开发并验证简短的临床风险管理实施(Short CRiMI)问卷。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2024.04.003
Nikoloz Gambashidze , Matthias Marsall , Martina Schmiedhofer , Karl Blum , Hannah Roesner , Reinhard Strametz , Matthias Weigl
{"title":"开发并验证简短的临床风险管理实施(Short CRiMI)问卷。","authors":"Nikoloz Gambashidze ,&nbsp;Matthias Marsall ,&nbsp;Martina Schmiedhofer ,&nbsp;Karl Blum ,&nbsp;Hannah Roesner ,&nbsp;Reinhard Strametz ,&nbsp;Matthias Weigl","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Clinical Risk Management (CRM) is an important instrument to continuously improve safety of health care delivery. In Germany, hospitals are required by law to implement CRM and incidence reporting systems. Since 2010, nation-wide surveys have been conducted periodically to evaluate implementation of CRM in hospitals. The instrument used in these surveys is constantly being updated to reflect previous experiences, as well as to adapt to ongoing trends and developments in CRM practices. The survey instrument used in 2022 consisted of up to 200 items and took up to an hour to complete. In this study, we aimed to develop a short instrument to measure the level of CRM implementation in hospitals, evaluate its psychometric properties, and to offer benchmarking data for health care facilities of different sizes.</p><p>We used data collected in 2022 as part of KHaSiMiR study, employing a cross-sectional self-reported online survey. The hospital administrations were invited to designate one CRM manager to participate in the study. Out of 1,411 general hospitals invited, 401 responses were collected (response rate of 28%). After removing the cases with excessive missings, we imputed remaining missing values using multiple imputation, and split the resulting sample (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->362) in two halves (i.e., exploratory and testing subsamples). A principal component analysis was applied on the first subsample. We validated the resulting model using confirmatory factor analysis in the testing subsample. We evaluated internal consistency, and tested external validity of the established instrument using correlation analysis with two single-item measures: subjective evaluation of CRM implementation compared to similar organizations and compared to own ideal level. The principal component analysis included 45 items from the full instrument. The analysis resulted in a three-factor model with 26 items. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the model demonstrated acceptable fit with the data according to the commonly used fit indices: Chi<sup>2</sup>/df<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.36, CFI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.941, TLI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.930, RMSEA<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.045 (90% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.032–0.056), SRMR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.049. Cronbach’s alpha of all three factors was good (&gt;0.70). All three factors had statistically significant positive correlations with each other (0.359–0.497) and with the two single items (0.282–0.532). None of the correlations were high enough (&gt;0.7) to indicate multicollinearity.</p><p>The proposed short clinical risk management implementation (Short CRiMI) questionnaire is psychometrically valid and can be used to rapidly evaluate CRM implementation in hospitals. Further research can provide evidence of its external validity and association with quality and safety outcomes. Benchmarking data can be used to compare the results with the data from the most recent Germany-wide survey.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000825/pdfft?md5=dfe2f8caeb3022ad8985506e1d7cc388&pid=1-s2.0-S1865921724000825-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a short clinical risk management implementation (Short CRiMI) questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"Nikoloz Gambashidze ,&nbsp;Matthias Marsall ,&nbsp;Martina Schmiedhofer ,&nbsp;Karl Blum ,&nbsp;Hannah Roesner ,&nbsp;Reinhard Strametz ,&nbsp;Matthias Weigl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Clinical Risk Management (CRM) is an important instrument to continuously improve safety of health care delivery. In Germany, hospitals are required by law to implement CRM and incidence reporting systems. Since 2010, nation-wide surveys have been conducted periodically to evaluate implementation of CRM in hospitals. The instrument used in these surveys is constantly being updated to reflect previous experiences, as well as to adapt to ongoing trends and developments in CRM practices. The survey instrument used in 2022 consisted of up to 200 items and took up to an hour to complete. In this study, we aimed to develop a short instrument to measure the level of CRM implementation in hospitals, evaluate its psychometric properties, and to offer benchmarking data for health care facilities of different sizes.</p><p>We used data collected in 2022 as part of KHaSiMiR study, employing a cross-sectional self-reported online survey. The hospital administrations were invited to designate one CRM manager to participate in the study. Out of 1,411 general hospitals invited, 401 responses were collected (response rate of 28%). After removing the cases with excessive missings, we imputed remaining missing values using multiple imputation, and split the resulting sample (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->362) in two halves (i.e., exploratory and testing subsamples). A principal component analysis was applied on the first subsample. We validated the resulting model using confirmatory factor analysis in the testing subsample. We evaluated internal consistency, and tested external validity of the established instrument using correlation analysis with two single-item measures: subjective evaluation of CRM implementation compared to similar organizations and compared to own ideal level. The principal component analysis included 45 items from the full instrument. The analysis resulted in a three-factor model with 26 items. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the model demonstrated acceptable fit with the data according to the commonly used fit indices: Chi<sup>2</sup>/df<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.36, CFI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.941, TLI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.930, RMSEA<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.045 (90% CI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.032–0.056), SRMR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.049. Cronbach’s alpha of all three factors was good (&gt;0.70). All three factors had statistically significant positive correlations with each other (0.359–0.497) and with the two single items (0.282–0.532). None of the correlations were high enough (&gt;0.7) to indicate multicollinearity.</p><p>The proposed short clinical risk management implementation (Short CRiMI) questionnaire is psychometrically valid and can be used to rapidly evaluate CRM implementation in hospitals. Further research can provide evidence of its external validity and association with quality and safety outcomes. Benchmarking data can be used to compare the results with the data from the most recent Germany-wide survey.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000825/pdfft?md5=dfe2f8caeb3022ad8985506e1d7cc388&pid=1-s2.0-S1865921724000825-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000825\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000825","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床风险管理(CRM)是持续改善医疗服务安全性的重要手段。在德国,法律要求医院实施 CRM 和事故报告系统。自 2010 年起,德国定期在全国范围内开展调查,以评估医院实施 CRM 的情况。这些调查所使用的工具会不断更新,以反映以往的经验,并适应客户关系管理实践的持续趋势和发展。2022 年使用的调查工具由多达 200 个项目组成,填写时间长达一个小时。在这项研究中,我们旨在开发一种简便的工具来衡量医院实施客户关系管理的水平,评估其心理测量特性,并为不同规模的医疗机构提供基准数据。我们使用了 2022 年作为 KHaSiMiR 研究一部分收集的数据,采用了横断面自我报告在线调查的方法。医院行政部门受邀指定一名客户关系管理经理参与研究。在受邀的 1411 家综合医院中,共收集到 401 份回复(回复率为 28%)。在剔除过多的缺失案例后,我们使用多重估算法对剩余的缺失值进行估算,并将所得样本(n=362)分成两半(即探索子样本和测试子样本)。我们对第一个子样本进行了主成分分析。我们在测试子样本中使用确认性因子分析验证了由此产生的模型。我们评估了内部一致性,并通过与两个单项测量进行相关分析,检验了所建立工具的外部有效性:与同类组织相比客户关系管理实施情况的主观评价,以及与自身理想水平相比客户关系管理实施情况的主观评价。主成分分析包括整个工具中的 45 个项目。分析得出了一个包含 26 个项目的三因素模型。在确认性因子分析中,根据常用的拟合指数,该模型与数据的拟合程度可以接受:Chi2/df=1.36,CFI=0.941,TLI=0.930,RMSEA=0.045(90% CI=0.032-0.056),SRMR=0.049。三个因子的 Cronbach's alpha 均良好(大于 0.70)。所有三个因子之间(0.359-0.497)以及与两个单项之间(0.282-0.532)都存在统计学意义上的正相关。相关性都不高(>0.7),不足以表明存在多重共线性。所提出的临床风险管理实施简易问卷(Short CRiMI)在心理测量学上是有效的,可用于快速评估医院的 CRM 实施情况。进一步的研究可以为其外部有效性以及与质量和安全结果的关联性提供证据。基准数据可用于将结果与最新的全德国调查数据进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and validation of a short clinical risk management implementation (Short CRiMI) questionnaire

Clinical Risk Management (CRM) is an important instrument to continuously improve safety of health care delivery. In Germany, hospitals are required by law to implement CRM and incidence reporting systems. Since 2010, nation-wide surveys have been conducted periodically to evaluate implementation of CRM in hospitals. The instrument used in these surveys is constantly being updated to reflect previous experiences, as well as to adapt to ongoing trends and developments in CRM practices. The survey instrument used in 2022 consisted of up to 200 items and took up to an hour to complete. In this study, we aimed to develop a short instrument to measure the level of CRM implementation in hospitals, evaluate its psychometric properties, and to offer benchmarking data for health care facilities of different sizes.

We used data collected in 2022 as part of KHaSiMiR study, employing a cross-sectional self-reported online survey. The hospital administrations were invited to designate one CRM manager to participate in the study. Out of 1,411 general hospitals invited, 401 responses were collected (response rate of 28%). After removing the cases with excessive missings, we imputed remaining missing values using multiple imputation, and split the resulting sample (n = 362) in two halves (i.e., exploratory and testing subsamples). A principal component analysis was applied on the first subsample. We validated the resulting model using confirmatory factor analysis in the testing subsample. We evaluated internal consistency, and tested external validity of the established instrument using correlation analysis with two single-item measures: subjective evaluation of CRM implementation compared to similar organizations and compared to own ideal level. The principal component analysis included 45 items from the full instrument. The analysis resulted in a three-factor model with 26 items. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the model demonstrated acceptable fit with the data according to the commonly used fit indices: Chi2/df = 1.36, CFI = 0.941, TLI = 0.930, RMSEA = 0.045 (90% CI = 0.032–0.056), SRMR = 0.049. Cronbach’s alpha of all three factors was good (>0.70). All three factors had statistically significant positive correlations with each other (0.359–0.497) and with the two single items (0.282–0.532). None of the correlations were high enough (>0.7) to indicate multicollinearity.

The proposed short clinical risk management implementation (Short CRiMI) questionnaire is psychometrically valid and can be used to rapidly evaluate CRM implementation in hospitals. Further research can provide evidence of its external validity and association with quality and safety outcomes. Benchmarking data can be used to compare the results with the data from the most recent Germany-wide survey.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Psychosexual dysfunction in male patients with cannabis dependence and synthetic cannabinoid dependence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1