乌克兰刑事法律中规定医疗犯罪和轻罪责任的条款的修订:解释和执行问题

Serhii Grynchak, A. Grynchak
{"title":"乌克兰刑事法律中规定医疗犯罪和轻罪责任的条款的修订:解释和执行问题","authors":"Serhii Grynchak, A. Grynchak","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.164.290039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problems of criminal law protection of life and health of a person in the field of medical care attract the special attention of scientists, because it is about the most valuable constitutional rights and freedoms of a person. At the same time, the results of the analysis of criminal statistics regarding registered medical crimes and misdemeanours, their further pretrial investigation and trial, give grounds for serious concern. The reasons for the negative investigative and judicial practice may be the shortcomings of the legal construction of the norms, numerous changes made to the Criminal Code, as well as the high latency of medical offenses. Therefore, the purpose of this article is a comprehensive study of the amendment of the criminal legislation of Ukraine, which provides for responsibility for medical offenses, identifying the shortcomings and advantages of such legislative decisions, as well as formulating separate recommendations for the enforcement of the norms of the Criminal Code. The following research methods were used to achieve the specified goals. The dialectical method of cognition made it possible to establish the norms of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which provide for responsibility for medical offenses and to reveal the problems of their enforcement. The historical method made it possible to identify all normative acts that amended the norms of the Criminal Code, which provide for liability for medical offenses. The dogmatic method made it possible to clarify the true content of such concepts as \"order of application of transplantation\", \"activity connected with transplantation\", \" substantial harm to the victim's health\", etc. The systemic-structural method was used to analyse such evaluative concepts as \"damage to the victim's health\", \" substantial damage to the victim's health\", \"severe consequences\", etc., which are used in many provisions of the Criminal Code and are interpreted in different ways in judicial practice. The comparative legal method was used to compare the regulatory national legislation of Ukraine in the field of medical care and the relevant norms of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The conducted research gave grounds for the conclusion that socially dangerous consequences in the form of \"substantial harm to the victim's health\", which are provided for in Part 1 of Art. 143 of the Criminal Code, cover the infliction of light physical injuries on the victim that caused a short-term health disorder or minor loss of working capacity, moderate physical injuries, severe physical injuries, as well as infection with the human immunodeficiency virus or other incurable infectious disease. At the same time, negligently causing the death of a recipient during an illegal transplantation requires additional qualification under a set of criminal offenses. The revealed cases of arbitrary and sometimes unsystematic use of different evaluation concepts of harm to human health in the norms of the Special Part of the Criminal Code point to the urgent need for unification in the criminal legislation of Ukraine, both the concept of \"harm to health\" and the normative consolidation of its types.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":" 53","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novelization of the provisions of the criminal legislation of Ukraine, which provide for liability for medical crimes and misdemeanors: issues of interpretation and enforcement\",\"authors\":\"Serhii Grynchak, A. Grynchak\",\"doi\":\"10.21564/2414-990x.164.290039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problems of criminal law protection of life and health of a person in the field of medical care attract the special attention of scientists, because it is about the most valuable constitutional rights and freedoms of a person. At the same time, the results of the analysis of criminal statistics regarding registered medical crimes and misdemeanours, their further pretrial investigation and trial, give grounds for serious concern. The reasons for the negative investigative and judicial practice may be the shortcomings of the legal construction of the norms, numerous changes made to the Criminal Code, as well as the high latency of medical offenses. Therefore, the purpose of this article is a comprehensive study of the amendment of the criminal legislation of Ukraine, which provides for responsibility for medical offenses, identifying the shortcomings and advantages of such legislative decisions, as well as formulating separate recommendations for the enforcement of the norms of the Criminal Code. The following research methods were used to achieve the specified goals. The dialectical method of cognition made it possible to establish the norms of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which provide for responsibility for medical offenses and to reveal the problems of their enforcement. The historical method made it possible to identify all normative acts that amended the norms of the Criminal Code, which provide for liability for medical offenses. The dogmatic method made it possible to clarify the true content of such concepts as \\\"order of application of transplantation\\\", \\\"activity connected with transplantation\\\", \\\" substantial harm to the victim's health\\\", etc. The systemic-structural method was used to analyse such evaluative concepts as \\\"damage to the victim's health\\\", \\\" substantial damage to the victim's health\\\", \\\"severe consequences\\\", etc., which are used in many provisions of the Criminal Code and are interpreted in different ways in judicial practice. The comparative legal method was used to compare the regulatory national legislation of Ukraine in the field of medical care and the relevant norms of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The conducted research gave grounds for the conclusion that socially dangerous consequences in the form of \\\"substantial harm to the victim's health\\\", which are provided for in Part 1 of Art. 143 of the Criminal Code, cover the infliction of light physical injuries on the victim that caused a short-term health disorder or minor loss of working capacity, moderate physical injuries, severe physical injuries, as well as infection with the human immunodeficiency virus or other incurable infectious disease. At the same time, negligently causing the death of a recipient during an illegal transplantation requires additional qualification under a set of criminal offenses. The revealed cases of arbitrary and sometimes unsystematic use of different evaluation concepts of harm to human health in the norms of the Special Part of the Criminal Code point to the urgent need for unification in the criminal legislation of Ukraine, both the concept of \\\"harm to health\\\" and the normative consolidation of its types.\",\"PeriodicalId\":417369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problems of Legality\",\"volume\":\" 53\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problems of Legality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.164.290039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Legality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.164.290039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

刑法在医疗领域保护人的生命和健康的问题引起了科学家们的特别关注,因为这关系到一个人最宝贵的宪法权利和自由。与此同时,对已登记的医疗犯罪和轻罪及其进一步的审前调查和审判进行刑事统计分析的结果也引起了人们的严重关切。调查和司法实践中出现消极现象的原因可能是法律规范建设的缺陷、对《刑法典》的多次修改以及医疗犯罪的高潜伏性。因此,本文的目的是全面研究乌克兰刑事立法的修订情况,其中规定了医疗犯罪的责任,确定了此类立法决定的缺点和优点,并为执行《刑法典》的规范分别提出了建议。为实现特定目标,采用了以下研究方法。辩证认识方法有助于确定《乌克兰刑法典》中规定医疗犯罪责任的准则,并揭示其执行问题。通过历史方法,可以确定对《乌克兰刑法典》中规定医疗犯罪责任的准则进行修改的所有规范性法案。教条主义方法有助于澄清 "移植应用顺序"、"与移植有关的活动"、"对受害人健康的重大损害" 等概念的真正内涵。系统结构法被用来分析 "对受害人健康的损害"、"对受害人健康的实质性损害"、"严重后果" 等评价性概念,这些概念在《刑法典》的许多条款中都有使用,在司法实践中也有不同的解释。比较法律方法被用于比较乌克兰在医疗领域的规范性国家立法和《乌克兰刑法典》的相关准则。通过研究得出的结论是,《乌克兰刑法典》第 143 条第 1 部分规定的 "对受害者健康造成重大损害 "的社会危险后果涵盖了《乌克兰刑法典》第 143 条第 1 部分规定的 "对受害者健康造成重大损害 "的社会危险后果。刑法典》第 143 条第 1 部分规定的 "对受害者健康造成重大伤害 "的社会危险后果包括对受害者造成轻度身体伤害,导致短期健康紊乱或轻微丧失工作能力、中度身体伤害、重度身体伤害,以及感染人体免疫缺陷病毒或其他无法治愈的传染病。与此同时,在非法移植过程中因过失造成受体死亡的,还需要根据一系列刑事犯罪进行额外的定性。所揭示的《刑法典》特别部分的规范中任意和有时不系统地使用对人类健康造成损害的不同评价概念的情况表明,迫切需要在乌克兰刑事立法中统一 "对健康造成损害 "的概念及其类型的规范整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Novelization of the provisions of the criminal legislation of Ukraine, which provide for liability for medical crimes and misdemeanors: issues of interpretation and enforcement
The problems of criminal law protection of life and health of a person in the field of medical care attract the special attention of scientists, because it is about the most valuable constitutional rights and freedoms of a person. At the same time, the results of the analysis of criminal statistics regarding registered medical crimes and misdemeanours, their further pretrial investigation and trial, give grounds for serious concern. The reasons for the negative investigative and judicial practice may be the shortcomings of the legal construction of the norms, numerous changes made to the Criminal Code, as well as the high latency of medical offenses. Therefore, the purpose of this article is a comprehensive study of the amendment of the criminal legislation of Ukraine, which provides for responsibility for medical offenses, identifying the shortcomings and advantages of such legislative decisions, as well as formulating separate recommendations for the enforcement of the norms of the Criminal Code. The following research methods were used to achieve the specified goals. The dialectical method of cognition made it possible to establish the norms of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which provide for responsibility for medical offenses and to reveal the problems of their enforcement. The historical method made it possible to identify all normative acts that amended the norms of the Criminal Code, which provide for liability for medical offenses. The dogmatic method made it possible to clarify the true content of such concepts as "order of application of transplantation", "activity connected with transplantation", " substantial harm to the victim's health", etc. The systemic-structural method was used to analyse such evaluative concepts as "damage to the victim's health", " substantial damage to the victim's health", "severe consequences", etc., which are used in many provisions of the Criminal Code and are interpreted in different ways in judicial practice. The comparative legal method was used to compare the regulatory national legislation of Ukraine in the field of medical care and the relevant norms of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. The conducted research gave grounds for the conclusion that socially dangerous consequences in the form of "substantial harm to the victim's health", which are provided for in Part 1 of Art. 143 of the Criminal Code, cover the infliction of light physical injuries on the victim that caused a short-term health disorder or minor loss of working capacity, moderate physical injuries, severe physical injuries, as well as infection with the human immunodeficiency virus or other incurable infectious disease. At the same time, negligently causing the death of a recipient during an illegal transplantation requires additional qualification under a set of criminal offenses. The revealed cases of arbitrary and sometimes unsystematic use of different evaluation concepts of harm to human health in the norms of the Special Part of the Criminal Code point to the urgent need for unification in the criminal legislation of Ukraine, both the concept of "harm to health" and the normative consolidation of its types.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of legal regulation of exemptions in the payment and calculation of land fees in the conditions of martial law on the basis of judicial practice Ways to Protect Infringed Rights in the Creation and Distribution of Deepfakes Creation and Legal Status of a Specially Authorized Body of Non-Banking Financial Services Implementation of the Ecosystem Services Concept in the Environmental Legislation of Ukraine: Current State and Prospects Modern Challenges of Adjusting the Effectiveness of the Application of Laws (on the Example of Tax and Legal Regulation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1