潮汐点棒与河流点棒:综合三叠纪实例的露头、岩心和有线测井信息得出的主要特征

IF 1.9 3区 地球科学 Q1 GEOLOGY Depositional Record Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1002/dep2.282
Luis Miguel Yeste, Marc Gil-Ortiz, Fernando García-García, César Viseras, Neil David Mcdougall, Patricia Cabello, Luca Caracciolo
{"title":"潮汐点棒与河流点棒:综合三叠纪实例的露头、岩心和有线测井信息得出的主要特征","authors":"Luis Miguel Yeste,&nbsp;Marc Gil-Ortiz,&nbsp;Fernando García-García,&nbsp;César Viseras,&nbsp;Neil David Mcdougall,&nbsp;Patricia Cabello,&nbsp;Luca Caracciolo","doi":"10.1002/dep2.282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Triassic red beds of the Tabular Cover of the Iberian Meseta are an excellent reservoir outcrop analogue, a direct consequence of high-quality exposures, which offer exceptional three-dimensional outcrops, as well as a wide variability of depositional environments. Fluvial and transitional with tide-influenced and wave-influenced settings are recognised. Three point bar geobodies of similar scale, but influenced by different processes, were selected from this succession. Point bar geobody 1 was influenced by purely fluvial processes while geobodies 2 and 3 were tide-influenced. Both types of geobody were developed as point bar deposits in sinuous channels. A fully integrated study was carried out on these geobodies, utilising both outcrop and subsurface-based approaches, to characterise the key differences between fluvial and tidal point bars in the sedimentary record. The outcrop-based component involved traditional field data collection methods alongside digital techniques and data capture, including the use of digital outcrop models. Additionally, subsurface-based methods were employed, utilising core and wireline logs obtained from wells drilled in close proximity to the outcrop. The integration of these approaches aims to accurately differentiate the depositional settings of the three different geobodies, which while apparently very similar in many key respects also exhibit considerable differences when considered from the perspective of subsurface management of potentially similar geobodies. This study also emphasises the need to clearly distinguish high-sinuosity deposits based on their depositional sub-environment in order to properly evaluate their potential for subsurface management. Additionally, it highlights the presence and importance of internal baffles that may well influence fluid migration and indeed even compartmentalise geobodies. Three point bar geobodies of similar scale, but influenced by different processes, have been selected in this succession. A fully integrated study was carried out on these geobodies, utilising both outcrop-based and subsurface-based approaches, to characterise the key differences between fluvial and tidal point bars in the sedimentary record.</p>","PeriodicalId":54144,"journal":{"name":"Depositional Record","volume":"10 5","pages":"793-820"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dep2.282","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tidal versus fluvial point bars: Key features from the integration of outcrop, core and wireline log information of Triassic examples\",\"authors\":\"Luis Miguel Yeste,&nbsp;Marc Gil-Ortiz,&nbsp;Fernando García-García,&nbsp;César Viseras,&nbsp;Neil David Mcdougall,&nbsp;Patricia Cabello,&nbsp;Luca Caracciolo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dep2.282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Triassic red beds of the Tabular Cover of the Iberian Meseta are an excellent reservoir outcrop analogue, a direct consequence of high-quality exposures, which offer exceptional three-dimensional outcrops, as well as a wide variability of depositional environments. Fluvial and transitional with tide-influenced and wave-influenced settings are recognised. Three point bar geobodies of similar scale, but influenced by different processes, were selected from this succession. Point bar geobody 1 was influenced by purely fluvial processes while geobodies 2 and 3 were tide-influenced. Both types of geobody were developed as point bar deposits in sinuous channels. A fully integrated study was carried out on these geobodies, utilising both outcrop and subsurface-based approaches, to characterise the key differences between fluvial and tidal point bars in the sedimentary record. The outcrop-based component involved traditional field data collection methods alongside digital techniques and data capture, including the use of digital outcrop models. Additionally, subsurface-based methods were employed, utilising core and wireline logs obtained from wells drilled in close proximity to the outcrop. The integration of these approaches aims to accurately differentiate the depositional settings of the three different geobodies, which while apparently very similar in many key respects also exhibit considerable differences when considered from the perspective of subsurface management of potentially similar geobodies. This study also emphasises the need to clearly distinguish high-sinuosity deposits based on their depositional sub-environment in order to properly evaluate their potential for subsurface management. Additionally, it highlights the presence and importance of internal baffles that may well influence fluid migration and indeed even compartmentalise geobodies. Three point bar geobodies of similar scale, but influenced by different processes, have been selected in this succession. A fully integrated study was carried out on these geobodies, utilising both outcrop-based and subsurface-based approaches, to characterise the key differences between fluvial and tidal point bars in the sedimentary record.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Depositional Record\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"793-820\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dep2.282\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Depositional Record\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dep2.282\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depositional Record","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dep2.282","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伊比利亚梅塞塔塔状覆盖层的三叠纪红层是一个极好的储层露头模拟物,它是高质量露头的直接结果,可提供卓越的三维露头以及多种多样的沉积环境。冲积层、过渡层、潮汐影响层和波浪影响层的环境都得到了认可。从这一演替中选出了三个规模相似但受不同过程影响的点状条状地质体。点状条形地质体 1 纯粹受河流过程影响,而地质体 2 和 3 则受潮汐影响。这两种地质体都是在蜿蜒的河道中形成的点状条形沉积。对这些地质体进行了全面的综合研究,采用了基于露头和次表层的方法,以确定沉积记录中河道和潮汐点状条带之间的主要差异。基于露头的部分包括传统的野外数据收集方法以及数字技术和数据采集,包括使用数字露头模型。此外,还采用了基于次表层的方法,利用在露头附近钻井获得的岩心和有线测井记录。整合这些方法的目的是准确区分三个不同地质体的沉积环境,虽然这三个地质体在许多关键方面明显非常相似,但从潜在相似地质体的地下管理角度考虑,它们也表现出相当大的差异。这项研究还强调了根据沉积亚环境明确区分高微量沉积物的必要性,以便正确评估其地下管理潜力。此外,它还强调了内部挡板的存在及其重要性,这些挡板很可能会影响流体迁移,甚至将地质体分隔开来。本研究选择了三个规模相似,但受不同过程影响的点棒状地质体。我们对这些地质体进行了全面的综合研究,同时采用了基于露头和基于次表层的方法,以确定沉积记录中河流和潮汐点棒之间的主要差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tidal versus fluvial point bars: Key features from the integration of outcrop, core and wireline log information of Triassic examples

The Triassic red beds of the Tabular Cover of the Iberian Meseta are an excellent reservoir outcrop analogue, a direct consequence of high-quality exposures, which offer exceptional three-dimensional outcrops, as well as a wide variability of depositional environments. Fluvial and transitional with tide-influenced and wave-influenced settings are recognised. Three point bar geobodies of similar scale, but influenced by different processes, were selected from this succession. Point bar geobody 1 was influenced by purely fluvial processes while geobodies 2 and 3 were tide-influenced. Both types of geobody were developed as point bar deposits in sinuous channels. A fully integrated study was carried out on these geobodies, utilising both outcrop and subsurface-based approaches, to characterise the key differences between fluvial and tidal point bars in the sedimentary record. The outcrop-based component involved traditional field data collection methods alongside digital techniques and data capture, including the use of digital outcrop models. Additionally, subsurface-based methods were employed, utilising core and wireline logs obtained from wells drilled in close proximity to the outcrop. The integration of these approaches aims to accurately differentiate the depositional settings of the three different geobodies, which while apparently very similar in many key respects also exhibit considerable differences when considered from the perspective of subsurface management of potentially similar geobodies. This study also emphasises the need to clearly distinguish high-sinuosity deposits based on their depositional sub-environment in order to properly evaluate their potential for subsurface management. Additionally, it highlights the presence and importance of internal baffles that may well influence fluid migration and indeed even compartmentalise geobodies. Three point bar geobodies of similar scale, but influenced by different processes, have been selected in this succession. A fully integrated study was carried out on these geobodies, utilising both outcrop-based and subsurface-based approaches, to characterise the key differences between fluvial and tidal point bars in the sedimentary record.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information The early–middle Cambrian siliciclastic tide-dominated succession in eastern Korea Preservation of groove mark striae formed by armoured mud clasts: The role of armour sediment size and bed yield stress Micritisation products in the inner ramp settings of the Abu Dhabi Lagoon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1