人脸识别系统中若干分类算法的性能评估

Michael Olumuyiwa Adio, Ogunmakinde Jimoh Ogunwuyi, Mayowa Oyedepo Oyediran, Adebimpe Omolayo Esan, Olufikayo Adepoju Adedapo
{"title":"人脸识别系统中若干分类算法的性能评估","authors":"Michael Olumuyiwa Adio, Ogunmakinde Jimoh Ogunwuyi, Mayowa Oyedepo Oyediran, Adebimpe Omolayo Esan, Olufikayo Adepoju Adedapo","doi":"10.53982/ajerd.2024.0701.17-j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Facial Recognition (FR) has been an active area of research and has diverse applicable environment, it continues to be a challenging research topic. With the development of image processing and pattern recognition technology, there are many challenges in machine learning to select the appropriate classification algorithms, most especially in the area of classification of extracted features to have low classification time, high sensitivity and accuracy of the classification algorithms, so it is very important to explore the performance of different algorithms in image classification. The three selected supervised learning classification algorithms: Learning Vector Quantization (LVQ), Relevance Vector Machine (RVM), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) performance were evaluated so as to know the most effective out of the selected algorithms for facial images classification. The development of the system has four stages, the first stage is image acquisition and 180 images were taken by digital camera under same illumination and light colour background. The second stage is pre-processing to improve the images data by suppressing unwilling distortion; grayscale and normalization were used for image pre-processing. The third stage is feature extraction; Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) is adopted for this purpose. While the fourth stage is face recognition classification, Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) was used to test the performance of each the three algorithms. However the Learning Vector Quantization algorithm, Relevance Vector Machine and Support Vector Machine performance have not been compared together to the most effective out of the three algorithms in term of False Positive Rate, Sensitivity, Specificity, Precision, Accuracy and Computation Time. Hence, this work evaluated the performance of the Learning Vector Quantization; Relevance Vector Machine and Support Vector Machine classification algorithms in facial recognition system and Support Vector Machine outwit the other two algorithms in facial recognition in term of specificity, recognition time and recognition accuracy at different threshold.","PeriodicalId":503569,"journal":{"name":"ABUAD Journal of Engineering Research and Development (AJERD)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of Some Selected Classification Algorithms in a Facial Recognition System\",\"authors\":\"Michael Olumuyiwa Adio, Ogunmakinde Jimoh Ogunwuyi, Mayowa Oyedepo Oyediran, Adebimpe Omolayo Esan, Olufikayo Adepoju Adedapo\",\"doi\":\"10.53982/ajerd.2024.0701.17-j\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Facial Recognition (FR) has been an active area of research and has diverse applicable environment, it continues to be a challenging research topic. With the development of image processing and pattern recognition technology, there are many challenges in machine learning to select the appropriate classification algorithms, most especially in the area of classification of extracted features to have low classification time, high sensitivity and accuracy of the classification algorithms, so it is very important to explore the performance of different algorithms in image classification. The three selected supervised learning classification algorithms: Learning Vector Quantization (LVQ), Relevance Vector Machine (RVM), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) performance were evaluated so as to know the most effective out of the selected algorithms for facial images classification. The development of the system has four stages, the first stage is image acquisition and 180 images were taken by digital camera under same illumination and light colour background. The second stage is pre-processing to improve the images data by suppressing unwilling distortion; grayscale and normalization were used for image pre-processing. The third stage is feature extraction; Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) is adopted for this purpose. While the fourth stage is face recognition classification, Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) was used to test the performance of each the three algorithms. However the Learning Vector Quantization algorithm, Relevance Vector Machine and Support Vector Machine performance have not been compared together to the most effective out of the three algorithms in term of False Positive Rate, Sensitivity, Specificity, Precision, Accuracy and Computation Time. Hence, this work evaluated the performance of the Learning Vector Quantization; Relevance Vector Machine and Support Vector Machine classification algorithms in facial recognition system and Support Vector Machine outwit the other two algorithms in facial recognition in term of specificity, recognition time and recognition accuracy at different threshold.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ABUAD Journal of Engineering Research and Development (AJERD)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ABUAD Journal of Engineering Research and Development (AJERD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53982/ajerd.2024.0701.17-j\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABUAD Journal of Engineering Research and Development (AJERD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53982/ajerd.2024.0701.17-j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人脸识别(FR)一直是一个活跃的研究领域,具有多样化的适用环境,它仍然是一个具有挑战性的研究课题。随着图像处理和模式识别技术的发展,在机器学习中选择合适的分类算法面临诸多挑战,尤其是在提取特征分类领域,要有分类时间短、灵敏度高、准确率高的分类算法,因此探索不同算法在图像分类中的性能非常重要。我们选择了三种监督学习分类算法:对学习矢量量化(LVQ)、相关性矢量机(RVM)和支持矢量机(SVM)的性能进行了评估,以了解所选算法中最有效的面部图像分类算法。该系统的开发分为四个阶段:第一阶段是图像采集,在相同光照和浅色背景下用数码相机拍摄了 180 幅图像。第二阶段是预处理,通过抑制不情愿的失真来改进图像数据;图像预处理使用了灰度和归一化技术。第三阶段是特征提取;为此采用了离散余弦变换(DCT)。第四阶段是人脸识别分类,使用接收器工作特性(ROC)来测试三种算法的性能。然而,学习矢量量化算法、相关性矢量机和支持矢量机的性能还没有在误报率、灵敏度、特异性、精确度、准确性和计算时间方面与三种算法中最有效的算法进行比较。因此,这项工作评估了学习矢量量化、相关性矢量机和支持矢量机分类算法在人脸识别系统中的性能,在不同阈值下,支持矢量机在特异性、识别时间和识别准确率方面优于其他两种算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance Evaluation of Some Selected Classification Algorithms in a Facial Recognition System
Facial Recognition (FR) has been an active area of research and has diverse applicable environment, it continues to be a challenging research topic. With the development of image processing and pattern recognition technology, there are many challenges in machine learning to select the appropriate classification algorithms, most especially in the area of classification of extracted features to have low classification time, high sensitivity and accuracy of the classification algorithms, so it is very important to explore the performance of different algorithms in image classification. The three selected supervised learning classification algorithms: Learning Vector Quantization (LVQ), Relevance Vector Machine (RVM), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) performance were evaluated so as to know the most effective out of the selected algorithms for facial images classification. The development of the system has four stages, the first stage is image acquisition and 180 images were taken by digital camera under same illumination and light colour background. The second stage is pre-processing to improve the images data by suppressing unwilling distortion; grayscale and normalization were used for image pre-processing. The third stage is feature extraction; Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) is adopted for this purpose. While the fourth stage is face recognition classification, Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) was used to test the performance of each the three algorithms. However the Learning Vector Quantization algorithm, Relevance Vector Machine and Support Vector Machine performance have not been compared together to the most effective out of the three algorithms in term of False Positive Rate, Sensitivity, Specificity, Precision, Accuracy and Computation Time. Hence, this work evaluated the performance of the Learning Vector Quantization; Relevance Vector Machine and Support Vector Machine classification algorithms in facial recognition system and Support Vector Machine outwit the other two algorithms in facial recognition in term of specificity, recognition time and recognition accuracy at different threshold.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Models Development for Prediction of Blast Efficiency and Total Charge in a Typical Quarry Mitigating the Impact of Climate Change on Vegetable Farming: An Evaluation of Artificial Planting Technique Investigating Internal Heat Exchanger Performance in a VCR System with a CO2 and LPG Refrigerant Mixture Enhancing Social Engagement among Online Learners Using AI-Driven Tools: National Open University of Nigeria Learners' Perspective Elevating Tanzania's Tourism: Integrating GIS, AR and AI for Immersive Exploration and Promotion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1