零售业商业模式的比较分析:快速循环 VS.长期可持续性

Md Rohul Amin
{"title":"零售业商业模式的比较分析:快速循环 VS.长期可持续性","authors":"Md Rohul Amin","doi":"10.62304/ijse.v1i2.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study conducts a comprehensive comparative analysis of fast-cycle and long-term sustainability business models in the retail industry. Through a mixed-methods approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data, this research examines the key characteristics, underlying mechanisms, and impacts of these two contrasting models. The findings reveal stark differences in supply chain structures, design and production processes, marketing strategies, and consumer behavior. While fast-cycle models excel in speed, affordability, and trend responsiveness, they are associated with environmental degradation, ethical concerns, and a culture of disposability. Conversely, sustainable models prioritize ethical sourcing, environmental responsibility, and long-term value creation, but face challenges related to cost, scalability, and the need to balance timelessness with trend relevance. The implications for retailers, policymakers, and consumers are discussed, with a focus on the potential for hybrid models that combine elements of both approaches. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on sustainable business practices and provides valuable insights for retailers seeking to navigate the complex landscape of consumer preferences and sustainability demands.","PeriodicalId":518594,"journal":{"name":"Global Mainstream Journal","volume":"58 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BUSINESS MODELS IN RETAIL: FAST CYCLE VS. LONG-TERM SUSTAINABILITY\",\"authors\":\"Md Rohul Amin\",\"doi\":\"10.62304/ijse.v1i2.141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study conducts a comprehensive comparative analysis of fast-cycle and long-term sustainability business models in the retail industry. Through a mixed-methods approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data, this research examines the key characteristics, underlying mechanisms, and impacts of these two contrasting models. The findings reveal stark differences in supply chain structures, design and production processes, marketing strategies, and consumer behavior. While fast-cycle models excel in speed, affordability, and trend responsiveness, they are associated with environmental degradation, ethical concerns, and a culture of disposability. Conversely, sustainable models prioritize ethical sourcing, environmental responsibility, and long-term value creation, but face challenges related to cost, scalability, and the need to balance timelessness with trend relevance. The implications for retailers, policymakers, and consumers are discussed, with a focus on the potential for hybrid models that combine elements of both approaches. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on sustainable business practices and provides valuable insights for retailers seeking to navigate the complex landscape of consumer preferences and sustainability demands.\",\"PeriodicalId\":518594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Mainstream Journal\",\"volume\":\"58 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Mainstream Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62304/ijse.v1i2.141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Mainstream Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62304/ijse.v1i2.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对零售业的快速周期和长期可持续性商业模式进行了全面的比较分析。本研究采用混合方法,结合定量和定性数据,对这两种截然不同的模式的主要特征、内在机制和影响进行了研究。研究结果表明,这两种模式在供应链结构、设计和生产流程、营销策略以及消费者行为等方面存在明显差异。虽然快速周期模式在速度、经济性和趋势响应方面表现出色,但却与环境退化、道德问题和一次性文化有关。与此相反,可持续模式优先考虑道德采购、环境责任和长期价值创造,但也面临着成本、可扩展性以及需要平衡时效性和潮流相关性等方面的挑战。本研究讨论了对零售商、政策制定者和消费者的影响,重点是结合两种方法元素的混合模式的潜力。这项研究为不断增加的可持续商业实践文献做出了贡献,并为零售商在消费者偏好和可持续发展需求的复杂环境中寻求导航提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BUSINESS MODELS IN RETAIL: FAST CYCLE VS. LONG-TERM SUSTAINABILITY
This study conducts a comprehensive comparative analysis of fast-cycle and long-term sustainability business models in the retail industry. Through a mixed-methods approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data, this research examines the key characteristics, underlying mechanisms, and impacts of these two contrasting models. The findings reveal stark differences in supply chain structures, design and production processes, marketing strategies, and consumer behavior. While fast-cycle models excel in speed, affordability, and trend responsiveness, they are associated with environmental degradation, ethical concerns, and a culture of disposability. Conversely, sustainable models prioritize ethical sourcing, environmental responsibility, and long-term value creation, but face challenges related to cost, scalability, and the need to balance timelessness with trend relevance. The implications for retailers, policymakers, and consumers are discussed, with a focus on the potential for hybrid models that combine elements of both approaches. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on sustainable business practices and provides valuable insights for retailers seeking to navigate the complex landscape of consumer preferences and sustainability demands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A FEASIBILITY STUDY ON UNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPLEMENTATION TO ENHANCE DHAKA’S ELECTRICAL GRID RELIABILITY AI-POWERED PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RISK MANAGEMENT IN SUPPLY CHAIN OPERATIONS: A BIG DATA APPROACH Housebuilding Finance in the United States: From Budgeting to Funding A FRAMEWORK FOR LEAN MANUFACTURING IMPLEMENTATION IN THE TEXTILE INDUSTRY: A RESEARCH STUDY A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS IN ENHANCING CYBERSECURITY THREAT DETECTION AND RESPONSE MECHANISMS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1