clinical judgment to make the correct diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Utility of Sulfur Colloid Imaging to Differentiate Charcot's Neuroarthropathy from Osteomyelitis: A Case Study.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher M Gill, Mark J Bullock, Andrew H Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.7547/21-235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Charcot's neuroarthropathy and osteomyelitis can have similar initial presentations. The ability to differentiate between the two pathologic conditions is essential, as each requires different treatment. We present a case of a 53-year-old woman with pain, swelling, and warmth in her left first metatarsophalangeal joint and first tarsometatarsal joint. Radiographs showed comminuted fractures at the base of the first metatarsal. Osteomyelitis was suspected by the primary team based on physical findings and a history of previous first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. A triphasic bone scan and an indium white blood cell scan were positive for osteomyelitis. The podiatric medical team was suspicious for possible Charcot's neuroarthropathy based on physical findings and uncontrolled blood glucose levels at the time of her previous arthrodesis. A sulfur colloid scan was performed and compared with an indium scan, which showed no evidence of osteomyelitis. This case demonstrates the usefulness of sulfur colloid imaging compared with an indium white blood cell scan to differentiate osteomyelitis from Charcot's neuroarthropathy. This case also highlights the importance of using clinical judgment to make the correct diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7547/21-235\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/21-235","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Utility of Sulfur Colloid Imaging to Differentiate Charcot's Neuroarthropathy from Osteomyelitis: A Case Study.
Charcot's neuroarthropathy and osteomyelitis can have similar initial presentations. The ability to differentiate between the two pathologic conditions is essential, as each requires different treatment. We present a case of a 53-year-old woman with pain, swelling, and warmth in her left first metatarsophalangeal joint and first tarsometatarsal joint. Radiographs showed comminuted fractures at the base of the first metatarsal. Osteomyelitis was suspected by the primary team based on physical findings and a history of previous first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis. A triphasic bone scan and an indium white blood cell scan were positive for osteomyelitis. The podiatric medical team was suspicious for possible Charcot's neuroarthropathy based on physical findings and uncontrolled blood glucose levels at the time of her previous arthrodesis. A sulfur colloid scan was performed and compared with an indium scan, which showed no evidence of osteomyelitis. This case demonstrates the usefulness of sulfur colloid imaging compared with an indium white blood cell scan to differentiate osteomyelitis from Charcot's neuroarthropathy. This case also highlights the importance of using clinical judgment to make the correct diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.