在清醒开颅手术和协作脑图绘制过程中进行语言测试的数字平台的理论和证据基础。

IF 2.1 Q2 SURGERY BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies Pub Date : 2024-05-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsit-2023-000234
Damjan Veljanoski, Xin Yi Ng, Ciaran Scott Hill, Aimun A B Jamjoom
{"title":"在清醒开颅手术和协作脑图绘制过程中进行语言测试的数字平台的理论和证据基础。","authors":"Damjan Veljanoski, Xin Yi Ng, Ciaran Scott Hill, Aimun A B Jamjoom","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2023-000234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Build the theoretical and evidence-base for a digital platform (map-OR) which delivers intraoperative language tests during awake craniotomy and facilitates collaborative sharing of brain mapping data.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed methodology study including two scoping reviews, international survey, synthesis of development guiding principles and a risk assessment using failure modes and effects analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The two scoping reviews examined the literature published in the English language. International survey was completed by members of awake craniotomy teams from 14 countries.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Scoping review 1: number of technologies described for language mapping during awake craniotomy. Scoping review 2: barriers and facilitators to adopting novel technology in surgery. International survey: degree of language mapping technology penetration into clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 research articles describing 6 technologies were included. The technologies required a range of hardware components including portable devices, virtual reality headsets and large integrated multiscreen stacks. The facilitators and barriers of technology adoption in surgery were extracted from 11 studies and mapped onto the 4 Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology constructs. A total of 37 awake craniotomy teams from 14 countries completed the survey. Of the responses, 20 (54.1%) delivered their language tests digitally, 10 (27.0%) delivered tests using cards and 7 (18.9%) used a combination of both. The most commonly used devices were tablet computers (67.7%; n=21) and the most common software used was Microsoft PowerPoint (60.6%; n=20). Four key risks for the proposed digital platform were identified, the highest risk being a software and internet connectivity failure during surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work represents a rigorous and structured approach to the development of a digital platform for standardized intraoperative language testing during awake craniotomy and for collaborative sharing of brain mapping data.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>Scoping review protocol registrations in OSF registries (scoping review 1: osf.io/su9xm; scoping review 2: osf.io/x4wsc).</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11097893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theory and evidence-base for a digital platform for the delivery of language tests during awake craniotomy and collaborative brain mapping.\",\"authors\":\"Damjan Veljanoski, Xin Yi Ng, Ciaran Scott Hill, Aimun A B Jamjoom\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjsit-2023-000234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Build the theoretical and evidence-base for a digital platform (map-OR) which delivers intraoperative language tests during awake craniotomy and facilitates collaborative sharing of brain mapping data.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed methodology study including two scoping reviews, international survey, synthesis of development guiding principles and a risk assessment using failure modes and effects analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The two scoping reviews examined the literature published in the English language. International survey was completed by members of awake craniotomy teams from 14 countries.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Scoping review 1: number of technologies described for language mapping during awake craniotomy. Scoping review 2: barriers and facilitators to adopting novel technology in surgery. International survey: degree of language mapping technology penetration into clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 research articles describing 6 technologies were included. The technologies required a range of hardware components including portable devices, virtual reality headsets and large integrated multiscreen stacks. The facilitators and barriers of technology adoption in surgery were extracted from 11 studies and mapped onto the 4 Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology constructs. A total of 37 awake craniotomy teams from 14 countries completed the survey. Of the responses, 20 (54.1%) delivered their language tests digitally, 10 (27.0%) delivered tests using cards and 7 (18.9%) used a combination of both. The most commonly used devices were tablet computers (67.7%; n=21) and the most common software used was Microsoft PowerPoint (60.6%; n=20). Four key risks for the proposed digital platform were identified, the highest risk being a software and internet connectivity failure during surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work represents a rigorous and structured approach to the development of a digital platform for standardized intraoperative language testing during awake craniotomy and for collaborative sharing of brain mapping data.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>Scoping review protocol registrations in OSF registries (scoping review 1: osf.io/su9xm; scoping review 2: osf.io/x4wsc).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11097893/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2023-000234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2023-000234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:为数字平台(map-OR)建立理论和证据基础:为数字平台(map-OR)建立理论和证据基础,该平台可在清醒开颅手术中提供术中语言测试,并促进脑图数据的协作共享:设计:混合方法研究,包括两篇范围综述、国际调查、开发指导原则综述以及使用失效模式和效应分析进行的风险评估:背景:两份范围界定综述审查了以英语出版的文献。国际调查由来自 14 个国家的清醒开颅手术团队成员完成:范围界定综述 1:清醒开颅手术中语言映射技术的数量。范围综述 2:在手术中采用新技术的障碍和促进因素。国际调查:语言映射技术在临床实践中的渗透程度:结果:共收录了 12 篇描述 6 种技术的研究文章。这些技术需要一系列硬件组件,包括便携式设备、虚拟现实头盔和大型集成多屏幕堆栈。从 11 项研究中提取了手术中采用技术的促进因素和障碍,并将其映射到技术接受和使用的 4 个统一理论结构中。共有来自 14 个国家的 37 个清醒开颅手术团队完成了调查。其中,20 个团队(54.1%)以数字方式进行语言测试,10 个团队(27.0%)使用卡片进行测试,7 个团队(18.9%)将两者结合使用。最常用的设备是平板电脑(67.7%;n=21),最常用的软件是 Microsoft PowerPoint(60.6%;n=20)。研究发现,拟议的数字平台存在四大风险,其中最大的风险是手术过程中出现软件和网络连接故障:这项工作代表了一种严谨、结构化的方法,可用于开发数字平台,在清醒开颅手术中进行标准化术中语言测试,并实现脑图数据的协作共享:范围界定审查方案在 OSF 登记处登记(范围界定审查 1:osf.io/su9xm;范围界定审查 2:osf.io/x4wsc)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Theory and evidence-base for a digital platform for the delivery of language tests during awake craniotomy and collaborative brain mapping.

Objectives: Build the theoretical and evidence-base for a digital platform (map-OR) which delivers intraoperative language tests during awake craniotomy and facilitates collaborative sharing of brain mapping data.

Design: Mixed methodology study including two scoping reviews, international survey, synthesis of development guiding principles and a risk assessment using failure modes and effects analysis.

Setting: The two scoping reviews examined the literature published in the English language. International survey was completed by members of awake craniotomy teams from 14 countries.

Main outcome measures: Scoping review 1: number of technologies described for language mapping during awake craniotomy. Scoping review 2: barriers and facilitators to adopting novel technology in surgery. International survey: degree of language mapping technology penetration into clinical practice.

Results: A total of 12 research articles describing 6 technologies were included. The technologies required a range of hardware components including portable devices, virtual reality headsets and large integrated multiscreen stacks. The facilitators and barriers of technology adoption in surgery were extracted from 11 studies and mapped onto the 4 Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology constructs. A total of 37 awake craniotomy teams from 14 countries completed the survey. Of the responses, 20 (54.1%) delivered their language tests digitally, 10 (27.0%) delivered tests using cards and 7 (18.9%) used a combination of both. The most commonly used devices were tablet computers (67.7%; n=21) and the most common software used was Microsoft PowerPoint (60.6%; n=20). Four key risks for the proposed digital platform were identified, the highest risk being a software and internet connectivity failure during surgery.

Conclusions: This work represents a rigorous and structured approach to the development of a digital platform for standardized intraoperative language testing during awake craniotomy and for collaborative sharing of brain mapping data.

Trial registration number: Scoping review protocol registrations in OSF registries (scoping review 1: osf.io/su9xm; scoping review 2: osf.io/x4wsc).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
The impact of adjuvant antibiotic hydrogel application on the primary stability of uncemented hip stems. Prospective randomized evaluation of the sustained impact of assistive artificial intelligence on anesthetists' ultrasound scanning for regional anesthesia. Clinical effectiveness of a modified muscle sparing posterior technique compared with a standard lateral approach in hip hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures (HemiSPAIRE): a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. IDEAL evaluation for global surgery innovation. No frugal innovation without frugal evaluation: the Global IDEAL Sub-Framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1