评估 3d 打印机的基础关税,包括 Anylogic 模拟系统

Julian Anindito Widiatmoko, Ratna Purwaningsing, Aries Susanty
{"title":"评估 3d 打印机的基础关税,包括 Anylogic 模拟系统","authors":"Julian Anindito Widiatmoko, Ratna Purwaningsing, Aries Susanty","doi":"10.14710/jati.19.1.26-34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Saat ini teknologi 3D Printing sedang sangat berkembang dengan biaya yang semakin terjangkau. Hal ini mendorong bermunculannya jasa cetak 3D di beberapa kota di Indonesia. Model bisnis yang digunakan adalah menerima model 3D dari pelanggan kemudian mencetaknya dengan 3D printer. Disebabkan oleh tidak terbatasnya variasi model 3D yang mungkin diterima, jasa 3D printing perlu menetapkan basis tarif  dasar yang dipakai. Terdapat dua pilihan basis tarif dasar yang merepresentasikan biaya langsung, yaitu basis material dan basis waktu cetak. Studi ini mengevaluasi performansi kedua basis tersebut menggunakan simulasi Anylogic dalam memaksimalkan pendapatan. Seratus model 3D digunakan untuk mengakomodir variasi pesanan. Estimasi jumlah material dan waktu cetak untuk masing-masing model didapat dari software slicer dan digunakan sebagai inputan simulasi. Dari hasil simulasi pada rentang waktu operasi satu tahun, didapatkan kesimpulan bahwa meskipun kedua basis tarif dasar menunjukkan keunggulan biaya langsung secara bergantian untuk model 3D yang  berbeda, basis material dapat memberikan jumlah pendapatan total yang lebih besar. Rate basis evaluation of 3D printing service using Anylogic simulation. Nowadays, 3D printing technology has been vastly developed at an even more affordable cost. This fact encourages the growth of 3D print services in some Indonesian cities. The business model for this type of service is simple: receiving a 3D model from the customer and then realizing it using 3D printing. Since there are unlimited variations of 3D models that come in, 3D services providers need to determine their basic rate. Two options of rate basis represent direct cost of 3D printing operation, those are material basis and printing time basis. This article evaluates the performance of the two using Anylogic simulation in maximizing revenue. A hundred 3D models were utilized to accommodate variation in order. Material needs and printing time estimation of each model were determined using slicer software as input for the simulation. The result of one year simulation time shows that although both bases can give superiority on direct cost for different individual 3D models, the material basis rate was able to present greater operational income.Keywords: 3D printing; rate basis; Anylogic; simulation","PeriodicalId":512822,"journal":{"name":"J@ti Undip: Jurnal Teknik Industri","volume":"10 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUASI BASIS TARIF DASAR JASA 3D PRINTING DENGAN SIMULASI ANYLOGIC\",\"authors\":\"Julian Anindito Widiatmoko, Ratna Purwaningsing, Aries Susanty\",\"doi\":\"10.14710/jati.19.1.26-34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Saat ini teknologi 3D Printing sedang sangat berkembang dengan biaya yang semakin terjangkau. Hal ini mendorong bermunculannya jasa cetak 3D di beberapa kota di Indonesia. Model bisnis yang digunakan adalah menerima model 3D dari pelanggan kemudian mencetaknya dengan 3D printer. Disebabkan oleh tidak terbatasnya variasi model 3D yang mungkin diterima, jasa 3D printing perlu menetapkan basis tarif  dasar yang dipakai. Terdapat dua pilihan basis tarif dasar yang merepresentasikan biaya langsung, yaitu basis material dan basis waktu cetak. Studi ini mengevaluasi performansi kedua basis tersebut menggunakan simulasi Anylogic dalam memaksimalkan pendapatan. Seratus model 3D digunakan untuk mengakomodir variasi pesanan. Estimasi jumlah material dan waktu cetak untuk masing-masing model didapat dari software slicer dan digunakan sebagai inputan simulasi. Dari hasil simulasi pada rentang waktu operasi satu tahun, didapatkan kesimpulan bahwa meskipun kedua basis tarif dasar menunjukkan keunggulan biaya langsung secara bergantian untuk model 3D yang  berbeda, basis material dapat memberikan jumlah pendapatan total yang lebih besar. Rate basis evaluation of 3D printing service using Anylogic simulation. Nowadays, 3D printing technology has been vastly developed at an even more affordable cost. This fact encourages the growth of 3D print services in some Indonesian cities. The business model for this type of service is simple: receiving a 3D model from the customer and then realizing it using 3D printing. Since there are unlimited variations of 3D models that come in, 3D services providers need to determine their basic rate. Two options of rate basis represent direct cost of 3D printing operation, those are material basis and printing time basis. This article evaluates the performance of the two using Anylogic simulation in maximizing revenue. A hundred 3D models were utilized to accommodate variation in order. Material needs and printing time estimation of each model were determined using slicer software as input for the simulation. The result of one year simulation time shows that although both bases can give superiority on direct cost for different individual 3D models, the material basis rate was able to present greater operational income.Keywords: 3D printing; rate basis; Anylogic; simulation\",\"PeriodicalId\":512822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J@ti Undip: Jurnal Teknik Industri\",\"volume\":\"10 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J@ti Undip: Jurnal Teknik Industri\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14710/jati.19.1.26-34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J@ti Undip: Jurnal Teknik Industri","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/jati.19.1.26-34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,3D 打印技术高度发达,成本也越来越低廉。这促使印尼多个城市出现了三维打印服务。所采用的商业模式是接收客户提供的三维模型,然后用三维打印机打印出来。由于收到的三维模型种类不受限制,三维打印服务需要设定一个基本费率基数。有两种代表直接成本的基准费率选项,即材料基准和打印时间基准。本研究使用 Anylogic 仿真评估了这两种基准在最大化收入方面的表现。我们使用了 100 个三维模型来应对各种订单。每个模型的估计材料数量和打印时间均从切片机软件中获得,并用作模拟输入。从一年运营时间跨度的模拟结果来看,虽然两种费率基础对不同的三维模型都显示出交替的直接成本优势,但材料基础可以提供更多的总收入。使用 Anylogic 仿真对 3D 打印服务进行费率基础评估。如今,三维打印技术得到了长足发展,而且成本更加低廉。这一事实促进了 3D 打印服务在印尼一些城市的发展。这种服务的商业模式很简单:接收客户提供的三维模型,然后用三维打印技术将其实现。由于三维模型的变化是无限的,因此三维服务提供商需要确定其基本费率。有两种费率基础选项代表了三维打印操作的直接成本,即材料基础和打印时间基础。本文使用 Anylogic 仿真评估了这两种方案在实现收入最大化方面的表现。为了适应订单的变化,我们使用了 100 个三维模型。使用切片软件确定了每个模型的材料需求和印刷时间估算,作为模拟的输入。一年的模拟结果表明,虽然两种基数都能为不同的单个三维模型带来直接成本上的优势,但材料基数费率能带来更大的运营收入:3D打印;费率基础;Anylogic;模拟
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EVALUASI BASIS TARIF DASAR JASA 3D PRINTING DENGAN SIMULASI ANYLOGIC
Saat ini teknologi 3D Printing sedang sangat berkembang dengan biaya yang semakin terjangkau. Hal ini mendorong bermunculannya jasa cetak 3D di beberapa kota di Indonesia. Model bisnis yang digunakan adalah menerima model 3D dari pelanggan kemudian mencetaknya dengan 3D printer. Disebabkan oleh tidak terbatasnya variasi model 3D yang mungkin diterima, jasa 3D printing perlu menetapkan basis tarif  dasar yang dipakai. Terdapat dua pilihan basis tarif dasar yang merepresentasikan biaya langsung, yaitu basis material dan basis waktu cetak. Studi ini mengevaluasi performansi kedua basis tersebut menggunakan simulasi Anylogic dalam memaksimalkan pendapatan. Seratus model 3D digunakan untuk mengakomodir variasi pesanan. Estimasi jumlah material dan waktu cetak untuk masing-masing model didapat dari software slicer dan digunakan sebagai inputan simulasi. Dari hasil simulasi pada rentang waktu operasi satu tahun, didapatkan kesimpulan bahwa meskipun kedua basis tarif dasar menunjukkan keunggulan biaya langsung secara bergantian untuk model 3D yang  berbeda, basis material dapat memberikan jumlah pendapatan total yang lebih besar. Rate basis evaluation of 3D printing service using Anylogic simulation. Nowadays, 3D printing technology has been vastly developed at an even more affordable cost. This fact encourages the growth of 3D print services in some Indonesian cities. The business model for this type of service is simple: receiving a 3D model from the customer and then realizing it using 3D printing. Since there are unlimited variations of 3D models that come in, 3D services providers need to determine their basic rate. Two options of rate basis represent direct cost of 3D printing operation, those are material basis and printing time basis. This article evaluates the performance of the two using Anylogic simulation in maximizing revenue. A hundred 3D models were utilized to accommodate variation in order. Material needs and printing time estimation of each model were determined using slicer software as input for the simulation. The result of one year simulation time shows that although both bases can give superiority on direct cost for different individual 3D models, the material basis rate was able to present greater operational income.Keywords: 3D printing; rate basis; Anylogic; simulation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MEMBANGUN INDEKS KOMPOSIT DALAM MENGEVALUASI EFEKTIVITAS KEBIJAKAN SNI WAJIB: LITERATURE REVIEW REUSE OF SPUN PILE PRODUCTION WASTE FOR PAVING BLOCK DEVELOPMENT BY TAGUCHI METHOD EVALUASI BASIS TARIF DASAR JASA 3D PRINTING DENGAN SIMULASI ANYLOGIC IMPLEMENTASI METODE HIRA DAN HAZOP UNTUK MEMINIMALISIR POTENSI BAHAYA KESEHATAN DAN KESELAMATAN KERJA PADA INDUSTRI FURNITUR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1