反馈策略在一系列以交流为重点的病人护理模拟中的影响

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1002/jac5.1959
Hindu Rao Pharm.D., Richard Beuttler Psy.D., M.S., Madeline Dintzner Ph.D., Reza Taheri Pharm.D., MBA, Albert T. Bach Pharm.D., Neeloufar Fakourfar Pharm.D.
{"title":"反馈策略在一系列以交流为重点的病人护理模拟中的影响","authors":"Hindu Rao Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Richard Beuttler Psy.D., M.S.,&nbsp;Madeline Dintzner Ph.D.,&nbsp;Reza Taheri Pharm.D., MBA,&nbsp;Albert T. Bach Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Neeloufar Fakourfar Pharm.D.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Patient care simulations (PCS) and objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) allow pharmacy students to practice communication. Feedback can help improve communication, but the impact over time is not well understood.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study investigated the impact of a feedback strategy on pharmacy students' communication skills over three PCS. It also evaluated the alignment between students' self-scoring and faculty scoring.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Pharmacy students participated in three sessions (PCS1, OSCE, and PCS3) that were focused on the affective domain. Individualized numerical and narrative feedback was provided to students on their performance after PCS1. Students' communication was scored by faculty graders out of an 18-point validated rubric. Students self-scored their communication with the same rubric. Faculty and student scores were compared using a linear mixed effects model, and an intraclass correlation coefficient was used to measure agreement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In PCS1, 82 students scored an average of 15.41 ± 2.14 for faculty scores and 16.06 ± 1.55 for self-graded scores (0.36, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In the OSCE, 81 students had an average of 15.93 ± 1.86 for faculty scores and 16.45 ± 1.35 for self-graded scores (0.1, <i>p</i> = 0.18). In PCS3, 74 students scored an average of 15.22 ± 2.15 for faculty scores and 16.25 ± 1.44 for self-graded scores (0.14, <i>p</i> = 0.08). A correlation between faculty and student scores was seen for PCS1. Over the three sessions, no significant differences were found between student self-graded scores (<i>p</i> = 0.08), but faculty scores did differ, with the OSCE having higher scores than PCS3 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Many students with faculty-graded scores greater than 1 standard deviation below the mean scored themselves higher than faculty did.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Feedback after PCS1 did not significantly improve scores. Students with low faculty-graded scores frequently scored themselves higher indicating low self-awareness.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 6","pages":"563-569"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a feedback strategy in a series of communication-focused patient care simulations\",\"authors\":\"Hindu Rao Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Richard Beuttler Psy.D., M.S.,&nbsp;Madeline Dintzner Ph.D.,&nbsp;Reza Taheri Pharm.D., MBA,&nbsp;Albert T. Bach Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Neeloufar Fakourfar Pharm.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jac5.1959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patient care simulations (PCS) and objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) allow pharmacy students to practice communication. Feedback can help improve communication, but the impact over time is not well understood.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study investigated the impact of a feedback strategy on pharmacy students' communication skills over three PCS. It also evaluated the alignment between students' self-scoring and faculty scoring.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pharmacy students participated in three sessions (PCS1, OSCE, and PCS3) that were focused on the affective domain. Individualized numerical and narrative feedback was provided to students on their performance after PCS1. Students' communication was scored by faculty graders out of an 18-point validated rubric. Students self-scored their communication with the same rubric. Faculty and student scores were compared using a linear mixed effects model, and an intraclass correlation coefficient was used to measure agreement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In PCS1, 82 students scored an average of 15.41 ± 2.14 for faculty scores and 16.06 ± 1.55 for self-graded scores (0.36, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In the OSCE, 81 students had an average of 15.93 ± 1.86 for faculty scores and 16.45 ± 1.35 for self-graded scores (0.1, <i>p</i> = 0.18). In PCS3, 74 students scored an average of 15.22 ± 2.15 for faculty scores and 16.25 ± 1.44 for self-graded scores (0.14, <i>p</i> = 0.08). A correlation between faculty and student scores was seen for PCS1. Over the three sessions, no significant differences were found between student self-graded scores (<i>p</i> = 0.08), but faculty scores did differ, with the OSCE having higher scores than PCS3 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Many students with faculty-graded scores greater than 1 standard deviation below the mean scored themselves higher than faculty did.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Feedback after PCS1 did not significantly improve scores. Students with low faculty-graded scores frequently scored themselves higher indicating low self-awareness.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP\",\"volume\":\"7 6\",\"pages\":\"563-569\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.1959\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.1959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者护理模拟(PCS)和客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)使药剂学学生能够练习沟通。本研究调查了反馈策略对药学专业学生在三次 PCS 中沟通技能的影响,并评估了学生自我评分与教师评分之间的一致性。药剂学学生参加了三节课(PCS1、OSCE 和 PCS3),重点是情感领域。PCS1 结束后,对学生的表现进行了个性化的数字和文字反馈。学生的交流情况由教师评分员根据 18 分的有效评分标准进行评分。学生用同样的评分标准对自己的交流情况进行自我评分。采用线性混合效应模型对教师和学生的评分进行比较,并使用类内相关系数来衡量一致性。在 PCS1 中,82 名学生的教师评分平均为(15.41 ± 2.14)分,自我评分平均为(16.06 ± 1.55)分(0.36,P < 0.001)。在 OSCE 中,81 名学生的教师评分平均为(15.93 ± 1.86)分,自我评分平均为(16.45 ± 1.35)分(0.1,P = 0.18)。在 PCS3 中,74 名学生的教师评分平均为 15.22 ± 2.15,自我评分平均为 16.25 ± 1.44(0.14,p = 0.08)。在 PCS1 中,教师评分和学生评分之间存在相关性。在三节课中,学生自评分之间没有发现明显差异(p = 0.08),但教师评分确实存在差异,OSCE 比 PCS3 分数更高(p < 0.01)。许多教员评分低于平均值 1 个标准差以上的学生对自己的评分高于教员评分。教师评分较低的学生经常给自己打高分,这表明他们的自我意识较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of a feedback strategy in a series of communication-focused patient care simulations

Introduction

Patient care simulations (PCS) and objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) allow pharmacy students to practice communication. Feedback can help improve communication, but the impact over time is not well understood.

Objective

This study investigated the impact of a feedback strategy on pharmacy students' communication skills over three PCS. It also evaluated the alignment between students' self-scoring and faculty scoring.

Methods

Pharmacy students participated in three sessions (PCS1, OSCE, and PCS3) that were focused on the affective domain. Individualized numerical and narrative feedback was provided to students on their performance after PCS1. Students' communication was scored by faculty graders out of an 18-point validated rubric. Students self-scored their communication with the same rubric. Faculty and student scores were compared using a linear mixed effects model, and an intraclass correlation coefficient was used to measure agreement.

Results

In PCS1, 82 students scored an average of 15.41 ± 2.14 for faculty scores and 16.06 ± 1.55 for self-graded scores (0.36, p < 0.001). In the OSCE, 81 students had an average of 15.93 ± 1.86 for faculty scores and 16.45 ± 1.35 for self-graded scores (0.1, p = 0.18). In PCS3, 74 students scored an average of 15.22 ± 2.15 for faculty scores and 16.25 ± 1.44 for self-graded scores (0.14, p = 0.08). A correlation between faculty and student scores was seen for PCS1. Over the three sessions, no significant differences were found between student self-graded scores (p = 0.08), but faculty scores did differ, with the OSCE having higher scores than PCS3 (p < 0.01). Many students with faculty-graded scores greater than 1 standard deviation below the mean scored themselves higher than faculty did.

Conclusion

Feedback after PCS1 did not significantly improve scores. Students with low faculty-graded scores frequently scored themselves higher indicating low self-awareness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Response to Comment on “Falling pass rates on the North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination signal an emerging crisis for a growing number of pharmacy schools” Pharmacists should be held to high standards, not hindered by bright-line rules Comment on “Falling pass rates on the North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination signal an emerging crisis for a growing number of pharmacy schools” Assessing pharmacy students' HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prescribing knowledge, PrEP attitudes, and HIV-related stigma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1