统一加拿大健康测量调查各周期的异质负荷评估:变量选择和计算方法。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Reports Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.25318/82-003-x202400500002-eng
Errol M Thomson, Mike Walker, Brittany Halverson-Duncan
{"title":"统一加拿大健康测量调查各周期的异质负荷评估:变量选择和计算方法。","authors":"Errol M Thomson, Mike Walker, Brittany Halverson-Duncan","doi":"10.25318/82-003-x202400500002-eng","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The availability of measures to operationalize allostatic load - the cumulative toll on the body of responding to stressor demands - in population health surveys may differ across years or surveys, hampering analyses on the entire sampled population. Here, impacts of variable selection and calculation method were evaluated to generate an allostatic load index applicable across all cycles of the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from CHMS cycles 1 to 4 were used to compare allostatic load scores when replacing the most prevalent risk factor, waist-to-hip ratio - available in cycles 1 to 4 but not 5 and 6 - with body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist circumference within BMI groups (classified as normal, overweight, or obese), or waist-to-height ratio. Indexes were generated using clinical or sex-specific empirically defined risk thresholds and as count-based or continuous scores. Logistic regression models that included age and sex were used to relate each potential index to socioeconomic indicators (educational attainment, household income).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the variables assessed, waist-to-height ratio and waist circumference were closest to waist-to-hip ratio according to an individual's percentile ranking and in classifying \"at risk\" using either clinical or empirically defined cut-offs. Allostatic load profiles generated using waist-to-height ratios most closely resembled profiles constructed using waist-to-hip ratios. Sex-dependent associations with educational attainment and household income were maintained across constructs whether indexes were count-based or continuous.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Allostatic load profiles and associations with socioeconomic indicators were robust to variable substitution and method of calculation, supporting the use of a harmonized index across survey cycles to assess the cumulative toll on health of stressor exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":49196,"journal":{"name":"Health Reports","volume":"35 5","pages":"16-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harmonizing the assessment of allostatic load across cycles of the Canadian Health Measures Survey: Variable selection and calculation method.\",\"authors\":\"Errol M Thomson, Mike Walker, Brittany Halverson-Duncan\",\"doi\":\"10.25318/82-003-x202400500002-eng\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The availability of measures to operationalize allostatic load - the cumulative toll on the body of responding to stressor demands - in population health surveys may differ across years or surveys, hampering analyses on the entire sampled population. Here, impacts of variable selection and calculation method were evaluated to generate an allostatic load index applicable across all cycles of the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from CHMS cycles 1 to 4 were used to compare allostatic load scores when replacing the most prevalent risk factor, waist-to-hip ratio - available in cycles 1 to 4 but not 5 and 6 - with body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist circumference within BMI groups (classified as normal, overweight, or obese), or waist-to-height ratio. Indexes were generated using clinical or sex-specific empirically defined risk thresholds and as count-based or continuous scores. Logistic regression models that included age and sex were used to relate each potential index to socioeconomic indicators (educational attainment, household income).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the variables assessed, waist-to-height ratio and waist circumference were closest to waist-to-hip ratio according to an individual's percentile ranking and in classifying \\\"at risk\\\" using either clinical or empirically defined cut-offs. Allostatic load profiles generated using waist-to-height ratios most closely resembled profiles constructed using waist-to-hip ratios. Sex-dependent associations with educational attainment and household income were maintained across constructs whether indexes were count-based or continuous.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Allostatic load profiles and associations with socioeconomic indicators were robust to variable substitution and method of calculation, supporting the use of a harmonized index across survey cycles to assess the cumulative toll on health of stressor exposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Reports\",\"volume\":\"35 5\",\"pages\":\"16-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202400500002-eng\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202400500002-eng","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在不同年份或不同调查的人群健康调查中,可用于操作异位负荷(应对压力需求对身体造成的累积损失)的测量方法可能会有所不同,从而影响对整个抽样人群的分析。在此,我们对变量选择和计算方法的影响进行了评估,以生成适用于加拿大健康测量调查(CHMS)所有周期的静态负荷指数:方法:使用 CHMS 第 1 至 4 周期的数据,比较用体重指数 (BMI)、腰围、BMI 组别内的腰围(分为正常、超重或肥胖)或腰围与身高的比率替代最普遍的风险因素腰臀比时的静力负荷得分。这些指数采用临床或性别特异性经验定义的风险阈值,并以计数或连续得分的形式生成。使用包括年龄和性别在内的逻辑回归模型将每个潜在指数与社会经济指标(教育程度、家庭收入)联系起来:结果:在所评估的变量中,腰围与身高的比率和腰围在个人百分位数排名中最接近腰臀比,在使用临床或经验定义的临界值进行 "高危 "分类时也最接近腰臀比。使用腰围-身高比生成的静力负荷曲线与使用腰围-臀围比构建的曲线最为相似。无论指数是基于计数还是连续的,性别与教育程度和家庭收入的相关性在所有结构中都保持不变:静力负荷曲线以及与社会经济指标的联系不受变量替代和计算方法的影响,支持在不同调查周期使用统一的指数来评估压力暴露对健康的累积影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Harmonizing the assessment of allostatic load across cycles of the Canadian Health Measures Survey: Variable selection and calculation method.

Background: The availability of measures to operationalize allostatic load - the cumulative toll on the body of responding to stressor demands - in population health surveys may differ across years or surveys, hampering analyses on the entire sampled population. Here, impacts of variable selection and calculation method were evaluated to generate an allostatic load index applicable across all cycles of the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS).

Methods: Data from CHMS cycles 1 to 4 were used to compare allostatic load scores when replacing the most prevalent risk factor, waist-to-hip ratio - available in cycles 1 to 4 but not 5 and 6 - with body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist circumference within BMI groups (classified as normal, overweight, or obese), or waist-to-height ratio. Indexes were generated using clinical or sex-specific empirically defined risk thresholds and as count-based or continuous scores. Logistic regression models that included age and sex were used to relate each potential index to socioeconomic indicators (educational attainment, household income).

Results: Of the variables assessed, waist-to-height ratio and waist circumference were closest to waist-to-hip ratio according to an individual's percentile ranking and in classifying "at risk" using either clinical or empirically defined cut-offs. Allostatic load profiles generated using waist-to-height ratios most closely resembled profiles constructed using waist-to-hip ratios. Sex-dependent associations with educational attainment and household income were maintained across constructs whether indexes were count-based or continuous.

Interpretation: Allostatic load profiles and associations with socioeconomic indicators were robust to variable substitution and method of calculation, supporting the use of a harmonized index across survey cycles to assess the cumulative toll on health of stressor exposure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Reports
Health Reports PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Health Reports publishes original research on diverse topics related to understanding and improving the health of populations and the delivery of health care. We publish studies based on analyses of Canadian national/provincial representative surveys or Canadian national/provincial administrative databases, as well as results of international comparative health research. Health Reports encourages the sharing of methodological information among those engaged in the analysis of health surveys or administrative databases. Use of the most current data available is advised for all submissions.
期刊最新文献
Mental health and access to support among 2SLGBTQ+ youth. Updated breast cancer costs for women by disease stage and phase of care using population-based databases. Child care for young children with disabilities. From BpTRU to OMRON: The impact of changing automated blood pressure measurement devices on adult population estimates of blood pressure and hypertension. Trends in household food insecurity from the Canadian Community Health Survey, 2017 to 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1