{"title":"农业院校创业的 SWOT 分析:德尔菲-模糊法和模糊分层法的应用","authors":"Somayeh Tohidyan Far, K. Rezaei-Moghaddam","doi":"10.1108/et-09-2023-0397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe present study aims to seek the strategic analysis of the entrepreneurship of agricultural colleges (AC).Design/methodology/approachIn terms of approach, this research was a combination of exploratory and hybrid methods. The present study was conducted in four stages. In the first stage, an open-ended questionnaire was designed to identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of entrepreneurship in AC (qualitative method). In the second stage, the Delphi-Fuzzy questionnaire was designed based on the results obtained from the first stage. In the third stage, the criteria of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of entrepreneurship of AC were analyzed based on the pairwise comparison (quantitative method) by the sample using a fuzzy hierarchical analysis process (FHAP). In the fourth stage, presented strategies were ranked based on pairwise comparison using FHAP.FindingsFrom the analysis of weaknesses, strengths, opportunities and threats facing AC for entrepreneurship, 12 strategies were presented in 4 groups of aggressive, conservative, competitive and defensive.Originality/valueThe literature review showed that no research has been done so far to identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats facing university entrepreneurship, especially AC. So the present study analyzes the weaknesses, strengths, opportunities and threats and proposes practical strategies for moving toward the formation of entrepreneurship AC. According to the gaps in providing SWOT of the AC, the results of this research can pave the way for policy makers and planners in this field.","PeriodicalId":503966,"journal":{"name":"Education + Training","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SWOT analysis of agricultural colleges for entrepreneurship: Delphi-Fuzzy and fuzzy hierarchical application\",\"authors\":\"Somayeh Tohidyan Far, K. Rezaei-Moghaddam\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/et-09-2023-0397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe present study aims to seek the strategic analysis of the entrepreneurship of agricultural colleges (AC).Design/methodology/approachIn terms of approach, this research was a combination of exploratory and hybrid methods. The present study was conducted in four stages. In the first stage, an open-ended questionnaire was designed to identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of entrepreneurship in AC (qualitative method). In the second stage, the Delphi-Fuzzy questionnaire was designed based on the results obtained from the first stage. In the third stage, the criteria of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of entrepreneurship of AC were analyzed based on the pairwise comparison (quantitative method) by the sample using a fuzzy hierarchical analysis process (FHAP). In the fourth stage, presented strategies were ranked based on pairwise comparison using FHAP.FindingsFrom the analysis of weaknesses, strengths, opportunities and threats facing AC for entrepreneurship, 12 strategies were presented in 4 groups of aggressive, conservative, competitive and defensive.Originality/valueThe literature review showed that no research has been done so far to identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats facing university entrepreneurship, especially AC. So the present study analyzes the weaknesses, strengths, opportunities and threats and proposes practical strategies for moving toward the formation of entrepreneurship AC. According to the gaps in providing SWOT of the AC, the results of this research can pave the way for policy makers and planners in this field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education + Training\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education + Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/et-09-2023-0397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education + Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/et-09-2023-0397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的本研究旨在寻求对农业院校(AC)创业精神的战略分析。设计/方法/途径在方法上,本研究是探索性方法和混合方法的结合。本研究分四个阶段进行。第一阶段,设计了一份开放式问卷,以确定 AC 创业的优势、劣势、机会和威胁(定性方法)。第二阶段,根据第一阶段的结果设计了德尔菲-模糊问卷。在第三阶段,使用模糊层次分析法(FHAP)对样本进行成对比较(定量法),分析 AC 创业的优势、劣势、机会和威胁标准。在第四阶段,根据 FHAP 的成对比较对所提出的战略进行了排序。研究结果通过对 AC 创业所面临的劣势、优势、机会和威胁的分析,提出了 12 项战略,分为进取型、保守型、竞争型和防御型 4 组。因此,本研究分析了弱势、优势、机会和威胁,并提出了切实可行的策略,以促进创业交流的形成。根据在提供交流中心 SWOT 方面存在的差距,本研究的结果可为该领域的政策制定者和规划者铺平道路。
SWOT analysis of agricultural colleges for entrepreneurship: Delphi-Fuzzy and fuzzy hierarchical application
PurposeThe present study aims to seek the strategic analysis of the entrepreneurship of agricultural colleges (AC).Design/methodology/approachIn terms of approach, this research was a combination of exploratory and hybrid methods. The present study was conducted in four stages. In the first stage, an open-ended questionnaire was designed to identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of entrepreneurship in AC (qualitative method). In the second stage, the Delphi-Fuzzy questionnaire was designed based on the results obtained from the first stage. In the third stage, the criteria of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of entrepreneurship of AC were analyzed based on the pairwise comparison (quantitative method) by the sample using a fuzzy hierarchical analysis process (FHAP). In the fourth stage, presented strategies were ranked based on pairwise comparison using FHAP.FindingsFrom the analysis of weaknesses, strengths, opportunities and threats facing AC for entrepreneurship, 12 strategies were presented in 4 groups of aggressive, conservative, competitive and defensive.Originality/valueThe literature review showed that no research has been done so far to identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats facing university entrepreneurship, especially AC. So the present study analyzes the weaknesses, strengths, opportunities and threats and proposes practical strategies for moving toward the formation of entrepreneurship AC. According to the gaps in providing SWOT of the AC, the results of this research can pave the way for policy makers and planners in this field.