Tenzing 7 输送导管在不同曲度指数下的性能表现

Manisha Koneru, Clint A. Badger, Fabio Settecase, Joey D English, Jaehyun Kim, Rajkamal S. Khangura, Warren T. Kim, Adam A. Dmytriw, M. Bhattacharyya, Jane Khalife, Pratit D. Patel, Ajith J. Thomas, Tudor G. Jovin, Daniel A. Tonetti, Hamza A. Shaikh
{"title":"Tenzing 7 输送导管在不同曲度指数下的性能表现","authors":"Manisha Koneru, Clint A. Badger, Fabio Settecase, Joey D English, Jaehyun Kim, Rajkamal S. Khangura, Warren T. Kim, Adam A. Dmytriw, M. Bhattacharyya, Jane Khalife, Pratit D. Patel, Ajith J. Thomas, Tudor G. Jovin, Daniel A. Tonetti, Hamza A. Shaikh","doi":"10.1161/svin.124.001351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Early clinical experience with the Tenzing 7 delivery catheter (T7, Route 92 Medical, San Mateo, CA, USA) demonstrates high success rates for intracranial delivery of large bore aspiration catheters. Its soft, flexible, tapered tip mitigates the “ledge effect” that may cause resistance when navigating neurovascular devices through tortuous internal carotid arteries (ICAs) or other arterial branch origin variants. This study aims to characterize T7 performance across ICAs with varying tortuosities.\n \n \n \n \n A retrospective analysis was performed of prospectively collected data from patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with aspiration thrombectomy using T7 between January 2020 and July 2022 at 3 stroke centers. The ICA tortuosity index (TI) was derived from the ratio of actual to straight length measurements from anterior‐posterior and lateral projections during digital subtraction angiography. T7 success is defined as delivering the aspiration catheter to the face of the occlusion. Regression analysis between TI and T7 success was performed. Correlations were calculated between TI, ICA grading, puncture‐to‐reperfusion time, number of passes, and final modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction score. Significance was\n P\n \n \n ≤\n $ \\le $\n \n \n 0.05.\n \n \n \n \n \n Of 107 patients meeting inclusion, median age was 69 (interquartile range 60–81) years, and most occlusions were in the M1 segment (73/107; 68.2%). T7 rate of success was 95.3% (102/107), and there was no association between TI and T7 technical success (\n P\n  = 0.23). Greater TIs and cavernous ICA tortuosity grades were not correlated with worse intraprocedural outcomes (\n P\n >0.24).\n \n \n \n \n In our multicenter experience, T7 performed well even in highly tortuous extracranial vasculature. Successful aspiration catheter delivery and intraprocedural performance were consistent irrespective of ICA tortuosity. Our findings support the use of T7 in aspiration endovascular thrombectomy for acute stroke for patients with tortuous extracranial vasculature.\n","PeriodicalId":21977,"journal":{"name":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","volume":"54 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tenzing 7 Delivery Catheter Performance Across Tortuosity Indices\",\"authors\":\"Manisha Koneru, Clint A. Badger, Fabio Settecase, Joey D English, Jaehyun Kim, Rajkamal S. Khangura, Warren T. Kim, Adam A. Dmytriw, M. Bhattacharyya, Jane Khalife, Pratit D. Patel, Ajith J. Thomas, Tudor G. Jovin, Daniel A. Tonetti, Hamza A. Shaikh\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/svin.124.001351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Early clinical experience with the Tenzing 7 delivery catheter (T7, Route 92 Medical, San Mateo, CA, USA) demonstrates high success rates for intracranial delivery of large bore aspiration catheters. Its soft, flexible, tapered tip mitigates the “ledge effect” that may cause resistance when navigating neurovascular devices through tortuous internal carotid arteries (ICAs) or other arterial branch origin variants. This study aims to characterize T7 performance across ICAs with varying tortuosities.\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n A retrospective analysis was performed of prospectively collected data from patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with aspiration thrombectomy using T7 between January 2020 and July 2022 at 3 stroke centers. The ICA tortuosity index (TI) was derived from the ratio of actual to straight length measurements from anterior‐posterior and lateral projections during digital subtraction angiography. T7 success is defined as delivering the aspiration catheter to the face of the occlusion. Regression analysis between TI and T7 success was performed. Correlations were calculated between TI, ICA grading, puncture‐to‐reperfusion time, number of passes, and final modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction score. Significance was\\n P\\n \\n \\n ≤\\n $ \\\\le $\\n \\n \\n 0.05.\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n \\n Of 107 patients meeting inclusion, median age was 69 (interquartile range 60–81) years, and most occlusions were in the M1 segment (73/107; 68.2%). T7 rate of success was 95.3% (102/107), and there was no association between TI and T7 technical success (\\n P\\n  = 0.23). Greater TIs and cavernous ICA tortuosity grades were not correlated with worse intraprocedural outcomes (\\n P\\n >0.24).\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n In our multicenter experience, T7 performed well even in highly tortuous extracranial vasculature. Successful aspiration catheter delivery and intraprocedural performance were consistent irrespective of ICA tortuosity. Our findings support the use of T7 in aspiration endovascular thrombectomy for acute stroke for patients with tortuous extracranial vasculature.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":21977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology\",\"volume\":\"54 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.124.001351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.124.001351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Tenzing 7 输送导管(T7,Route 92 Medical,San Mateo,CA,USA)的早期临床经验表明,在颅内输送大口径抽吸导管的成功率很高。其柔软、灵活的锥形尖端可减轻 "壁架效应",这种效应可能会在导航神经血管设备通过迂曲的颈内动脉(ICA)或其他动脉分支源变异时造成阻力。本研究旨在描述 T7 在不同迂曲程度的颈内动脉中的性能。 我们对 3 个卒中中心 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 7 月间使用 T7 抽吸血栓切除术治疗的急性缺血性卒中患者的前瞻性数据进行了回顾性分析。ICA迂曲指数(TI)是根据数字减影血管造影时前后位和侧位投影的实际长度与直线长度测量值的比值得出的。T7成功定义为将抽吸导管送至闭塞面。对 TI 和 T7 成功率进行回归分析。计算了TI、ICA分级、穿刺至再灌注时间、穿刺次数和脑梗死改良治疗最终评分之间的相关性。显著性为 P≤ $\le $0.05。 在107名符合纳入条件的患者中,中位年龄为69岁(四分位间范围为60-81岁),大多数闭塞位于M1段(73/107;68.2%)。T7成功率为95.3%(102/107),TI与T7技术成功率之间没有关联(P = 0.23)。更大的TI和海绵状ICA迂曲等级与更差的术中结果无关(P >0.24)。 在我们的多中心经验中,T7 即使在高度迂曲的颅外血管中也表现良好。无论颅内动脉迂曲程度如何,抽吸导管的成功输送和术中表现都是一致的。我们的研究结果支持在颅外血管迂曲的急性卒中患者中使用 T7 抽吸血管内血栓切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tenzing 7 Delivery Catheter Performance Across Tortuosity Indices
Early clinical experience with the Tenzing 7 delivery catheter (T7, Route 92 Medical, San Mateo, CA, USA) demonstrates high success rates for intracranial delivery of large bore aspiration catheters. Its soft, flexible, tapered tip mitigates the “ledge effect” that may cause resistance when navigating neurovascular devices through tortuous internal carotid arteries (ICAs) or other arterial branch origin variants. This study aims to characterize T7 performance across ICAs with varying tortuosities. A retrospective analysis was performed of prospectively collected data from patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with aspiration thrombectomy using T7 between January 2020 and July 2022 at 3 stroke centers. The ICA tortuosity index (TI) was derived from the ratio of actual to straight length measurements from anterior‐posterior and lateral projections during digital subtraction angiography. T7 success is defined as delivering the aspiration catheter to the face of the occlusion. Regression analysis between TI and T7 success was performed. Correlations were calculated between TI, ICA grading, puncture‐to‐reperfusion time, number of passes, and final modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction score. Significance was P ≤ $ \le $ 0.05. Of 107 patients meeting inclusion, median age was 69 (interquartile range 60–81) years, and most occlusions were in the M1 segment (73/107; 68.2%). T7 rate of success was 95.3% (102/107), and there was no association between TI and T7 technical success ( P  = 0.23). Greater TIs and cavernous ICA tortuosity grades were not correlated with worse intraprocedural outcomes ( P >0.24). In our multicenter experience, T7 performed well even in highly tortuous extracranial vasculature. Successful aspiration catheter delivery and intraprocedural performance were consistent irrespective of ICA tortuosity. Our findings support the use of T7 in aspiration endovascular thrombectomy for acute stroke for patients with tortuous extracranial vasculature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prognostication Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Modified Hunt and Hess Grading Scale Intra‐arterial Selective Bevacizumab Administration in the Middle Meningeal Artery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: An Early Experience in 12 Hemispheres Sex Disparities in Mortality After Endovascular Therapy in Large Core Infarcts Predicting Recanalization Failure With Conventional Devices During Endovascular Treatment Related to Vessel Occlusion Antiplatelet Therapy and Platelet Activity Testing for Neurointerventional Procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1