评估远程医疗接受者的知识、观念和准备情况:横断面研究

Iman Hamdan, Enas Alkhader
{"title":"评估远程医疗接受者的知识、观念和准备情况:横断面研究","authors":"Iman Hamdan, Enas Alkhader","doi":"10.3897/pharmacia.71.e122134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The current study aimed to assess the knowledge and perceptions of telemedicine recipients. Secondly, to evaluate their readiness towards adopting telemedicine in clinical settings.\n Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted in Jordan and designed to show the demographics of participants. The questionnaire was piloted for validity and reliability to achieve the aim of the study, and a collective of 420 participants were recruited.\n Findings: Multiple regression analysis conducted showed that telemedicine services were significant at a level of α ≤ 0.05. Whereas the Pearson’s correlation of the dependent and independent variables was also significant at a level of α ≤ 0.05 as a function of age, working status, and income.\n Conclusions: Regardless of the fact that participants showed a limited knowledge of telemedicine services, most of the participants expressed positive perceptions towards telemedicine services and its adoption in the clinical settings.","PeriodicalId":508564,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing knowledge, perceptions, and readiness of telemedicine recipients: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Iman Hamdan, Enas Alkhader\",\"doi\":\"10.3897/pharmacia.71.e122134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The current study aimed to assess the knowledge and perceptions of telemedicine recipients. Secondly, to evaluate their readiness towards adopting telemedicine in clinical settings.\\n Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted in Jordan and designed to show the demographics of participants. The questionnaire was piloted for validity and reliability to achieve the aim of the study, and a collective of 420 participants were recruited.\\n Findings: Multiple regression analysis conducted showed that telemedicine services were significant at a level of α ≤ 0.05. Whereas the Pearson’s correlation of the dependent and independent variables was also significant at a level of α ≤ 0.05 as a function of age, working status, and income.\\n Conclusions: Regardless of the fact that participants showed a limited knowledge of telemedicine services, most of the participants expressed positive perceptions towards telemedicine services and its adoption in the clinical settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.71.e122134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/pharmacia.71.e122134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估远程医疗接受者的知识和看法。其次,评估他们在临床环境中采用远程医疗的准备情况。方法:采用横断面调查研究:在约旦进行了一项横断面调查研究,旨在了解参与者的人口统计学特征。为达到研究目的,对问卷的有效性和可靠性进行了试点,共招募了 420 名参与者。研究结果进行的多元回归分析表明,远程医疗服务在 α ≤ 0.05 的水平上具有显著性。而因变量和自变量之间的皮尔逊相关性在年龄、工作状况和收入的作用下,在 α ≤ 0.05 的水平上也是显著的。结论尽管参与者对远程医疗服务的了解有限,但大多数参与者对远程医疗服务及其在临床环境中的应用表示了积极的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing knowledge, perceptions, and readiness of telemedicine recipients: A cross-sectional study
Objectives: The current study aimed to assess the knowledge and perceptions of telemedicine recipients. Secondly, to evaluate their readiness towards adopting telemedicine in clinical settings. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted in Jordan and designed to show the demographics of participants. The questionnaire was piloted for validity and reliability to achieve the aim of the study, and a collective of 420 participants were recruited. Findings: Multiple regression analysis conducted showed that telemedicine services were significant at a level of α ≤ 0.05. Whereas the Pearson’s correlation of the dependent and independent variables was also significant at a level of α ≤ 0.05 as a function of age, working status, and income. Conclusions: Regardless of the fact that participants showed a limited knowledge of telemedicine services, most of the participants expressed positive perceptions towards telemedicine services and its adoption in the clinical settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of therapeutic effectiveness of antituberculosis injection based on conversion time in drug-resistant tuberculosis Effect of Camellia flava (Pitard) Sealy flower extract on the degeneration of Islets of Langerhans and insulin resistance in alloxan-induced hyperglycemia model on Swiss albino mice Comparative quantitative profiling of rare justicidin B in in vitro cultivated Linum species Design and optimization of pantoprazole sodium mucoadhesive hydrogel microcapsules for the healing of peptic ulcers Development and evaluation of curcumin-loaded vesicular carriers: impact of formulation variables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1