高中学分制中科学选修课的趋势分析:聚焦化学 I 学科

Dong-Seon Shin
{"title":"高中学分制中科学选修课的趋势分析:聚焦化学 I 学科","authors":"Dong-Seon Shin","doi":"10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.9.859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives This study investigated and analyzed the tendency of students to choose subjects and the tendency of chemical academic achievement according to science subject selection in the high school credit system. \nMethods For six months, from March to August 2020, 339 sophomores of S High School located in Gyeongnam were surveyed and analyzed for their perception of subject selection. Among them, a questionnaire was devel-oped to find out the perception of the content of chemistry subjects, and a questionnaire was conducted on 78 people who agreed to participate in the study. In order to analyze the tendency of chemical academic achievement according to science subject selection in the high school credit system, descriptive statistics, cross-analysis, and nonparametric tests were performed with the SPSS 28 program. \nResults Students selected many of the science elective subjects in the order of 'Chem-Phys-Bio,' 'Chem-Phys-Earth,' and 'Chem-Bio-Earth.' In the content and concept of the Chemistry I subject, students were found to have difficulty understanding concepts such as 'mole,' 'chemical reaction formula,' 'orbital,' etc., and the 'Chem-Phys-Earth' subject group was found to have the most difficulty in understanding the concept of 'mole.' In addition, in the comparison of achievement by elective subject group, the 'Chem-Phys-Bio' subject group showed the highest chemical academic achievement and the 'Chem-Phys-Earth' subject group showed the low-est achievement. \nConclusions In the high school credit system, students chose the Science I course independently, but many stu-dents were found to have insufficient understanding of the basic concept of Chemistry I. Therefore, in terms of understanding the concept of chemistry, it is essential to design a teaching-learning process by level so that stu-dents can better understand the basic concept of Chemistry I in the high school credit system.","PeriodicalId":509731,"journal":{"name":"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Trends in Science Electives in the High School Credit System: Focusing on Chemistry I Subjects\",\"authors\":\"Dong-Seon Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.9.859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives This study investigated and analyzed the tendency of students to choose subjects and the tendency of chemical academic achievement according to science subject selection in the high school credit system. \\nMethods For six months, from March to August 2020, 339 sophomores of S High School located in Gyeongnam were surveyed and analyzed for their perception of subject selection. Among them, a questionnaire was devel-oped to find out the perception of the content of chemistry subjects, and a questionnaire was conducted on 78 people who agreed to participate in the study. In order to analyze the tendency of chemical academic achievement according to science subject selection in the high school credit system, descriptive statistics, cross-analysis, and nonparametric tests were performed with the SPSS 28 program. \\nResults Students selected many of the science elective subjects in the order of 'Chem-Phys-Bio,' 'Chem-Phys-Earth,' and 'Chem-Bio-Earth.' In the content and concept of the Chemistry I subject, students were found to have difficulty understanding concepts such as 'mole,' 'chemical reaction formula,' 'orbital,' etc., and the 'Chem-Phys-Earth' subject group was found to have the most difficulty in understanding the concept of 'mole.' In addition, in the comparison of achievement by elective subject group, the 'Chem-Phys-Bio' subject group showed the highest chemical academic achievement and the 'Chem-Phys-Earth' subject group showed the low-est achievement. \\nConclusions In the high school credit system, students chose the Science I course independently, but many stu-dents were found to have insufficient understanding of the basic concept of Chemistry I. Therefore, in terms of understanding the concept of chemistry, it is essential to design a teaching-learning process by level so that stu-dents can better understand the basic concept of Chemistry I in the high school credit system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.9.859\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.9.859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究调查并分析了高中学分制中学生根据理科选科情况进行选科的倾向和化学学业成绩的倾向。方法 在 2020 年 3 月至 8 月的 6 个月时间里,对庆尚南道 S 高中的 339 名高二学生进行了选科调查和分析。其中,为了解学生对化学科目内容的看法,编制了一份问卷,并对同意参与研究的 78 人进行了问卷调查。为了分析高中学分制下理科选修科目对化学学业成绩的影响,使用 SPSS 28 程序进行了描述性统计、交叉分析和非参数检验。结果 学生按照 "化学-物理-生物"、"化学-物理-地球 "和 "化学-生物-地球 "的顺序选择了许多理科选修科目。在 "化学Ⅰ"科目的内容和概念中,发现学生对 "摩尔"、"化学反应式"、"轨道 "等概念的理解存在困难,而 "化学-物理-地球 "科目组对 "摩尔 "概念的理解最为困难。此外,在选修科目组的成绩比较中,"化学-物理-生物 "科目组的化学学习成绩最高,而 "化学-物理-地球 "科目组的成绩最低。结论 在高中学分制中,学生自主选择理科Ⅰ课程,但发现很多学生对化学Ⅰ的基本概念理解不够,因此,在理解化学概念方面,有必要分层设计教学过程,使学生在高中学分制中更好地理解化学Ⅰ的基本概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of Trends in Science Electives in the High School Credit System: Focusing on Chemistry I Subjects
Objectives This study investigated and analyzed the tendency of students to choose subjects and the tendency of chemical academic achievement according to science subject selection in the high school credit system. Methods For six months, from March to August 2020, 339 sophomores of S High School located in Gyeongnam were surveyed and analyzed for their perception of subject selection. Among them, a questionnaire was devel-oped to find out the perception of the content of chemistry subjects, and a questionnaire was conducted on 78 people who agreed to participate in the study. In order to analyze the tendency of chemical academic achievement according to science subject selection in the high school credit system, descriptive statistics, cross-analysis, and nonparametric tests were performed with the SPSS 28 program. Results Students selected many of the science elective subjects in the order of 'Chem-Phys-Bio,' 'Chem-Phys-Earth,' and 'Chem-Bio-Earth.' In the content and concept of the Chemistry I subject, students were found to have difficulty understanding concepts such as 'mole,' 'chemical reaction formula,' 'orbital,' etc., and the 'Chem-Phys-Earth' subject group was found to have the most difficulty in understanding the concept of 'mole.' In addition, in the comparison of achievement by elective subject group, the 'Chem-Phys-Bio' subject group showed the highest chemical academic achievement and the 'Chem-Phys-Earth' subject group showed the low-est achievement. Conclusions In the high school credit system, students chose the Science I course independently, but many stu-dents were found to have insufficient understanding of the basic concept of Chemistry I. Therefore, in terms of understanding the concept of chemistry, it is essential to design a teaching-learning process by level so that stu-dents can better understand the basic concept of Chemistry I in the high school credit system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysing the Perception of Pre-service Teachers on the Infringement of Teachers Rights The Impact of Resilience and Traumatic Stress Coping on Burnout among Firefighters Research on children's aesthetic experiences in outdoor play and teachers' play support Climate change literacy and perception on climate change education according to early childhood teacher’s background variables The Meaning of Ritornello Variations in the Expression of Young Children’s Imagination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1