日调节水电站如何减少对水文系统的影响?黄河上游案例研究

IF 2.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 WATER RESOURCES Hydrology Research Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.2166/nh.2024.031
Xue Yang, Fengnian Li, Shi Li, Xiaohua Fu, Jungang Luo, Ganggang Zuo, Chong-Yu Xu
{"title":"日调节水电站如何减少对水文系统的影响?黄河上游案例研究","authors":"Xue Yang, Fengnian Li, Shi Li, Xiaohua Fu, Jungang Luo, Ganggang Zuo, Chong-Yu Xu","doi":"10.2166/nh.2024.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The regulation of hydropower stations has profoundly altered river flow patterns. While studies have extensively assessed the impact of large or multiyear regulated hydropower stations on hydrological regimes using indicators of hydrological alteration (IHA) and range of variability approach (RVA), the impact of daily regulation hydropower stations has received comparatively less attention. This study aims to evaluate the influence of daily regulation hydropower stations on hydrological regime changes. The analysis focuses on the upper Yellow River region in China, which houses cascade hydropower stations, utilizing daily runoff data from the Guide hydrological station spanning from 1954 to 2020. The Mann–Kendall test revealed 27 of 32 IHAs with a significant trend when considering the operation of the multiyear regulated hydropower station (Longyangxia). However, this number decreased to 18 IHAs when daily regulation hydropower stations (Laxiwa and Nina) were included. Evaluation using the RVA method indicated that only 46.87% of IHAs showed high alterations from the natural regime when considering the operation of daily regulation hydropower stations, a decrease from 75.00% when solely considering Longyangxia. Findings suggest that daily regulation hydropower stations can effectively mitigate the adverse effects of multiyear regulated hydropower stations, bringing the hydrological regime closer to a natural state.","PeriodicalId":13096,"journal":{"name":"Hydrology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does the daily regulation hydropower station reduce the hydrological regime impact? A case study in upper Yellow River\",\"authors\":\"Xue Yang, Fengnian Li, Shi Li, Xiaohua Fu, Jungang Luo, Ganggang Zuo, Chong-Yu Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/nh.2024.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The regulation of hydropower stations has profoundly altered river flow patterns. While studies have extensively assessed the impact of large or multiyear regulated hydropower stations on hydrological regimes using indicators of hydrological alteration (IHA) and range of variability approach (RVA), the impact of daily regulation hydropower stations has received comparatively less attention. This study aims to evaluate the influence of daily regulation hydropower stations on hydrological regime changes. The analysis focuses on the upper Yellow River region in China, which houses cascade hydropower stations, utilizing daily runoff data from the Guide hydrological station spanning from 1954 to 2020. The Mann–Kendall test revealed 27 of 32 IHAs with a significant trend when considering the operation of the multiyear regulated hydropower station (Longyangxia). However, this number decreased to 18 IHAs when daily regulation hydropower stations (Laxiwa and Nina) were included. Evaluation using the RVA method indicated that only 46.87% of IHAs showed high alterations from the natural regime when considering the operation of daily regulation hydropower stations, a decrease from 75.00% when solely considering Longyangxia. Findings suggest that daily regulation hydropower stations can effectively mitigate the adverse effects of multiyear regulated hydropower stations, bringing the hydrological regime closer to a natural state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrology Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2024.031\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrology Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2024.031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水电站的调节深刻地改变了河流的流量模式。虽然已有研究利用水文变化指标 (IHA) 和变率范围法 (RVA) 广泛评估了大型或多年调节水电站对水文过程的影响,但对日调节水电站的影响的关注相对较少。本研究旨在评估日调节水电站对水文过程变化的影响。分析以中国黄河上游地区为重点,利用贵德水文站从 1954 年到 2020 年的日径流量数据,该地区建有梯级水电站。Mann-Kendall 检验显示,考虑到多年调节水电站(龙羊峡)的运行,32 个 IHA 中有 27 个具有显著趋势。但是,如果将日调节水电站(拉西瓦水电站和尼那水电站)包括在内,这一数字则下降到 18 个 IHA。使用 RVA 方法进行的评估表明,当考虑到日调节水电站的运行时,只有 46.87% 的 IHA 与自然状态相比变化较大,比仅考虑龙羊峡时的 75.00% 有所下降。研究结果表明,日调节水电站可以有效缓解多年调节水电站的不利影响,使水文状态更接近自然状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How does the daily regulation hydropower station reduce the hydrological regime impact? A case study in upper Yellow River
The regulation of hydropower stations has profoundly altered river flow patterns. While studies have extensively assessed the impact of large or multiyear regulated hydropower stations on hydrological regimes using indicators of hydrological alteration (IHA) and range of variability approach (RVA), the impact of daily regulation hydropower stations has received comparatively less attention. This study aims to evaluate the influence of daily regulation hydropower stations on hydrological regime changes. The analysis focuses on the upper Yellow River region in China, which houses cascade hydropower stations, utilizing daily runoff data from the Guide hydrological station spanning from 1954 to 2020. The Mann–Kendall test revealed 27 of 32 IHAs with a significant trend when considering the operation of the multiyear regulated hydropower station (Longyangxia). However, this number decreased to 18 IHAs when daily regulation hydropower stations (Laxiwa and Nina) were included. Evaluation using the RVA method indicated that only 46.87% of IHAs showed high alterations from the natural regime when considering the operation of daily regulation hydropower stations, a decrease from 75.00% when solely considering Longyangxia. Findings suggest that daily regulation hydropower stations can effectively mitigate the adverse effects of multiyear regulated hydropower stations, bringing the hydrological regime closer to a natural state.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrology Research
Hydrology Research WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Hydrology Research provides international coverage on all aspects of hydrology in its widest sense, and welcomes the submission of papers from across the subject. While emphasis is placed on studies of the hydrological cycle, the Journal also covers the physics and chemistry of water. Hydrology Research is intended to be a link between basic hydrological research and the practical application of scientific results within the broad field of water management.
期刊最新文献
Research on the coupling effect of water security and socio-economy in five economic zones of Sichuan Province, China How does the daily regulation hydropower station reduce the hydrological regime impact? A case study in upper Yellow River The phenomenon of drought in Ethiopia: Historical evolution and climatic forcing A novel deep learning rainfall–runoff model based on Transformer combined with base flow separation Evaluation of water shortage and instream flows of shared rivers in South Korea according to the dam operations in North Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1