瑞芬太尼在临床麻醉和术后镇痛中的效果

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.4314/tjpr.v23i4.11
Jing Lv, Yuzhu Zhang
{"title":"瑞芬太尼在临床麻醉和术后镇痛中的效果","authors":"Jing Lv, Yuzhu Zhang","doi":"10.4314/tjpr.v23i4.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To investigate the effect of remifentanil in clinical anesthesia and postoperative intravenous analgesia. \nMethods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of 100 patients who received remifentanil for anesthesia and postoperative intravenous analgesia at Zibo Center Hospital, Zibo, China from February 2020 to February 2023. The patients were divided into study and control groups comprising 50 patients in each group. The study group received remifentanil intravenously (8 g/kg) while the control group received fentanyl (3 - 4 μg/kg). Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and Bispectral Index (BIS) were monitored 5 min before anesthesia (T1), 10 min after (T2), 40 min after (T3), and 5 min before the end of surgery (T4). The levels of blood glucose (Glu), angiotensin II (Ang II), and cortisol (Cor) were measured at T1, T2, T3, and T4. Analgesic and sedative effects were evaluated 3, 12 and 24 h after surgery using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Ramsay sedation score. \nResults: At T1, T2, T3, and T4, there were no significant differences in HR, MAP, and BIS between the two groups (p > 0.05), while the levels of Glu, Ang II, and Cor in study group were significantly lower (p < 0.05). At 3, 12 and 24 h after surgery, VAS score in the study group was significantly lower, while Ramsay's analgesia score was significantly higher (p < 0.05). Total effectiveness was significantly higher in the study group (p < 0.05). Recovery time for orientation, spontaneous breathing, awakening, stay in the recovery room, and incidence of adverse reactions were significantly lower in study group (p < 0.05). \nConclusion: The use of remifentanil for postoperative intravenous analgesia significantly lowers stress response, sedation and improves recovery time. It is, therefore, effective, and produces lower adverse effects than fentanyl. Large-scale investigation to determine the impact of confounding factors on the outcome of fentanyl/remifentanil combination is required.","PeriodicalId":23347,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of remifentanil in clinical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia\",\"authors\":\"Jing Lv, Yuzhu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/tjpr.v23i4.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To investigate the effect of remifentanil in clinical anesthesia and postoperative intravenous analgesia. \\nMethods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of 100 patients who received remifentanil for anesthesia and postoperative intravenous analgesia at Zibo Center Hospital, Zibo, China from February 2020 to February 2023. The patients were divided into study and control groups comprising 50 patients in each group. The study group received remifentanil intravenously (8 g/kg) while the control group received fentanyl (3 - 4 μg/kg). Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and Bispectral Index (BIS) were monitored 5 min before anesthesia (T1), 10 min after (T2), 40 min after (T3), and 5 min before the end of surgery (T4). The levels of blood glucose (Glu), angiotensin II (Ang II), and cortisol (Cor) were measured at T1, T2, T3, and T4. Analgesic and sedative effects were evaluated 3, 12 and 24 h after surgery using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Ramsay sedation score. \\nResults: At T1, T2, T3, and T4, there were no significant differences in HR, MAP, and BIS between the two groups (p > 0.05), while the levels of Glu, Ang II, and Cor in study group were significantly lower (p < 0.05). At 3, 12 and 24 h after surgery, VAS score in the study group was significantly lower, while Ramsay's analgesia score was significantly higher (p < 0.05). Total effectiveness was significantly higher in the study group (p < 0.05). Recovery time for orientation, spontaneous breathing, awakening, stay in the recovery room, and incidence of adverse reactions were significantly lower in study group (p < 0.05). \\nConclusion: The use of remifentanil for postoperative intravenous analgesia significantly lowers stress response, sedation and improves recovery time. It is, therefore, effective, and produces lower adverse effects than fentanyl. Large-scale investigation to determine the impact of confounding factors on the outcome of fentanyl/remifentanil combination is required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v23i4.11\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v23i4.11","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨瑞芬太尼在临床麻醉和术后静脉镇痛中的应用效果。方法:对 100 例接受瑞芬太尼麻醉和术后静脉镇痛的患者病历进行回顾性分析:回顾性分析2020年2月至2023年2月在淄博市淄博中心医院接受瑞芬太尼麻醉和术后静脉镇痛的100例患者的病历。患者分为研究组和对照组,每组 50 人。研究组静脉注射瑞芬太尼(8 克/千克),对照组静脉注射芬太尼(3 - 4 微克/千克)。分别在麻醉前 5 分钟(T1)、麻醉后 10 分钟(T2)、麻醉后 40 分钟(T3)和手术结束前 5 分钟(T4)监测心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)和双谱指数(BIS)。在 T1、T2、T3 和 T4 测量血糖 (Glu)、血管紧张素 II (Ang II) 和皮质醇 (Cor) 水平。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和拉姆塞镇静评分法评估术后 3、12 和 24 小时的镇痛和镇静效果。结果:在 T1、T2、T3 和 T4,两组间的 HR、MAP 和 BIS 无显著差异(P > 0.05),而研究组的 Glu、Ang II 和 Cor 水平显著较低(P < 0.05)。术后 3、12 和 24 小时,研究组的 VAS 评分明显较低,而 Ramsay 镇痛评分明显较高(P < 0.05)。研究组的总有效率明显更高(P < 0.05)。研究组的定向、自主呼吸、苏醒、恢复室停留时间和不良反应发生率明显更低(P < 0.05)。结论使用瑞芬太尼进行术后静脉镇痛可明显降低应激反应、镇静和改善恢复时间。因此,与芬太尼相比,瑞芬太尼有效且产生的不良反应较少。需要进行大规模调查,以确定混杂因素对芬太尼/瑞芬太尼联合镇痛效果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of remifentanil in clinical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia
Purpose: To investigate the effect of remifentanil in clinical anesthesia and postoperative intravenous analgesia. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of 100 patients who received remifentanil for anesthesia and postoperative intravenous analgesia at Zibo Center Hospital, Zibo, China from February 2020 to February 2023. The patients were divided into study and control groups comprising 50 patients in each group. The study group received remifentanil intravenously (8 g/kg) while the control group received fentanyl (3 - 4 μg/kg). Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and Bispectral Index (BIS) were monitored 5 min before anesthesia (T1), 10 min after (T2), 40 min after (T3), and 5 min before the end of surgery (T4). The levels of blood glucose (Glu), angiotensin II (Ang II), and cortisol (Cor) were measured at T1, T2, T3, and T4. Analgesic and sedative effects were evaluated 3, 12 and 24 h after surgery using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Ramsay sedation score. Results: At T1, T2, T3, and T4, there were no significant differences in HR, MAP, and BIS between the two groups (p > 0.05), while the levels of Glu, Ang II, and Cor in study group were significantly lower (p < 0.05). At 3, 12 and 24 h after surgery, VAS score in the study group was significantly lower, while Ramsay's analgesia score was significantly higher (p < 0.05). Total effectiveness was significantly higher in the study group (p < 0.05). Recovery time for orientation, spontaneous breathing, awakening, stay in the recovery room, and incidence of adverse reactions were significantly lower in study group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The use of remifentanil for postoperative intravenous analgesia significantly lowers stress response, sedation and improves recovery time. It is, therefore, effective, and produces lower adverse effects than fentanyl. Large-scale investigation to determine the impact of confounding factors on the outcome of fentanyl/remifentanil combination is required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
490
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: We seek to encourage pharmaceutical and allied research of tropical and international relevance and to foster multidisciplinary research and collaboration among scientists, the pharmaceutical industry and the healthcare professionals. We publish articles in pharmaceutical sciences and related disciplines (including biotechnology, cell and molecular biology, drug utilization including adverse drug events, medical and other life sciences, and related engineering fields). Although primarily devoted to original research papers, we welcome reviews on current topics of special interest and relevance.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of the combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin and bevacizumab for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer Effect of aspirin combination/clopidogrel combination on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and P-selectin levels in patients with acute coronary syndrome Effect of remifentanil in clinical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia Diabetic self-care practice and quality of life among diabetes patients in the Hail region of Saudi Arabia Effect of 1, 25 dihydroxy v itamin D3 on T Helper 17 (TH17) cell pathways in diarrhea associated irritable bowel syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1